World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6283 5843 3399 3082 161 17597

Walter C. Borman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Walter C. Borman between 1972 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Walter C. Borman published across 51 years, from 1972 to 2022, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2008. 1 of the 234 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2008. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1972 2022

234 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Walter C. Borman: publications per year, 1972 to 2022
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 1
1974 2
1975 6
1976 2
1977 5
1978 8
1979 7
1980 5
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 3
1985 3
1986 4
1987 7
1988 3
1989 4
1990 1
1991 6
1992 3
1993 7
1994 1
1995 5
1996 2
1997 6
1998 7
1999 5
2000 7
2001 13
2002 2
2003 10
2004 10
2005 3
2006 11
2007 14
2008 20
2009 4
2010 4
2011 2
2012 8
2013 0
2014 4
2015 3
2016 0
2017 5
2018 1
2019 0
2020 3
2021 0
2022 1
Total 234
Download as CSV

Walter C. Borman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter C. Borman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 161 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 161
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Walter C. Borman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter C. Borman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1983 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Walter C. Borman is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology and related subfields. Their work addresses areas such as resilience and mental health, occupational health and safety research, posttraumatic stress disorder research, personality traits, job satisfaction, organizational behavior, leadership, management strategies, and workplace spirituality.

Their recent published papers include the following:

  • Capturing Resilience in Context: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test of Resilience, 2020, Human Performance
  • Beyond task performance: the concept of organizational citizenship performance, 2020, Psihologia Resurselor Umane
  • Beyond task performance: the concept of organizational citizenship performance, 2020, Psihologia Resurselor Umane
  • Situational Judgment Test of Resilience, 2020, PsycTESTS Dataset

Frequent co-authors of Walter C. Borman include:

  • Yuejia Teng
  • Michael Τ. Brannick
  • Dan Ispas

They have contributed to several publication venues, among which the most frequent are:

  • Psihologia Resurselor Umane
  • Human Performance
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Walter C. Borman's research intersects multiple subfields such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Demography

Notable topics covered in their work include:

  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
  • Workplace Spirituality and Leadership

Walter C. Borman was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1983.

Best Publications

  • Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research

    Walter C Borman;Stephan J. Motowidlo

  • A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance

    Stephan J. Motowidlo;Walter C. Borman;Mark J. Schmit

  • Personality predictors of citizenship performance

    Walter C. Borman;Louise A. Penner;Tammy D. Allen;Stephan J. Motowidlo

  • UNDERSTANDING WORK USING THE OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION NETWORK (O*NET): IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

    Norman G. Peterson;Michael D. Mumford;Walter C. Borman;P. Richard Jeanneret

  • Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability

    Elaine D. Pulakos;Neal Schmitt;David W. Dorsey;Sharon Arad

  • Investigating the Underlying Structure of the Citizenship Performance Domain

    Venetta I. Coleman;Walter C. Borman

  • Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings

    Walter C Borman;Leonard A. White;David W. Dorsey

  • An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET.

    Norman G. Peterson;Michael D. Mumford;Walter C. Borman;P. Richard Jeanneret

  • More Progress Toward a Taxonomy of Managerial Performance Requirements

    Walter C Borman;Donald H. Brush

  • Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness.

    Walter C. Borman

  • Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rater errors

    Walter C. Borman

  • Re-Examining Machiavelli: A Three-Dimensional Model of Machiavellianism in the Workplace

    Stacey R. Kessler;Adam C. Bandelli;Paul E. Spector;Walter C. Borman

  • The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach

    Walter C. Borman

  • The Concept of Organizational Citizenship

    Walter C. Borman

  • Models of supervisory job performance ratings

    Walter C. Borman;Leonard A. White;Elaine D. Pulakos;Scott H. Oppler

  • An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales

    Walter C. Borman;Daren E. Buck;Mary Ann Hanson;Stephan J. Motowidlo

  • Examination of Race and Sex Effects on Performance Ratings

    Elaine D. Pulakos;Leonard A. White;Scott H. Oppler;Walter C. Borman

  • Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance

    Walter C. Borman

  • The aging workforce: Realities, myths, and implications for organizations.

    Unknown

  • Effects of instructions to avoid halo error on reliability and validity of performance evaluation ratings.

    Walter C. Borman

  • Exploring upper limits of reliability and validity in job performance ratings.

    Walter C. Borman

  • Personnel Selection and Classification Systems

    Marvin D. Dunnette;Walter Borman

  • Contextual performance and teamwork: Implications for staffing

    Jeffrey A. LePine;Mary Ann Hanson;Walter C. Borman;Stephan J. Motowidlo

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan J. Motowidlo
Stephan J. Motowidlo Rice University
Michael D. Mumford
Michael D. Mumford University of Oklahoma
Daniel R. Ilgen
Daniel R. Ilgen Michigan State University
Marvin D. Dunnette
Marvin D. Dunnette 3M (United States)
Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University
Edwin A. Fleishman
Edwin A. Fleishman George Mason University
Richard J. Klimoski
Richard J. Klimoski George Mason University
Tammy D. Allen
Tammy D. Allen University of South Florida
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Michael A. Campion
Michael A. Campion Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and specialized career pathways. One prominent field is Applied Behavior Analysis, which offers rewarding roles such as Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). These careers often require region-specific credentials, so it's important to review state-by-state requirements before beginning your studies.

For example, those interested in practicing in Wisconsin can check the Madison bcba requirements. If you’re looking at opportunities in Tennessee, it’s essential to understand the Memphis bcba requirements. Students considering roles in Arizona should review the bcba certification requirements in Mesa, while those in Florida should examine the Miami bcba education requirements.

Many online psychology programs offer the flexibility to meet these various requirements while accommodating your schedule. Whether your goal is clinical practice, research, or applied behavior analysis, understanding regional standards will help you take the next step in your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Walter C. Borman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles