World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Russell A. Matthews

Russell A. Matthews

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7775 7254 4175 3795 119 9732

Russell A. Matthews publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Russell A. Matthews between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Russell A. Matthews published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2016. 1 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2016. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 12 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
2003 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Russell A. Matthews: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 2
2009 1
2010 12
2011 6
2012 10
2013 5
2014 15
2015 4
2016 16
2017 4
2018 13
2019 15
2020 15
2021 9
2022 10
2023 5
2024 0
2025 1
Total 148
Download as CSV

Russell A. Matthews publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell A. Matthews sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 119
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Russell A. Matthews D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell A. Matthews sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Russell A. Matthews is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States and specializes in social sciences and business, management, and accounting. Their research primarily focuses on organizational behavior, human resource management, and work-family balance challenges.

The main topics covered in Russell A. Matthews's work include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology

Within the broader fields of social sciences and business, their subfields of study are:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Gender Studies
  • General Health Professions
  • Clinical Psychology

Russell A. Matthews has a diverse publication record with frequent contributions to several academic journals. The most common publication venues include:

  • Journal of Business and Psychology
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Work Aging and Retirement

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Russell A. Matthews are:

  • "Normalizing the Use of Single-Item Measures: Validation of the Single-Item Compendium for Organizational Psychology," 2022, Journal of Business and Psychology
  • "Resign or carry-on? District and principal leadership as drivers of change in teacher turnover intentions during the COVID-19 crisis: A latent growth model examination," 2022, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • "Changes to the work-family interface during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining predictors and implications using latent transition analysis," 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology (authored by Hoda Vaziri, frequently cited in the field)

Frequent co-authors associated with Russell A. Matthews include:

  • Julie Holliday Wayne
  • Wendy J. Casper
  • Yeong-hyun Hong
  • Marilyn V. Whitman
  • Claire E. Smith

Best Publications

  • Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research.

    Gwenith G. Fisher;Russell A. Matthews;Alyssa Mitchell Gibbons

  • Exploring the Association between Teachers' Perceived Student Misbehaviour and Emotional Exhaustion: The Importance of Teacher Efficacy Beliefs and Emotion Regulation.

    Costas N. Tsouloupas;Russell L. Carson;Russell Matthews;Matthew J. Grawitch

  • Work and personal life boundary management: boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum

    Carrie A. Bulger;Russell A. Matthews;Mark E. Hoffman

  • How Work–Family Research Can Finally Have an Impact in Organizations

    Ellen Ernst Kossek;Boris B. Baltes;Russell A. Matthews

  • Family-supportive organization perceptions and organizational commitment: The mediating role of work–family conflict and enrichment and partner attitudes.

    Julie Holliday Wayne;Wendy J. Casper;Russell A. Matthews;Tammy D. Allen

  • How do occupational stressor-strain effects vary with time? A review and meta-analysis of the relevance of time lags in longitudinal studies

    Michael T. Ford;Russell A. Matthews;Jessica D. Wooldridge;Vipanchi Mishra

  • A short, valid, predictive measure of work-family conflict: item selection and scale validation.

    Russell A. Matthews;Lisa M. Kath;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • The organizational empowerment scale

    Russell A. Matthews;Wendy Michelle Diaz;Steven G. Cole

  • Advancing measurement of work and family domain boundary characteristics

    Russell A. Matthews;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;Carrie A. Bulger

  • Toward a more psychometrically sound brief measure of schizotypal traits: introducing the SPQ-Brief Revised.

    Alex S. Cohen;Russell A. Matthews;Gina M. Najolia;Laura A. Brown

  • A work-family conflict/subjective well-being process model: a test of competing theories of longitudinal effects.

    Russell A. Matthews;Julie Holliday Wayne;Michael T. Ford

  • Work social supports, role stressors, and work–family conflict: The moderating effect of age

    Russell A. Matthews;Carrie A. Bulger;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Development and initial evaluation of an enhanced measure of boundary flexibility for the work and family domains.

    Russell A Matthews;Janet L Barnes-Farrell

  • Work-to-relationship conflict: crossover effects in dual-earner couples.

    Russell A. Matthews;Regan E. Del Priore;Linda K. Acitelli;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Family-supportive supervisor behaviors, work engagement, and subjective well-being: a contextually dependent mediated process.

    Russell A. Matthews;Maura J. Mills;Rachel C. Trout;Lucy English

  • A longitudinal examination of role overload and work-family conflict: The mediating role of interdomain transitions

    Russell A. Matthews;Doan E. Winkel;Julie Holliday Wayne

  • The Relationships of Working Memory, Secondary Memory, and General Fluid Intelligence: Working Memory is Special

    Jill Talley Shelton;Emily M. Elliott;Russell A. Matthews;B. D. Hill

  • An eye for an eye? Exploring the relationship between workplace incivility experiences and perpetration.

    Jessica A. Gallus;Jennifer A. Bunk;Russell A. Matthews;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Emotional exhaustion, absenteeism, and turnover intentions in childcare teachers: examining the impact of physical activity behaviors.

    Russell L. Carson;Jennifer J. Baumgartner;Russell A. Matthews;Costas N. Tsouloupas

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell University of Connecticut
Gwenith G. Fisher
Gwenith G. Fisher Colorado State University
Wendy J. Casper
Wendy J. Casper The University of Texas at Arlington
Alex S. Cohen
Alex S. Cohen Louisiana State University
Julia D. Buckner
Julia D. Buckner Louisiana State University
Boris B. Baltes
Boris B. Baltes Wayne State University
Steve M. Jex
Steve M. Jex Bowling Green State University
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus
Jeffrey H. Greenhaus Drexel University
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
Scott Highhouse
Scott Highhouse Bowling Green State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a major opens the door to a wide variety of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. With increasing demand for mental health professionals, many students are considering roles such as mental health counselors, therapists, and social workers. Online psychology programs offer the flexibility to study from anywhere, making it easier to balance education with work or personal commitments.

Understanding the pathway to specific careers is crucial. For example, if you’re interested in learning how to how to become a mental health counselor in Norfolk, or wish to know the steps to become a mental health counselor in Newark, specialized guidance for licensure, internships, and continuing education is key.

Career opportunities can vary by location. Those looking to become a mental health counselor in North Las Vegas or become a mental health counselor in Oakland may follow different local requirements and job market trends.

Whether you are just starting or advancing your career, researching online degree options and understanding local pathways can help you make informed decisions and succeed in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Russell A. Matthews

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles