What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Social psychology
- Management
- Social science
Richard J. Klimoski spends much of his time researching Social psychology, Teamwork, Performance appraisal, Self evaluation and Training.
His work carried out in the field of Social psychology brings together such families of science as Group cognition, Group mind and Function.
The Teamwork study which covers Team effectiveness that intersects with Schema, Multidimensional scaling and Organizational effectiveness.
As a part of the same scientific family, Richard J. Klimoski mostly works in the field of Schema, focusing on Team cognition and, on occasion, Knowledge management.
Richard J. Klimoski combines subjects such as Quality, Knowledge level and Partial support with his study of Performance appraisal.
His work investigates the relationship between Training and topics such as Career development that intersect with problems in Employee motivation.
His most cited work include:
- Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? (1257 citations)
- Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement (391 citations)
- The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have No Shared Schema (321 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Richard J. Klimoski mainly focuses on Social psychology, Applied psychology, Public relations, Knowledge management and Job performance.
His studies examine the connections between Social psychology and genetics, as well as such issues in Negotiation, with regards to Group conflict.
His research investigates the connection between Applied psychology and topics such as Job satisfaction that intersect with problems in Self-esteem and Employee motivation.
When carried out as part of a general Public relations research project, his work on Leadership studies and Leadership style is frequently linked to work in Perspective, Accountability and Position, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
His Knowledge management research includes themes of Staffing, Industrial and organizational psychology and Personnel selection.
His Job performance research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Organizational behavior and Task.
He most often published in these fields:
- Social psychology (31.52%)
- Applied psychology (19.57%)
- Public relations (16.30%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2007-2019)?
- Public relations (16.30%)
- Context (7.61%)
- Social psychology (31.52%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Public relations, Context, Social psychology, Perspective and Applied psychology.
His work on Leadership style as part of general Public relations research is frequently linked to Empowerment and Editorial board, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Leadership studies and Neuroleadership study in the realm of Leadership style connects with subjects such as Evidence-based education.
Context combines with fields such as Data science, Selection, Turnover, Business environment and Test in his work.
His Perspective studies intersect with other subjects such as Strategic leadership, Prism, Working group, Position and Function.
Richard J. Klimoski has researched Applied psychology in several fields, including Self-knowledge, Self insight, Interpersonal competence and Self-awareness.
Between 2007 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Practicing Evidence-Based Education in Leadership Development (45 citations)
- Benefiting from CEO's empowerment of TMTs: Does CEO–TMT dissimilarity matter? (19 citations)
- Intuiting the Selection Context (11 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Social psychology
- Management
- Social science
His main research concerns Public relations, Context, Leadership style, Perspective and Selection.
His Public relations research integrates issues from Top management, Marketing and Organizational performance.
Richard J. Klimoski integrates several fields in his works, including Context, Social psychology, Business environment and Turnover.
His work on Neuroleadership and Leadership studies as part of general Leadership style research is often related to Evidence-based education, thus linking different fields of science.
His study of Perspective brings together topics like Working group, Position, Function, Management and Staffing.
Selection and Data science are commonly linked in his work.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
