World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
45815
World Ranking
2751
National Ranking
1584

Steve W. J. Kozlowski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve W. J. Kozlowski sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steve W. J. Kozlowski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve W. J. Kozlowski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve W. J. Kozlowski is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within social sciences, with a strong emphasis on psychology. The scientist's primary disciplinary focus includes psychology and social sciences, supported by subfields such as social psychology, sociology and political science, communication, management science and operations research, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

The main topics of their research cover areas related to team and organizational dynamics, including:

  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Collaboration in agile enterprises
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Space Exploration and Technology

Steve W. J. Kozlowski has contributed to various academic venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Small Group Research
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • Human Relations
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kozlowski include:

  • Leading virtual teams, 2021, Organizational Dynamics
  • Exploring the Dynamic Team Cohesion-Performance and Coordination-Performance Relationships of Newly Formed Teams, 2020, Small Group Research
  • The dynamic nature of interpersonal conflict and psychological strain in extreme work settings, 2021, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • How leader and follower prototypical and antitypical attributes influence ratings of transformational leadership in an extreme context, 2020, Human Relations
  • Multilevel emotional exhaustion: psychosocial safety climate and workplace bullying as higher level contextual and individual explanatory factors, 2021, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Collaborations feature prominently in Kozlowski's body of work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Jeffrey Olenick
  • Chu-Hsiang Chang
  • Ajay Somaraju
  • Georgia T. Chao
  • Michael T. Braun

Best Publications

  • Work Groups and Teams in Organizations

    Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Bradford S. Bell

  • A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.

    Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Katherine J. Klein

  • Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams

    Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Daniel R. Ilgen

  • Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions

    Katherine J. Klein;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership

    Bradford S. Bell;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research

    Katherine J. Klein;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • ORGANIZATIONAL SOCIALIZATION AS A LEARNING PROCESS: THE ROLE OF INFORMATION ACQUISITION

    Cheri Ostroff;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • Integration of climate and leadership: Examination of a neglected issue.

    Steve W J Kozlowski;Mary L. Doherty

  • Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability.

    Bradford S. Bell;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • Leading virtual teams: hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership.

    Julia E. Hoch;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF NEWCOMER EXPECTATIONS, EARLY SOCIALIZATION OUTCOMES, AND THE MODERATING EFFECTS OF ROLE DEVELOPMENT FACTORS

    Debra A. Major;Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Georgia T. Chao;Philip D. Gardner

  • A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance.

    Richard P. DeShon;Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Aaron M. Schmidt;Karen R. Milner

  • A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus.

    Steve W J Kozlowski;Keith Hattrup

  • Embedding Ethical Leadership within and across Organization Levels

    John Schaubroeck;Sean T. Hannah;Bruce J. Avolio;Steve W. J. Kozlowski

  • Effects of Training Goals and Goal Orientation Traits on Multidimensional Training Outcomes and Performance Adaptability.

    Steve W.J. Kozlowski;Stanley M. Gully;Kenneth G. Brown;Eduardo Salas

  • Goal orientation and ability: interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge.

    Bradford S Bell;Steve W J Kozlowski

  • The Role of Mentoring in the Information Gathering Processes of Newcomers during Early Organizational Socialization

    Cheri Ostroff;Steve W.J. Kozlowski

  • Advancing Multilevel Research Design Capturing the Dynamics of Emergence

    Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Georgia T. Chao;James A. Grand;Michael T. Braun

  • AN EXPLORATION OF CLIMATES FOR TECHNICAL UPDATING AND PERFORMANCE

    Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Brian M. Hults

  • Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions.

    Katherine J. Klein;Paul D. Bliese;Steve W. Kozlowski;Fred Dansereau

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard P. DeShon
Richard P. DeShon Michigan State University
Eduardo Salas
Eduardo Salas Rice University
Bruce J. Avolio
Bruce J. Avolio University of Washington
Chu-Hsiang Chang
Chu-Hsiang Chang Michigan State University
Linda Klebe Treviño
Linda Klebe Treviño Pennsylvania State University
Robert G. Lord
Robert G. Lord Durham University
Sean T. Hannah
Sean T. Hannah Wake Forest University
Cheri Ostroff
Cheri Ostroff University of South Australia
John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut
J. Kevin Ford
J. Kevin Ford Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree programs and career pathways, especially in counseling and therapy fields. An increasingly popular career choice is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). However, aspiring LPCs need to be aware that licensure requirements vary greatly by state.

For example, if you’re interested in learning about lpc licensure requirements in New Hampshire, you’ll find specific education, examination, and supervised experience rules you must follow. Similarly, understanding the New Jersey licensed professional counselor requirements is crucial for anyone planning to practice in that state.

Every state has its own pathway. Those pursuing counseling in the Southwest should review how to get an lpc license in New Mexico. Likewise, becoming a counselor in the Northeast requires understanding the New York lpc licensure requirements.

Before committing to a program, research both educational offerings and professional requirements in your desired state. These steps ensure your online degree leads to a successful career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Steve W. J. Kozlowski

Trending Scientists