World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
7396
World Ranking
7082
National Ranking
2529

Paul H. Glaser publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Glaser sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 116 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Paul H. Glaser D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Glaser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul H. Glaser is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental and earth sciences, with a significant emphasis on peatlands and wetlands ecology, as well as related subfields such as ecology, atmospheric science, and environmental engineering.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics including peatlands and wetlands ecology, coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics, geology and paleoclimatology research, groundwater flow and contamination studies, climate change and permafrost, and fire effects on ecosystems.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Paul H. Glaser cover various aspects of peatland hydrology and carbon dynamics. Some of these include:

  • A unified explanation for the morphology of raised peatlands, 2023, Nature
  • The hydraulic conductivity of peat with respect to scaling, botanical composition, and greenhouse gas transport: Mini-aquifer tests from the Red Lake Peatland, Minnesota, 2020, Journal of Hydrology
  • Tropical peatland carbon storage linked to global latitudinal trends in peat recalcitrance, 2020, MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
  • LARGE PEAT BASINS AS INCUBATORS OF METHANE AND CARBON DIOXIDE: A GEOCHEMICAL PERSPECTIVE, 2021, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Paul H. Glaser frequently publishes with multiple co-authors, indicating collaboration across various projects. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Ale×ander R. Cobb
  • René Dommain
  • Charles F. Harvey
  • A. S. Reeve
  • Jeffrey P. Chanton

The publication venues for Glaser's work span several reputable journals and society programs, illustrating active engagement with the scientific community. These venues include:

  • Nature
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

The main fields of study they contribute to are:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, subfield contributions are recorded as:

  • Ecology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Global and Planetary Change

Best Publications

  • Piston corers for peat and lake sediments

    H. E. Wright;D. H. Mann;P. H. Glaser

  • The patterned mires of the Red Lake Peatland, northern Minnesota: vegetation, water chemistry, and landforms

    Paul H. Glaser;Gerald A. Wheeler;Eville Gorham;Herbert E. Wright

  • THE RESPONSE OF VEGETATION TO CHEMICAL AND HYDROLOGICAL GRADIENTS IN THE LOST RIVER PEATLAND, NORTHERN MINNESOTA

    Paul H. Glaser;Jan A. Janssens;Donald I. Siegel

  • Radiocarbon and stable carbon isotopic evidence for transport and transformation of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved inorganic carbon, and CH4 in a northern Minnesota peatland

    L. S. Chasar;J. P. Chanton;Paul H Glaser;D. I. Siegel

  • Surface Deformations as Indicators of Deep Ebullition Fluxes in a Large Northern Peatland

    P. H. Glaser;J. P. Chanton;P. Morin;D. O. Rosenberry

  • Groundwater flow in a bog- fen complex, Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota.

    Unknown

  • Simulating vertical flow in large peatlands

    A.S Reeve;D.I Siegel;P.H Glaser

  • Tropical peatland carbon storage linked to global latitudinal trends in peat recalcitrance

    Suzanne B. Hodgkins;Curtis J. Richardson;René Dommain;Hongjun Wang

  • Radiocarbon Evidence for the Importance of Surface Vegetation on Fermentation and Methanogenesis in Contrasting Types of Boreal Peatlands

    J. P. Chanton;P. H. Glaser;L. S. Chasar;D. J. Burdige

  • Climate-driven flushing of pore water in peatlands

    D. I. Siegel;A. S. Reeve;Paul H Glaser;E. A. Romanowicz

  • Methane Concentration and Stable Isotope Distribution as Evidence of Rhizospheric Processes: Comparison of a Fen and Bog in the Glacial Lake Agassiz Peatland Complex

    L. S. Chasar;J. P. Chanton;Paul H Glaser;D. I. Siegel

  • Carbon storage and release in Indonesian peatlands since the last deglaciation

    René Dommain;John Couwenberg;Paul H. Glaser;Hans Joosten

  • Regional linkages between raised bogs and the climate, groundwater, and landscape of north-western Minnesota

    Paul H. Glaser;Donald I. Siegel;Edwin A. Romanowicz;Yi Ping Shen

  • Rates, pathways and drivers for peatland development in the Hudson Bay Lowlands, northern Ontario, Canada

    Paul H. Glaser;Barbara C. S. Hansen;Donald I. Siegel;Donald I. Siegel;Andrew S. Reeve;Andrew S. Reeve

  • Raised bogs in eastern North America: transitions in landforms and gross stratigraphy

    Unknown

  • Origin of string patterns in boreal peatlands

    D. R. Foster;D. R. Foster;G. A. King;P. H. Glaser;H. E. Wright

  • Raised bogs in eastern North America - regional controls for species richness and floristic assemblages

    Paul H. Glaser

  • Investigating dissolved organic matter decomposition in northern peatlands using complimentary analytical techniques

    Malak M. Tfaily;Rasha Hamdan;Jane E. Corbett;Jeffrey P. Chanton

  • Denial of long-term issues with agriculture on tropical peatlands will have devastating consequences

    Lahiru S. Wijedasa;Jyrki Jauhiainen;Mari Könönen;Maija Lampela

  • Rates of peat accumulation during the postglacial period in 32 sites from Alaska to Newfoundland, with special emphasis on northern Minnesota

    Eville Gorham;Joannes A Janssens;Paul H Glaser

  • Temporal variations in dissolved methane deep in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands, Minnesota

    Edwin A. Romanowicz;Donald I. Siegel;Jeffrey P. Chanton;Paul H. Glaser

  • Use of hydraulic head to estimate volumetric gas content and ebullition flux in northern peatlands

    Donald O. Rosenberry;Paul H. Glaser;Donald I. Siegel;Edwin P. Weeks

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald I. Siegel
Donald I. Siegel Syracuse University
Jeffrey P. Chanton
Jeffrey P. Chanton Florida State University
Donald O. Rosenberry
Donald O. Rosenberry United States Geological Survey
David J. Burdige
David J. Burdige Old Dominion University
Malak M. Tfaily
Malak M. Tfaily University of Arizona
Hans Joosten
Hans Joosten University of Greifswald
Eville Gorham
Eville Gorham University of Minnesota
Steve Frolking
Steve Frolking University of New Hampshire
Lee Slater
Lee Slater Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career opportunities, but it's also valuable to explore related fields and flexible learning paths. For those interested in leadership roles within education or policy, finding accredited eds to edd programs can offer a direct route to advanced qualifications. These programs are designed for working professionals seeking to expand their impact in environmental education and research.

Alternatively, careers in social work intersect with environmental advocacy, where earning a Doctorate in Social Work (DSW) can be both impactful and accessible. Prospective students looking for affordable options should consider the dsw programs available online, which provide flexibility and focus on community well-being and sustainability.

For those starting out or shifting their focus, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap offers a broad educational foundation. This can complement specialized environmental coursework or serve as a stepping stone to more advanced degrees.

Lastly, if quick entry into the workforce is a priority, exploring the easiest degree to get options may help identify programs that balance manageability with meaningful outcomes. This strategy can help students transition smoothly into environmental careers with practical skills and credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Paul H. Glaser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles