World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 30 11328 10590 5922 5398 99 4766

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet L. Barnes-Farrell between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet L. Barnes-Farrell published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2010. 6 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2010. 1980: 4 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications
1980 2024

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 4
1981 0
1982 2
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 5
1990 1
1991 3
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 3
1997 3
1998 0
1999 2
2000 1
2001 1
2002 3
2003 2
2004 1
2005 3
2006 4
2007 4
2008 5
2009 9
2010 14
2011 6
2012 7
2013 9
2014 5
2015 6
2016 3
2017 11
2018 3
2019 4
2020 4
2021 8
2022 2
2023 3
2024 3
Total 148
Download as CSV

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell publications per year - data summary

  • Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, a Psychology scholar from University of Connecticut, has 148 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2024.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1984, 1990, 1993, 2000 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 9 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1981, 1983, 1985, 1986 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.1 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2020-2024) hold 20 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1994: 19 publications (1.3 per year); 1995-2009: 41 publications (2.7 per year); 2010-2024: 88 publications (5.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet L. Barnes-Farrell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 99 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 99
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, a Psychology scholar from University of Connecticut, records 99 publications - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Janet L. Barnes-Farrell ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet L. Barnes-Farrell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 30
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, a Psychology scholar from University of Connecticut, records 30 D-Index - the 1st percentile of the discipline.
  • 1% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Janet L. Barnes-Farrell, and about 99% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Janet L. Barnes-Farrell ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on psychology and health professions. Subfields of study include general health professions, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, organizational behavior and human resource management, and demography.

The scientist's work concentrates on topics such as workplace health and well-being, sleep and work-related fatigue, retirement, disability, and employment, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, traffic and road safety, and aging and gerontology research.

Frequent publication venues for their work include the Journal of Business and Psychology, Work Aging and Retirement, Chronobiology International, Occupational Health Science, and the Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell's recent papers cover a range of issues related to workplace behavior, motivation, and health outcomes. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Understanding the role of organizational personality and social identity concerns on initial recruitment outcomes," 2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • "Bringing Self-Determination Theory to the Forefront: Examining How Human Resource Practices Motivate Employees of All Ages to Succeed," 2024, Journal of Business and Psychology
  • "An Examination of the Predictive Validity of Subjective Age and Core Self-evaluations on Performance-Related Outcomes," 2021, Work Aging and Retirement
  • "The development and initial validation of a new working time scale for full-time workers with non-standard schedules," 2022, BMC Public Health
  • "Examining the Relationship between Experienced Workplace Incivility and Aggressive Driving Behaviors on the Work-to-Home Commute," 2023, Journal of Business and Psychology

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including Rick A. Laguerre, Jennifer M. Cavallari, Alicia G. Dugan, Jennifer L. Garza, and Martin G. Cherniack.

Janet L. Barnes-Farrell was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • A short, valid, predictive measure of work-family conflict: item selection and scale validation.

    Russell A. Matthews;Lisa M. Kath;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Performance Appraisal Process Research in the 1980s: What Has It Contributed to Appraisals in Use?

    Daniel R. Ilgen;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;David B. McKellin

  • Advancing measurement of work and family domain boundary characteristics

    Russell A. Matthews;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;Carrie A. Bulger

  • Perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation: A follow-up.

    Frank J. Landy;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;Jeanette N. Cleveland

  • Individual and Work Factors Related to Perceived Work Ability and Labor Force Outcomes

    Alyssa K. McGonagle;Gwenith G. Fisher;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;James W. Grosch

  • Work social supports, role stressors, and work–family conflict: The moderating effect of age

    Russell A. Matthews;Carrie A. Bulger;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Development and initial evaluation of an enhanced measure of boundary flexibility for the work and family domains.

    Russell A Matthews;Janet L Barnes-Farrell

  • Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Work-to-relationship conflict: crossover effects in dual-earner couples.

    Russell A. Matthews;Regan E. Del Priore;Linda K. Acitelli;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • An eye for an eye? Exploring the relationship between workplace incivility experiences and perpetration.

    Jessica A. Gallus;Jennifer A. Bunk;Russell A. Matthews;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • The Stepladder Technique: An Alternative Group Structure Facilitating Effective Group Decision Making

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;Charles A. Lowe

  • Relationships between psychological safety climate facets and safety behavior in the rail industry: A dominance analysis

    Stephanie L. Morrow;Stephanie L. Morrow;Alyssa K. McGonagle;Megan L. Dove-Steinkamp;Curtis T. Walker

  • What aspects of shiftwork influence off-shift well-being of healthcare workers?

    Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;Kimberly Davies-Schrils;Alyssa McGonagle;benjamin Walsh

  • Accommodation in the workplace

    Jeanette N. Cleveland;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;Joan M. Ratz

  • Statistical control of halo error in performance ratings.

    Frank J. Landy;Robert J. Vance;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;James W. Steele

  • Chronic illness in the workplace: stigma, identity threat and strain.

    Alyssa K. McGonagle;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Work Hours and Work–Family Conflict: The Double‐edged Sword of Involvement in Work and Family

    Russell A. Matthews;Cathleen A. Swody;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Trait Judgments of Stay‐At‐Home and Employed Parents: A Function of Social Role and/or Shifting Standards?

    Judith S. Bridges;Claire Etaugh;Janet Barnes-Farrell

  • The impact of night work on subjective reports of well-being: an exploratory study of health care workers from five nations

    Donald I Tepas;Janet L Barnes-Farrell;Natalia Bobko;Frida M Fischer

  • Gender Discrimination in Organizations

    Jeanette N. Cleveland;Theresa K. Vescio;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell A. Matthews
Russell A. Matthews University of Alabama
Jeanette N. Cleveland
Jeanette N. Cleveland Colorado State University
Frank J. Landy
Frank J. Landy Pennsylvania State University
Steven G. Rogelberg
Steven G. Rogelberg University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Jeffrey M. Stanton
Jeffrey M. Stanton Syracuse University
Gwenith G. Fisher
Gwenith G. Fisher Colorado State University
Boris B. Baltes
Boris B. Baltes Wayne State University
Charles E. Lance
Charles E. Lance University of the Western Cape
Philip L. Roth
Philip L. Roth Clemson University
John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to a wide range of opportunities, from counseling and therapy to research and teaching. Online psychology degrees now provide flexible options for students who want to balance their studies with other commitments while preparing for licensure and professional growth.

Each state—and sometimes even specific cities—has unique pathways and educational requirements for becoming a licensed mental health professional. For example, those interested in practicing in Colorado can review the Colorado Springs licensed therapist requirements, while aspirants in Ohio should consult the Columbus licensed therapist requirements.

Similarly, the Corpus Christi licensed therapist education requirements and the Dallas licensed therapist requirements outline the specific credentials and supervised training needed to practice in Texas.

Understanding these region-specific requirements is crucial as you map out your education and career pathway in psychology. Be sure to research your target location to ensure your chosen degree program aligns with licensing regulations, giving you the best foundation for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles