World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan Pries-Heje

Jan Pries-Heje

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
7868
World Ranking
12415
National Ranking
60

Jan Pries-Heje publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Pries-Heje sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 190 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jan Pries-Heje D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Pries-Heje sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Pries-Heje is affiliated with Roskilde University in Denmark. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Business, Management and Accounting, Computer Science, and Engineering. Within these domains, their work concentrates on subfields such as Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Artificial Intelligence, and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's research addresses a variety of topics, including Information Systems Theories and Implementation, Big Data and Business Intelligence, FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance, Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management, Digital Transformation in Industry, Product Development and Customization, and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development.

Jan Pries-Heje has contributed to several recent papers. These include:

  • "Opinion Paper: 'So what if ChatGPT wrote it?' Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy" (2023), published in International Journal of Information Management
  • "Becoming a Most Digitalized Country: A History of Digital Organizational Resilience in Denmark" (2022), published in Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  • "Digital Organizational Resilience: A History of Denmark as a Most Digitalized Country" (2021), presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • "Symptom-based improvement recommendations" (2021), published in Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • "Boundary Management Strategies for Leading Digital Transformation in Smart Cities" (2023), published in MIS Quarterly Executive

Their scholarly work has appeared frequently in venues including:

  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • International Journal of Information Management
  • Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  • Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • MIS Quarterly Executive

Jan Pries-Heje collaborates regularly with several scholars, notably Richard Baskerville, Benedicte Fleron, Jørn Johansen, Morten Korsaa, and Marijn Janssen.

Best Publications

  • FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research

    John R. Venable;Jan Pries-Heje;Richard L. Baskerville;Richard L. Baskerville

  • A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research

    John Venable;Jan Pries-Heje;Richard Baskerville

  • Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice

    Richard Baskerville;Jan Pries-Heje

  • Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation

    Jan Pries-Heje;Richard L. Baskerville;John R. Venable

  • Explanatory Design Theory

    Richard L. Baskerville;Jan Pries-Heje

  • Soft design science methodology

    Richard Baskerville;Jan Pries-Heje;John Venable

  • The design theory nexus

    Jan Pries-Heje;Richard Baskerville

  • Business agility and diffusion of information technology

    Lars Mathiassen;Jan Pries-Heje

  • Short cycle time systems development

    Richard L. Baskerville;Jan Pries-Heje

  • Is "Internet-speed" software development different?

    R. Baskerville;B. Ramesh;L. Levine;J. Pries-Heje

  • Theorizing in design science research

    Jong Seok Lee;Jan Pries-Heje;Richard Baskerville

  • A multiple-theory analysis of a diffusion of information technology case

    Richard L. Baskerville;Jan Pries-Heje

  • The Sciences of Design: Observations on an Emerging Field

    Sandeep Purao;Carliss Y. Baldwin;Alan R. Hevner;Veda C. Storey

  • Aligning software processes with strategy

    Sandra A. Slaughter;Linda Levine;Balasubramaniam Ramesh;Jan Pries-Heje

  • How Internet software companies negotiate quality

    R. Baskerville;L. Levine;J. Pries-Heje;S. Slaughter

  • Extensible Architectures: The Strategic Value of Service Oriented Architecture in Banking

    Richard L. Baskerville;Marco Cavallari;Kristian Hjort-Madsen;Jan Pries-Heje

  • Learning SPI in Practice

    Lars Mathiassen;Peter Axel Nielsen;Jan Pries-Heje

  • Improving Software Organizations : From Principles to Practice

    Lars Mathiassen;Jan Pries-Heje;Ojelanki Ngwenyama

  • Racing the E-Bomb: How the Internet Is Redefining Information Systems Development Methodology

    Richard Baskerville;Jan Pries-Heje

  • Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology

    Karlheinz Kautz;Jan Pries-Heje

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard L. Baskerville
Richard L. Baskerville Georgia State University
Balasubramaniam Ramesh
Balasubramaniam Ramesh Georgia State University
Lars Mathiassen
Lars Mathiassen Georgia State University
David E. Avison
David E. Avison École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales
Sandra A. Slaughter
Sandra A. Slaughter Georgia Institute of Technology
John Krogstie
John Krogstie Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Morten Hertzum
Morten Hertzum Roskilde University
Peter V. Nielsen
Peter V. Nielsen Aalborg University
Alan R. Hevner
Alan R. Hevner University of South Florida
Veda C. Storey
Veda C. Storey Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in computer science opens up many flexible and affordable options. Whether you’re starting your journey or seeking to upskill, there are pathways available for various needs and goals.

Many choose to begin with an associate's degree online to quickly gain foundational skills and enter the tech workforce. For those looking to advance further, accelerated programs are available, allowing you to earn the shortest online masters degree in less time without compromising on quality.

If you’re wondering which master's degree is most in demand in USA, computer science consistently ranks highly, thanks to its strong job prospects and relevance across industries.

Cost is a key concern for many students. Fortunately, some of the cheapest online degrees in the country offer robust computer science programs, making quality education accessible to a broader range of learners.

These flexible and affordable options help students launch successful careers in technology—no matter their starting point.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Pries-Heje

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles