World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeffrey M. Stanton

Jeffrey M. Stanton

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4913 4553 2328 2119 113 10954

Jeffrey M. Stanton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey M. Stanton between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey M. Stanton published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2003. 1 of the 127 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2003. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1970 2025

127 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey M. Stanton: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 4
2001 3
2002 8
2003 14
2004 10
2005 5
2006 9
2007 5
2008 8
2009 6
2010 6
2011 9
2012 2
2013 4
2014 4
2015 4
2016 2
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 4
2021 4
2022 8
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 127
Download as CSV

Jeffrey M. Stanton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey M. Stanton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 113 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 113
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey M. Stanton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey M. Stanton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeffrey M. Stanton is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States. The researcher's work spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Computer Science and Social Sciences, with notable contributions in subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Their research covers a variety of topics, with a significant emphasis on Topic Modeling, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection. Additional interests include Multimodal Machine Learning Applications, Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials, Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research, and Complex Systems and Decision Making.

Jeffrey M. Stanton has published in various venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Organizational Research Methods
  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Energy Research & Social Science
  • Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Stanton include:

  • Evaluating Equivalence and Confirming the Null in the Organizational Sciences (2020), Organizational Research Methods
  • TVShowGuess: Character Comprehension in Stories as Speaker Guessing (2022), Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Proceeding with caution: Drivers and obstacles to electric utility adoption of smart grids in the United States (2022), Energy Research & Social Science
  • Risks, benefits, and control of information: Two studies of smart electric meter privacy (2020), Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • A Survey of Machine Narrative Reading Comprehension Assessments (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators include Yisi Sang, Xiangyang Mou, Jing Li, and Mo Yu. The collaboration with Yisi Sang is the most recurrent, reflecting their joint efforts on natural language processing and machine comprehension assessments.

Best Publications

  • Introduction: Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Analysis of end user security behaviors

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;Kathryn R. Stam;Paul Mastrangelo;Jeffrey Jolton

  • AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF DATA COLLECTION USING THE INTERNET

    Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • ISSUES AND STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING THE LENGTH OF SELF-REPORT SCALES

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;Evan F. Sinar;William K. Balzer;Patricia C. Smith

  • A General Measure of Work Stress: The Stress in General Scale

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;William K. Balzer;Patricia C. Smith;Luis Fernando Parra

  • Reactions to Employee Performance Monitoring: Framework, Review, and Research Directions

    Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Shorter can Also be Better: The Abridged Job in General Scale

    Steven S. Russell;Christiane Spitzmüller;Lilly F. Lin;Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Religion An Overlooked Dimension in Cross-Cultural Psychology

    Nalini Tarakeshwar;Jeffrey Stanton;Kenneth I. Pargament

  • A lengthy look at the daily grind: time series analysis of events, mood, stress, and satisfaction.

    Julie A. Fuller;Jeffrey M. Stanton;Gwenith G. Fisher;Christiane Spitzmüller

  • Development of a Compact Measure of Job Satisfaction: The Abridged Job Descriptive Index

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;Evan F. Sinar;William K. Balzer;Amanda L. Julian

  • Using Internet/Intranet Web Pages to Collect Organizational Research Data:

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;Steven G. Rogelberg

  • Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse

    Steven G. Rogelberg;Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Galton, Pearson, and the Peas: A Brief History of Linear Regression for Statistics Instructors

    Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell

  • Company profile of the frequent internet user

    Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Organizational Cultures of Libraries as a Strategic Resource

    Michelle L. Kaarst-Brown;Scott Nicholson;Gisela M. von Dran;Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists' data-sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis

    Youngseek Kim;Jeffrey M. Stanton

  • Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploratory study of employees' experiences with new types of surveillance

    J.M Stanton;E.M Weiss

  • Information Technology, Privacy, and Power within Organizations: a view from Boundary Theory and Social Exchange perspectives.

    Jeffrey M. Stanton;Kathryn R. Stam

  • Designing and implementing culturally-sensitive IT applications: The interaction of culture values and privacy issues in the Middle East

    Norhayati Zakaria;Jeffrey M. Stanton;Shreya T.M. Sarkar‐Barney

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven G. Rogelberg
Steven G. Rogelberg University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Jason Dedrick
Jason Dedrick Syracuse University
Gail Ironson
Gail Ironson University of Miami
Gwenith G. Fisher
Gwenith G. Fisher Colorado State University
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell University of Connecticut
Charlie L. Reeve
Charlie L. Reeve University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Kenneth I. Pargament
Kenneth I. Pargament Bowling Green State University
Scott Highhouse
Scott Highhouse Bowling Green State University
David C. Mohr
David C. Mohr Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a variety of impactful opportunities, especially with the flexibility of online education. Many students consider cacrep accredited counseling programs to become licensed counselors in schools, community agencies, or private practice. These programs focus on mental health, career guidance, and rehabilitation.

For those interested in family dynamics and relationship support, accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited offer specialized training. Graduates often work in clinical settings, offering therapy to couples and families experiencing challenges.

A degree in psychology remains a popular choice, as many affordable online psychology degrees prepare students for roles in research, clinical practice, human resources, and more. Psychology graduates find pathways in both the public and private sectors.

If your interest lies in social welfare and advocacy, the online master's in social work is a practical path toward community organization, policy analysis, and counseling roles. Online programs make these careers more accessible, allowing you to balance study with work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey M. Stanton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles