World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
11739
World Ranking
7414
National Ranking
4003

Richard J. Klimoski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Klimoski sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Richard J. Klimoski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Klimoski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1984 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Richard J. Klimoski is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. The primary academic focus surrounds the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, with particular emphasis on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, as well as Information Systems and Management and Strategy and Management.

The research topics associated with Klimoski include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management

Klimoski's recent publications demonstrate a range of collaborative work and diverse subject interests. Recent papers include:

  • Improving internal service: identifying the roles of employee proficiency, adaptivity and proactivity, 2021, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance
  • The Corporate Chief of Staff: Strategic Leadership Influence From Outside the Spotlight, 2024, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
  • IOP volume 14 issue 3 Cover and Front matter, 2021, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Do You Know What I Know: The Role of Context in Enabling, Reducing Knowledge Hiding in Workplace, 2021, Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Behavioral Integration at 30: Progress, Pitfalls and Prospective Directions, 2024, Academy of Management Proceedings

The frequent publication venues where Klimoski's research appears include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance
  • Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Among frequent co-authors are:

  • Nathan J. Hiller
  • Scott L. Martin
  • Alexandra A. Henderson
  • Steven Zhou
  • Stephen J. Zaccaro

Klimoski holds distinctions including being a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), awarded in 1984, and a Dean of Fellow at the Academy of Management, although the specific year for the latter is not specified.

Best Publications

  • Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?

    Richard Klimoski;Susan Mohammed

  • The Measurement of Team Mental Models: We Have No Shared Schema

    Susan Mohammed;Richard Klimoski;Joan R. Rentsch

  • The nature of organizational leadership : understanding the performance imperatives confronting today's leaders

    Stephen J. Zaccaro;Richard J. Klimoski

  • Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement

    Joan R. Rentsch;Richard J. Klimoski

  • The Impact Of Expectations On Newcomer Performance In Teams As Mediated By Work Characteristics, Social Exchanges, And Empowerment

    Gilad Chen;Richard J. Klimoski

  • Entry into Training Programs and Its Effects on Training Outcomes: A Field Experiment

    William D. Hicks;Richard J. Klimoski

  • Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resource management.

    Dwight D. Frink;Richard J. Klimoski

  • Advancing accountability theory and practice: Introduction to the human resource management review special edition

    Dwight D Frink;Richard J Klimoski

  • Training Undergraduates to Work in Organizational Teams

    Gilad Chen;Lisa M. Donahue;Richard J. Klimoski

  • Emotions in the workplace : understanding the structure and role of emotions in organizational behavior

    Robert G. Lord;Richard J. Klimoski;Ruth Kanfer

  • WHY DO ASSESSMENT CENTERS WORK? THE PUZZLE OF ASSESSMENT CENTER VALIDITY

    Richard Klimoski;Mary Brickner

  • Accountability forces in performance appraisal

    Richard Klimoski;Lawrence Inks

  • Role of the rater in performance appraisal.

    Richard J. Klimoski;Manuel London

  • A FIELD STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATIONAL FEEDBACK ENVIRONMENT AND PERFORMANCE

    Thomas E. Becker;Richard J. Klimoski

  • The Interface of Leadership and Team Processes

    Stephen J. Zaccaro;Richard Klimoski

  • The impact of trust on creative problem solving groups.

    Richard J. Klimoski;Barbara L. Karol

  • ASSESSMENT CENTERS—VALID OR MERELY PRESCIENT

    Richard J. Klimoski;William J. Strickland

  • The nature of organizational leadership: An introduction.

    Stephen J. Zaccaro;Richard J. Klimoski

  • Training and development of human resources at work: Is the state of our science strong?

    Gilad Chen;Richard J. Klimoski

  • The effects of intragroup forces on intergroup conflict resolution

    Richard J. Klimoski

  • Client–project manager engagements, trust, and loyalty

    Sheila Simsarian Webber;Richard J. Klimoski

  • Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 12.

    Walter C. Borman;Daniel R. Ilgen;Richard J. Klimoski

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen J. Zaccaro
Stephen J. Zaccaro George Mason University
Gilad Chen
Gilad Chen University of Maryland, College Park
Aaron Cohen
Aaron Cohen University of Haifa
Cheri Ostroff
Cheri Ostroff University of South Australia
Ronald J. Burke
Ronald J. Burke York University
Karin Sanders
Karin Sanders University of New South Wales
Juan I. Sanchez
Juan I. Sanchez Florida International University
Dov Zohar
Dov Zohar Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University
Dean Tjosvold
Dean Tjosvold Lingnan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career paths, particularly in the impactful field of substance abuse counseling. Many students are drawn to this profession for its potential to make a real difference in people’s lives. If you’re interested in this pathway, it’s important to understand the specific educational and certification requirements in your area.

For example, to learn more about how to become a substance abuse counselor in St. Louis, you’ll find that local regulations and training standards play a crucial role in the credentialing process. Similarly, St. Petersburg substance abuse counselor certification requirements highlight the importance of meeting both state and city-specific guidelines.

Each city may have unique qualifications and steps. You can read more about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Stockton, or understand the detailed process for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Tampa.

Pursuing an online psychology degree can offer flexibility while providing a strong foundation for these roles. Be sure to research local licensing and online program accreditation to ensure your chosen path aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Klimoski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles