World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
8739
World Ranking
6380
National Ranking
3072

Frank J. Landy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J. Landy sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 77 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Frank J. Landy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J. Landy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank J. Landy was affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their academic career involved engagement in various research activities within their field, though specific subfields, topics, or areas of study have not been detailed.

Although no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or consistent publication venues are listed, the scientist's contributions were associated with Pennsylvania State University, indicating an institutional connection to research and academic scholarship during their career.

There is no available information on book publications or awards won. As such, it is not possible to outline particular recognitions or published monographs linked to this scientist.

The absence of detailed data regarding research topics, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or papers prevents a deeper examination of the specific academic focus or collaborative networks that might have characterized their work.

Their career and research activities are understood solely through their institutional affiliation and the fact that they are deceased, reflecting the historical nature of their academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • Work in the 21st Century: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology

    Frank J. Landy;Jeffrey M. Conte

  • The Measurement of Work Performance: Methods, Theory, and Applications

    Frank J. Landy;James L. Farr

  • Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation.

    Frank J. Landy;Janet L. Barnes;Kevin R. Murphy

  • Some historical and scientific issues related to research on emotional intelligence

    Frank J. Landy

  • High reliability process industries: Individual, micro, and macro organizational influences on safety performance

    David A. Hofmann;Rick R. Jacobs;Frank Landy

  • Time urgency: The construct and its measurement.

    Frank J. Landy;Haleh Rastegary;Julian Thayer;Caran Colvin

  • Perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation: A follow-up.

    Frank J. Landy;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;Jeanette N. Cleveland

  • Stamp collecting versus science: Validation as hypothesis testing.

    Unknown

  • The effects of person and job stereotypes on two personnel decisions.

    Jeanette N. Cleveland;Frank J. Landy

  • Stereotypes, Bias, and Personnel Decisions: Strange and Stranger

    Unknown

  • Performance Measurement and Theory

    Frank Landy;Sheldon Zedeck;Jeanette Cleveland

  • Utility concepts in performance measurement

    Frank J. Landy;James L. Farr;Rick R. Jacobs

  • Time urgency : conceptual and construct development

    Jeffrey M. Conte;Frank J. Landy;John E. Mathieu

  • The Interactions among Time Urgency, Uncertainty, and Time Pressure

    Haleh Rastegary;Frank J. Landy

  • The Influence of Rater and Ratee Age on Two Performance Judgments.

    Jeanette N. Cleveland;Frank J. Landy

  • Work in the 21st Century : An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology Ed. 3

    Frank J. Landy;Jeffrey M. Conte

  • An opponent process theory of job satisfaction.

    Frank J. Landy

  • Job analysis: The composition of SME samples.

    Frank J. Landy;Joseph Vasey

  • Statistical control of halo error in performance ratings.

    Frank J. Landy;Robert J. Vance;Janet L. Barnes-Farrell;James W. Steele

  • Work in the 21st Century

    Frank J. Landy;Jeffrey M. Conte

  • A Factor Analysis of the Fear Survey Schedule-III

    Frank J. Landy;Larry A. Gaupp

  • Advancing Age and the Cardiorespiratory Stress of Fire Suppression: Determining a Minimum Standard for Aerobic Fitness

    Mark S. Sothmann;Kurt W. Saupe;Deborah Jasenof;Joseph Blaney

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanette N. Cleveland
Jeanette N. Cleveland Colorado State University
John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell
Janet L. Barnes-Farrell University of Connecticut
David A. Hofmann
David A. Hofmann University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
James Campbell Quick
James Campbell Quick The University of Texas at Arlington
Sheldon Zedeck
Sheldon Zedeck University of California, Berkeley
Stephan J. Motowidlo
Stephan J. Motowidlo Rice University
Stanislav V. Kasl
Stanislav V. Kasl Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of flexible online degrees. Prospective students can now earn credentials from anywhere, balancing work and life commitments. Popular options include accelerated, affordable programs designed for rapid career advancement.

For those interested in psychology, the best online masters in psychology can help graduates pursue roles in counseling, human resources, and research. Similarly, education professionals can fast-track their career with accelerated doctoral programs in education online, aimed at those seeking leadership or academic advancement.

If speed and convenience are top priorities, many students look for online master’s programs that can be completed in just one year. For undergraduate studies, accelerated programs provide the opportunity to earn a bachelor’s degree faster than traditional schedules, reducing both tuition costs and time to graduation.

Online learning in these fields not only offers flexibility, but also provides diverse pathways for impactful careers in education, research, public service, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Frank J. Landy

Recently Published Articles