World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7414 6915 4007 3643 97 11374

Chu-Hsiang Chang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chu-Hsiang Chang between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chu-Hsiang Chang published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2017. 11 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2017. 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
2006 2025

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chu-Hsiang Chang: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 3
2007 1
2008 3
2009 3
2010 4
2011 5
2012 10
2013 9
2014 3
2015 8
2016 5
2017 13
2018 8
2019 8
2020 6
2021 8
2022 8
2023 8
2024 5
2025 6
Total 124
Download as CSV

Chu-Hsiang Chang publications per year - data summary

  • Chu-Hsiang Chang, a Psychology scholar from Michigan State University, has 124 publications recorded across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2006 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2007, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 6.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.2 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 35 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2006-2012: 29 publications (4.1 per year); 2013-2019: 54 publications (7.7 per year); 2020-2025: 41 publications (6.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Chu-Hsiang Chang publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chu-Hsiang Chang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 97
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Chu-Hsiang Chang publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Chu-Hsiang Chang, a Psychology scholar from Michigan State University, records 97 publications - the 18th percentile of the discipline.
  • 18% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Chu-Hsiang Chang, and about 82% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Chu-Hsiang Chang ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Chu-Hsiang Chang D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chu-Hsiang Chang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Chu-Hsiang Chang D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Chu-Hsiang Chang, a Psychology scholar from Michigan State University, records 42 D-Index - the 36th percentile of the discipline.
  • 36% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Chu-Hsiang Chang, and about 64% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Chu-Hsiang Chang ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Chu-Hsiang Chang is a researcher affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with specific attention to subfields such as sociology and political science, social psychology, demography, general health professions, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

Their research focuses on several main topics that include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Technology Use by Older Adults

Chang has contributed research to various prominent publication venues. The most frequent venues for their publications are:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Work Aging and Retirement
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • Occupational Health Science

Prominent recent papers authored by or involving Chang include:

  • "Supporting interdependent telework employees: A moderated-mediation model linking daily COVID-19 task setbacks to next-day work withdrawal," 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "Making daily decisions to work from home or to work in the office: The impacts of daily work- and COVID-related stressors on next-day work location," 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "Positive family events facilitate effective leader behaviors at work: A within-individual investigation of family-work enrichment," 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "The dynamic nature of interpersonal conflict and psychological strain in extreme work settings," 2021, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • "Employees' reactions toward COVID-19 information exposure: Insights from terror management theory and generativity theory," 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology

Chang frequently collaborates with several coauthors, indicating ongoing research partnerships. Notable collaborators include:

  • Jenna A. Van Fossen
  • Shelia R. Cotten
  • Jeffrey Olenick
  • Steve W. J. Kozlowski
  • Elizabeth A. Mack

Best Publications

  • A Review of Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs at Work

    Anja Van den Broeck;Anja Van den Broeck;D. Lance Ferris;Chu Hsiang Chang;Christopher C. Rosen

  • The Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Attitudes, Strain, and Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Examination

    Chu-Hsiang Chang;Christopher C. Rosen;Paul E. Levy

  • Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis.

    Klodiana Lanaj;Chu Hsiang Daisy Chang;Russell E. Johnson

  • Core Self-Evaluations: A Review and Evaluation of the Literature

    Chu Hsiang Chang;D. Lance Ferris;Russell E. Johnson;Christopher C. Rosen

  • Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analysis.

    Erin M. Eatough;Chu Hsiang Chang;Stephanie A. Miloslavic;Russell E. Johnson

  • Commitment and Motivation at Work: the Relevance of Employee Identity and Regulatory Focus

    Russell E. Johnson;Chu Hsiang Chang;Liu Qin Yang

  • Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational, consideration, and abusive leadership behaviors

    Russell E. Johnson;Merlijn Venus;Klodiana Lanaj;Changguo Mao

  • Work-family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and displaced aggression toward others: the moderating roles of workplace interpersonal conflict and perceived managerial family support.

    Yihao Liu;Ming Wang;Chu-Hsiang Chang;Junqi Shi

  • Let’s Make a Deal: Development and Validation of the Ex Post I-Deals Scale

    Christopher C. Rosen;Daniel J. Slater;Chu Hsiang Chang;Russell E. Johnson

  • Understanding the link between psychosocial work stressors and work-related musculoskeletal complaints.

    Erin M. Eatough;Jason D. Way;Chu Hsiang Chang

  • “I” is to continuance as “We” is to affective: the relevance of the self‐concept for organizational commitment

    Russell E. Johnson;Chu Hsiang Chang

  • Moving from cognition to behavior: What the research says.

    Russell E. Johnson;Chu Hsiang Chang;Robert G. Lord

  • Perceptions of the organizational context and psychological contract breach: Assessing competing perspectives

    Christopher C. Rosen;Chu Hsiang Chang;Russell E. Johnson;Paul E. Levy

  • Recommendations for improving the construct clarity of higher-order multidimensional constructs

    Russell E. Johnson;Christopher C. Rosen;Chu Hsiang Daisy Chang;Emilija Djurdjevic

  • The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: A daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work.

    Hun Whee Lee;Jacob Bradburn;Russell E Johnson;Szu-Han Joanna Lin

  • To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate: Steps for Developing and Validating Higher-Order Multidimensional Constructs

    Russell E. Johnson;Christopher C. Rosen;Chu Hsiang Chang

  • Organizational violence and aggression: Development of the three-factor Violence Climate Survey.

    Stacey R. Kessler;Paul E. Spector;Chu Hsiang Chang;Alissa D. Parr

  • Emotional strain and organizational citizenship behaviours: A meta-analysis and review

    Chu Hsiang Chang;Russell E. Johnson;Liu Qin Yang

  • Psychosocial precursors and physical consequences of workplace violence towards nurses: A longitudinal examination with naturally occurring groups in hospital settings

    Liu Qin Yang;Paul E. Spector;Chu Hsiang Daisy Chang;Mary Gallant-Roman

  • Eating your feelings? Testing a model of employees' work-related stressors, sleep quality, and unhealthy eating

    Yihao Liu;Yifan Song;Jaclyn Koopmann;Mo Wang

  • Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Citizenship Behaviors: Conscientiousness and Self-monitoring as Moderators

    Chu Hsiang Chang;Christopher C. Rosen;Gina M. Siemieniec;Russell E. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell E. Johnson
Russell E. Johnson Michigan State University
Christopher C. Rosen
Christopher C. Rosen University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Steve W. J. Kozlowski
Steve W. J. Kozlowski University of South Florida
Paul E. Spector
Paul E. Spector University of South Florida
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Junqi Shi
Junqi Shi Zhejiang University
Leslie B. Hammer
Leslie B. Hammer Oregon Health & Science University
Paul E. Levy
Paul E. Levy University of Akron
Irvin Sam Schonfeld
Irvin Sam Schonfeld City University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens numerous doors to rewarding careers in mental health, counseling, and therapy. For those considering online degrees, there are pathways that support flexible learning and professional growth. When exploring this field, it’s important to research each state’s unique licensing and degree requirements.

For example, becoming a speech therapist in Wyoming involves specific educational credentials, supervised experience, and exams. For students interested in family dynamics and relationships, marriage and family therapy offers diverse opportunities. The Albuquerque mft education requirements outline the necessary steps for practice in New Mexico, while there are tailored guides for how to become an mft in Anaheim and how to become an mft in Anchorage.

Exploring related online degrees can lead to specialized roles, whether you’re interested in clinical therapy, speech language pathology, or family counseling. Each path requires careful planning, but with the right degree and licensure, a fulfilling psychology career is within reach.

Best Scientists Citing Chu-Hsiang Chang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles