World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 7084 6808 2529 2353 116 7396

Paul H. Glaser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul H. Glaser between 1979 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul H. Glaser published across 46 years, from 1979 to 2024, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2013. 3 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2013. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
1979 2024

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul H. Glaser: publications per year, 1979 to 2024
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 2
1982 0
1983 6
1984 2
1985 0
1986 4
1987 3
1988 0
1989 3
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 0
2000 5
2001 4
2002 0
2003 3
2004 4
2005 0
2006 7
2007 5
2008 6
2009 7
2010 3
2011 4
2012 4
2013 8
2014 4
2015 7
2016 3
2017 6
2018 4
2019 1
2020 0
2021 2
2022 0
2023 1
2024 2
Total 123
Download as CSV

Paul H. Glaser publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Glaser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 116 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 116
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul H. Glaser D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul H. Glaser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul H. Glaser is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental and earth sciences, with a significant emphasis on peatlands and wetlands ecology, as well as related subfields such as ecology, atmospheric science, and environmental engineering.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics including peatlands and wetlands ecology, coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics, geology and paleoclimatology research, groundwater flow and contamination studies, climate change and permafrost, and fire effects on ecosystems.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Paul H. Glaser cover various aspects of peatland hydrology and carbon dynamics. Some of these include:

  • A unified explanation for the morphology of raised peatlands, 2023, Nature
  • The hydraulic conductivity of peat with respect to scaling, botanical composition, and greenhouse gas transport: Mini-aquifer tests from the Red Lake Peatland, Minnesota, 2020, Journal of Hydrology
  • Tropical peatland carbon storage linked to global latitudinal trends in peat recalcitrance, 2020, MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
  • LARGE PEAT BASINS AS INCUBATORS OF METHANE AND CARBON DIOXIDE: A GEOCHEMICAL PERSPECTIVE, 2021, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Paul H. Glaser frequently publishes with multiple co-authors, indicating collaboration across various projects. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Ale×ander R. Cobb
  • René Dommain
  • Charles F. Harvey
  • A. S. Reeve
  • Jeffrey P. Chanton

The publication venues for Glaser's work span several reputable journals and society programs, illustrating active engagement with the scientific community. These venues include:

  • Nature
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

The main fields of study they contribute to are:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, subfield contributions are recorded as:

  • Ecology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Global and Planetary Change

Best Publications

  • Piston corers for peat and lake sediments

    H. E. Wright;D. H. Mann;P. H. Glaser

  • The patterned mires of the Red Lake Peatland, northern Minnesota: vegetation, water chemistry, and landforms

    Paul H. Glaser;Gerald A. Wheeler;Eville Gorham;Herbert E. Wright

  • THE RESPONSE OF VEGETATION TO CHEMICAL AND HYDROLOGICAL GRADIENTS IN THE LOST RIVER PEATLAND, NORTHERN MINNESOTA

    Paul H. Glaser;Jan A. Janssens;Donald I. Siegel

  • Radiocarbon and stable carbon isotopic evidence for transport and transformation of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved inorganic carbon, and CH4 in a northern Minnesota peatland

    L. S. Chasar;J. P. Chanton;Paul H Glaser;D. I. Siegel

  • Surface Deformations as Indicators of Deep Ebullition Fluxes in a Large Northern Peatland

    P. H. Glaser;J. P. Chanton;P. Morin;D. O. Rosenberry

  • Groundwater flow in a bog- fen complex, Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota.

    Unknown

  • Simulating vertical flow in large peatlands

    A.S Reeve;D.I Siegel;P.H Glaser

  • Tropical peatland carbon storage linked to global latitudinal trends in peat recalcitrance

    Suzanne B. Hodgkins;Curtis J. Richardson;René Dommain;Hongjun Wang

  • Radiocarbon Evidence for the Importance of Surface Vegetation on Fermentation and Methanogenesis in Contrasting Types of Boreal Peatlands

    J. P. Chanton;P. H. Glaser;L. S. Chasar;D. J. Burdige

  • Climate-driven flushing of pore water in peatlands

    D. I. Siegel;A. S. Reeve;Paul H Glaser;E. A. Romanowicz

  • Methane Concentration and Stable Isotope Distribution as Evidence of Rhizospheric Processes: Comparison of a Fen and Bog in the Glacial Lake Agassiz Peatland Complex

    L. S. Chasar;J. P. Chanton;Paul H Glaser;D. I. Siegel

  • Carbon storage and release in Indonesian peatlands since the last deglaciation

    René Dommain;John Couwenberg;Paul H. Glaser;Hans Joosten

  • Regional linkages between raised bogs and the climate, groundwater, and landscape of north-western Minnesota

    Paul H. Glaser;Donald I. Siegel;Edwin A. Romanowicz;Yi Ping Shen

  • Rates, pathways and drivers for peatland development in the Hudson Bay Lowlands, northern Ontario, Canada

    Paul H. Glaser;Barbara C. S. Hansen;Donald I. Siegel;Donald I. Siegel;Andrew S. Reeve;Andrew S. Reeve

  • Raised bogs in eastern North America: transitions in landforms and gross stratigraphy

    Unknown

  • Origin of string patterns in boreal peatlands

    D. R. Foster;D. R. Foster;G. A. King;P. H. Glaser;H. E. Wright

  • Raised bogs in eastern North America - regional controls for species richness and floristic assemblages

    Paul H. Glaser

  • Investigating dissolved organic matter decomposition in northern peatlands using complimentary analytical techniques

    Malak M. Tfaily;Rasha Hamdan;Jane E. Corbett;Jeffrey P. Chanton

  • Denial of long-term issues with agriculture on tropical peatlands will have devastating consequences

    Lahiru S. Wijedasa;Jyrki Jauhiainen;Mari Könönen;Maija Lampela

  • Rates of peat accumulation during the postglacial period in 32 sites from Alaska to Newfoundland, with special emphasis on northern Minnesota

    Eville Gorham;Joannes A Janssens;Paul H Glaser

  • Temporal variations in dissolved methane deep in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands, Minnesota

    Edwin A. Romanowicz;Donald I. Siegel;Jeffrey P. Chanton;Paul H. Glaser

  • Use of hydraulic head to estimate volumetric gas content and ebullition flux in northern peatlands

    Donald O. Rosenberry;Paul H. Glaser;Donald I. Siegel;Edwin P. Weeks

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald I. Siegel
Donald I. Siegel Syracuse University
Jeffrey P. Chanton
Jeffrey P. Chanton Florida State University
Donald O. Rosenberry
Donald O. Rosenberry United States Geological Survey
David J. Burdige
David J. Burdige Old Dominion University
Malak M. Tfaily
Malak M. Tfaily University of Arizona
Hans Joosten
Hans Joosten University of Greifswald
Eville Gorham
Eville Gorham University of Minnesota
Steve Frolking
Steve Frolking University of New Hampshire
Lee Slater
Lee Slater Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career opportunities, but it's also valuable to explore related fields and flexible learning paths. For those interested in leadership roles within education or policy, finding accredited eds to edd programs can offer a direct route to advanced qualifications. These programs are designed for working professionals seeking to expand their impact in environmental education and research.

Alternatively, careers in social work intersect with environmental advocacy, where earning a Doctorate in Social Work (DSW) can be both impactful and accessible. Prospective students looking for affordable options should consider the dsw programs available online, which provide flexibility and focus on community well-being and sustainability.

For those starting out or shifting their focus, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap offers a broad educational foundation. This can complement specialized environmental coursework or serve as a stepping stone to more advanced degrees.

Lastly, if quick entry into the workforce is a priority, exploring the easiest degree to get options may help identify programs that balance manageability with meaningful outcomes. This strategy can help students transition smoothly into environmental careers with practical skills and credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Paul H. Glaser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles