World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
13053
World Ranking
7968
National Ranking
588

Antonio J. Pierik publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio J. Pierik sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 151 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Antonio J. Pierik D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio J. Pierik sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonio J. Pierik is affiliated with the Technical University of Kaiserslautern in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, as well as energy research. Their work spans molecular biology, renewable energy and sustainability, materials chemistry, inorganic chemistry, and nutrition and dietetics.

The main research topics addressed by Antonio J. Pierik include:

  • Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
  • Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Trace Elements in Health
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography

The recent papers authored or co-authored by Pierik demonstrate ongoing engagement with multiple aspects of biochemical and structural studies:

  • "Structures of the sulfite detoxifying F420-dependent enzyme from Methanococcales," 2023, published in Nature Chemical Biology
  • "Turn-on fluorescence sensors based on dynamic intramolecular N→B-coordination," 2020, published in Organic Chemistry Frontiers
  • "A noncanonical cytochrome c stimulates calcium binding by PilY1 for type IVa pili formation," 2022, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Cytosolic iron-sulfur protein assembly system identifies clients by a C-terminal tripeptide," 2023, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Requirements for the biogenesis of [2Fe-2S] proteins in the human and yeast cytosol," 2024, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Antonio J. Pierik frequently publishes in venues that focus on high-impact and preprint research dissemination. Notable frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Communications Biology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Collaborative research is a significant aspect of Pierik's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Raphael Koch
  • Andreas Orthaber
  • Frank Pammer
  • Volker Schünemann
  • Catharina M. Blinn

Antonio J. Pierik's research covers diverse biochemical mechanisms and structural biology approaches, with a strong emphasis on metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins. Their work contributes to understanding both fundamental biological systems and applications related to energy and materials chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Biological activation of hydrogen.

    Randolph P. Happe;Winfried Roseboom;Antonio J. Pierik;Simon P. J. Albracht

  • The role of mitochondria in cellular iron–sulfur protein biogenesis and iron metabolism ☆

    Roland Lill;Bastian Hoffmann;Sabine Molik;Antonio J. Pierik

  • Humans possess two mitochondrial ferredoxins, Fdx1 and Fdx2, with distinct roles in steroidogenesis, heme, and Fe/S cluster biosynthesis.

    Alex D. Sheftel;Oliver Stehling;Antonio J. Pierik;Hans-Peter Elsässer

  • Eukaryotic DNA polymerases require an iron-sulfur cluster for the formation of active complexes

    Daili J A Netz;Carrie M Stith;Martin Stümpfig;Gabriele Köpf

  • A low-spin iron with CN and CO as intrinsic ligands forms the core of the active site in [Fe]-hydrogenases.

    Antonio J. Pierik;Marco Hulstein;Wilfred R. Hagen;Simon P. J. Albracht

  • Carbon Monoxide and Cyanide as Intrinsic Ligands to Iron in the Active Site of [NiFe]-Hydrogenases NiFe(CN)2CO, BIOLOGY’S WAY TO ACTIVATE H2

    Antonio J. Pierik;Winfried Roseboom;Randolph P. Happe;Kimberly A. Bagley

  • MMS19 assembles iron-sulfur proteins required for DNA metabolism and genomic integrity.

    Oliver Stehling;Ajay A. Vashisht;Judita Mascarenhas;Zophonias O. Jonsson

  • Anaerobic Initial Reaction of n-Alkanes in a Denitrifying Bacterium: Evidence for (1-Methylpentyl)succinate as Initial Product and for Involvement of an Organic Radical in n-Hexane Metabolism

    Ralf Rabus;Heinz Wilkes;Astrid Behrends;Antje Armstroff

  • Human Ind1, an Iron-Sulfur Cluster Assembly Factor for Respiratory Complex I

    Alex D. Sheftel;Oliver Stehling;Antonio J. Pierik;Daili J. A. Netz

  • Synthesis and uptake of the compatible solutes ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine by Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) in response to salt and heat stresses.

    Jan Bursy;Anne U. Kuhlmann;Marco Pittelkow;Holger Hartmann

  • Crystal Structures of Nucleotide-Free and Glutathione-Bound Mitochondrial ABC Transporter Atm1

    Vasundara Srinivasan;Antonio J. Pierik;Roland Lill;Roland Lill

  • The hydrogenase‐like Nar1p is essential for maturation of cytosolic and nuclear iron–sulphur proteins

    Janneke Balk;Antonio J Pierik;Daili J Aguilar Netz;Ulrich Mühlenhoff

  • Tah18 transfers electrons to Dre2 in cytosolic iron-sulfur protein biogenesis.

    Daili J A Netz;Martin Stümpfig;Carole Doré;Ulrich Mühlenhoff

  • The role of mitochondria and the CIA machinery in the maturation of cytosolic and nuclear iron–sulfur proteins

    Roland Lill;Rafal Dutkiewicz;Rafal Dutkiewicz;Sven A. Freibert;Torsten Heidenreich

  • Mechanisms of iron-sulfur protein maturation in mitochondria, cytosol and nucleus of eukaryotes.

    Roland Lill;Rafal Dutkiewicz;Hans-Peter Elsässer;Anja Hausmann

  • The Cfd1–Nbp35 complex acts as a scaffold for iron-sulfur protein assembly in the yeast cytosol

    Daili J A Netz;Antonio J Pierik;Martin Stümpfig;Ulrich Mühlenhoff

  • The iron–sulphur protein Ind1 is required for effective complex I assembly

    Katrine Bych;Stefan Kerscher;Daili J A Netz;Antonio J Pierik

  • Maturation of cytosolic and nuclear iron-sulfur proteins

    Daili J.A. Netz;Judita Mascarenhas;Oliver Stehling;Antonio J. Pierik

  • The eukaryotic P loop NTPase Nbp35: an essential component of the cytosolic and nuclear iron-sulfur protein assembly machinery.

    Anja Hausmann;Daili J. Aguilar Netz;Janneke Balk;Antonio J. Pierik

  • Osmotically Induced Synthesis of the Compatible Solute Hydroxyectoine Is Mediated by an Evolutionarily Conserved Ectoine Hydroxylase

    Jan Bursy;Antonio J. Pierik;Nathalie Pica;Erhard Bremer

Frequent Co-Authors

Roland Lill
Roland Lill Philipp University of Marburg
Wilfred R. Hagen
Wilfred R. Hagen Delft University of Technology
Wolfgang Buckel
Wolfgang Buckel Philipp University of Marburg
Ulrich Mühlenhoff
Ulrich Mühlenhoff Philipp University of Marburg
Eckhard Bill
Eckhard Bill Max Planck Society
Bernard T. Golding
Bernard T. Golding Newcastle University
Janneke Balk
Janneke Balk John Innes Centre
Cees Veeger
Cees Veeger Wageningen University & Research
Mike S. M. Jetten
Mike S. M. Jetten Radboud University
Julius Lukeš
Julius Lukeš Czech Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Antonio J. Pierik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles