World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
31520
World Ranking
2115
National Ranking
1231

John R. Hollenbeck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Hollenbeck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 165 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John R. Hollenbeck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Hollenbeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

John R. Hollenbeck is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting with a focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, and Management Science and Operations Research. The research interests also include Gender Studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of organizational and psychological domains such as Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Team Dynamics and Performance, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Management and Organizational Studies, Gender Diversity and Inequality, Mental Health Research Topics, and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by John R. Hollenbeck include:

  • Latent Change Score Models for the Study of Development and Dynamics in Organizational Research, 2020, Organizational Research Methods
  • A Tale of Two Hierarchies: Interactive Effects of Power Differentiation and Status Differentiation on Team Performance, 2021, Organization Science
  • Self-oriented competitiveness in salespeople: sales management implications, 2021, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • When discretionary boundary spanning relationships cease becoming discretionary: The impact of closed ties on informal leadership perceptions, 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • The Highs and Lows of Hierarchy in Multiteam Systems, 2021, Academy of Management Journal

Frequent co-authors working alongside John R. Hollenbeck include James Garrett Matusik, Rebecca L. Mitchell, Daniel J. Griffin, Nicholas A. Hays, and Ryan Scott Hemsley. This collaboration indicates a consistent research network.

The venues that frequently publish John R. Hollenbeck's work reflect an engagement with key outlets in management and psychology. These include the Academy of Management Proceedings, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Research Methods, Organization Science, and the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

The scientist has received notable recognition such as being named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2007 and a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 1996. Additionally, John R. Hollenbeck holds the status of Dean of Fellows from the Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models

    Daniel R. Ilgen;John R. Hollenbeck;Michael Johnson;Dustin Jundt

  • Fundamentals of Human Resource Management

    Raymond A. Noe;John R. Hollenbeck;Barry Gerhart;Patrick M. Wright.

  • RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS

    Frederick P. Morgeson;Michael A. Campion;Robert L. Dipboye;John R. Hollenbeck

  • Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research.

    John R. Hollenbeck;Howard J. Klein

  • Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis.

    Howard J. Klein;Michael J. Wesson;John R. Hollenbeck;Bradley J. Alge

  • The structure of work: Job design and roles.

    Daniel R. Ilgen;John R. Hollenbeck

  • An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals.

    John R. Hollenbeck;Charles R. Williams;Howard J. Klein

  • Organizational behavior : securing competitive advantage

    John A. Wagner;John R. Hollenbeck

  • Developing Leaders via Experience: The Role of Developmental Challenge, Learning Orientation, and Feedback Availability

    D. Scott DeRue;Ned Wellman

  • Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency Approach

    Bianca Beersma;John R. Hollenbeck;Stephen E. Humphrey;Henry Moon

  • Facing Differences With an Open Mind: Openness to Experience, Salience of Intragroup Differences, and Performance of Diverse Work Groups

    Astrid C. Homan;John R. Hollenbeck;Stephen E. Humphrey;Daan Van Knippenberg

  • Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: Empirical evidence and related matters.

    Eugene F. Stone;John R. Hollenbeck

  • Team learning: collectively connecting the dots.

    Aleksander P. J. Ellis;John R. Hollenbeck;Daniel R. Ilgen;Christopher O. L. H. Porter

  • A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

    John E Mathieu;John R Hollenbeck;Daniel L Van Knippenberg;Daniel Ilgen

  • Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team Description

    John R. Hollenbeck;Bianca Beersma;Maartje E. Schouten

  • Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise.

    John R. Hollenbeck;Daniel R. Ilgen;Douglas J. Sego;Jennifer Hedlund

  • The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis.

    Howard J. Klein;Michael J. Wesson;John R. Hollenbeck;Patrick M. Wright

  • Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g

    Jeffrey A. LePine;John R. Hollenbeck;Daniel R. Ilgen;Jennifer Hedlund

  • Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment

    John R. Hollenbeck;Howard J. Klein;Anne M. O'Leary;Patrick M. Wright

  • Backing Up Behaviors in Teams: The Role of Personality and Legitimacy of Need

    Christopher Olden Lee Howard Porter;John R. Hollenbeck;Daniel R. Ilgen;Aleksander P.J. Ellis

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel R. Ilgen
Daniel R. Ilgen Michigan State University
Stephen E. Humphrey
Stephen E. Humphrey Pennsylvania State University
D. Scott DeRue
D. Scott DeRue University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Aleksander P. J. Ellis
Aleksander P. J. Ellis University of Arizona
Christopher M. Barnes
Christopher M. Barnes University of Washington
Raymond A. Noe
Raymond A. Noe The Ohio State University
Howard J. Klein
Howard J. Klein The Ohio State University
Barry Gerhart
Barry Gerhart University of Wisconsin–Madison
Donald E. Conlon
Donald E. Conlon Michigan State University
Jason A. Colquitt
Jason A. Colquitt University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens up a range of online degrees and specialized career paths, especially in fields like substance abuse counseling. Many who study psychology in the USA choose this rewarding profession, as demand continues to grow nationwide.

To get started, it’s essential to understand the specific education and certification requirements which can differ by state and city. For instance, if you’re interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Port St. Lucie, you’ll find a thorough process involving state-approved coursework, practical experience, and licensure exams.

Other cities have their own standards. Portland substance abuse counselors education requirements generally include a relevant degree and supervised clinical hours, while Raleigh substance abuse counselors education requirements focus on both education and ongoing professional development.

Understanding Reno substance abuse counselor certification requirements is equally important for those planning to work in Nevada. Exploring these pathways can help psychology students identify the best route for launching a meaningful career in mental health and addiction services.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Hollenbeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles