World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Aleksander P. J. Ellis

Aleksander P. J. Ellis

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
7006
World Ranking
11076
National Ranking
5786

Aleksander P. J. Ellis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aleksander P. J. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Aleksander P. J. Ellis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aleksander P. J. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aleksander P. J. Ellis is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences, with a strong focus on organizational behavior and social psychology. Ellis's work contributes to understanding dynamics in workplace environments, ethics, and intergroup relations.

The main fields of study for Ellis include:

  • Social Sciences

Subfields of study in which Ellis has published include:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Information Systems and Management

Key topics covered in Ellis's research are:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Team Dynamics and Performance

Ellis has contributed to a range of publication venues, notably:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Journal of Business Ethics
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior

Among recent papers associated with Ellis's research activity are:

  • "Race and reactions to women's expressions of anger at work: Examining the effects of the 'angry Black woman' stereotype." (2021, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • "Incivility and creativity in teams: Examining the role of perpetrator gender." (2020, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • "If You Can't Join 'Em, Report 'Em: A Model of Ostracism and Whistleblowing in Teams." (2020, Journal of Business Ethics)
  • "The impact of supervisor-employee self-protective implicit voice theory alignment." (2021, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology)
  • "Examining the Hindering Effects of Receiving Help on Internal Reporting of Unethical Behavior." (2025, Journal of Organizational Behavior)

Frequent co-authors in Ellis's work include:

  • Daphna Motro
  • Ke Michael
  • Benjamin G. Perkins
  • Feng Qiu
  • Trevor Spoelma

Ellis's research intersects various domains within social sciences, with particular emphasis on ethical behavior at work, team dynamics, and the psychological underpinnings of organizational processes. The collaboration with multiple co-authors and publications in diverse journals reflects a multidisciplinary approach addressing complex social and organizational questions.

Best Publications

  • Examining the Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Workplace Deviance: A Self-Regulatory Perspective

    Michael S. Christian;Aleksander P. J. Ellis

  • Team learning: collectively connecting the dots.

    Aleksander P. J. Ellis;John R. Hollenbeck;Daniel R. Ilgen;Christopher O. L. H. Porter

  • The Use of Impression Management Tactics in Structured Interviews: A Function of Question Type?

    Aleksander P. J. Ellis;Bradley J. West;Ann Marie Ryan;Richard P. DeShon

  • System Breakdown: The Role of Mental Models and Transactive Memory in the Relationship between Acute Stress and Team Performance

    Aleksander P. J. Ellis

  • Backing Up Behaviors in Teams: The Role of Personality and Legitimacy of Need

    Christopher Olden Lee Howard Porter;John R. Hollenbeck;Daniel R. Ilgen;Aleksander P.J. Ellis

  • Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-team fit.

    John R. Hollenbeck;Henry Moon;Aleksander P. J. Ellis;Bradley J. West

  • Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: is activation the key?

    Matthew J. Pearsall;Aleksander P. J. Ellis;Joel M. Evans

  • Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes

    Matthew J. Pearsall;Aleksander P.J. Ellis;Jordan H. Stein

  • An Evaluation of Generic Teamwork Skills Training with Action Teams: Effects on Cognitive and Skill-Based Outcomes

    Aleksander P.J. Ellis;Bradford S. Bell;Robert E. Ployhart;John R. Hollenbeck

  • The Crucial Role of Turnover Intentions in Transforming Moral Disengagement Into Deviant Behavior at Work

    Jessica Siegel Christian;Aleksander P. J. Ellis

  • Thick as thieves: the effects of ethical orientation and psychological safety on unethical team behavior.

    Matthew J. Pearsall;Aleksander P. J. Ellis

  • Motivating interdependent teams: individual rewards, shared rewards, or something in between?

    Matthew J. Pearsall;Michael S. Christian;Aleksander P. J. Ellis

  • The Effects of Critical Team Member Assertiveness on Team Performance and Satisfaction

    Matthew J. Pearsall;Aleksander P. J. Ellis

  • ASYMMETRIC ADAPTABILITY: DYNAMIC TEAM STRUCTURES AS ONE-WAY STREETS

    Henry Moon;John R. Hollenbeck;John R. Hollenbeck;Stephen E. Humphrey;Daniel R. Ilgen;Daniel R. Ilgen

  • Examining the effects of turnover intentions on organizational citizenship behaviors and deviance behaviors: A psychological contract approach.

    Ke Michael Mai;Aleksander P. J. Ellis;Jessica Siegel Christian;Christopher O. L. H. Porter

  • Building the Infrastructure: The Effects of Role Identification Behaviors on Team Cognition Development and Performance

    Matthew J. Pearsall;Aleksander P. J. Ellis;Bradford S. Bell

  • Asymmetry in structural adaptation: The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision-making structures

    John R. Hollenbeck;Aleksander P.J. Ellis;Stephen E. Humphrey;Adela S. Garza

  • Building a self-regulatory model of sleep deprivation and deception: The role of caffeine and social influence

    David T. Welsh;Aleksander P. J. Ellis;Michael S. Christian;Ke Michael Mai

  • Gender composition, situational strength, and team decision-making accuracy: A criterion decomposition approach

    Jeffrey A. LePine;John R. Hollenbeck;Daniel R. Ilgen;Jason A. Colquitt

  • Item Placement on a Personality Measure: Effects on Faking Behavior and Test Measurement Properties

    Lynn A. McFarland;Ann Marie Ryan;Aleksander Ellis

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel R. Ilgen
Daniel R. Ilgen Michigan State University
John R. Hollenbeck
John R. Hollenbeck Michigan State University
Stephen E. Humphrey
Stephen E. Humphrey Pennsylvania State University
Donald E. Conlon
Donald E. Conlon Michigan State University
Robert E. Ployhart
Robert E. Ployhart University of South Carolina
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Allison S. Gabriel
Allison S. Gabriel Purdue University West Lafayette
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Maureen L. Ambrose
Maureen L. Ambrose University of Central Florida
Jason A. Colquitt
Jason A. Colquitt University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a variety of related fields and career pathways, particularly in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students interested in human behavior and helping professions find that social work programs provide rewarding career opportunities and a practical application for psychological theories.

Those looking for flexible learning options should explore accredited online degrees, which allow students to balance their studies with work or personal commitments. For instance, the best social work degrees in Oklahoma and best social work degrees in Portland offer a comprehensive understanding of both psychology and social work principles for diverse populations.

Top-rated programs can also be found in various regions across the U.S., such as the top social work programs in Philadelphia and best social work programs in Salt Lake City. Graduates from these programs are prepared for dynamic roles in public agencies, healthcare, schools, or private practices. As the demand for mental health professionals continues to grow, these academic pathways offer practical skills and diverse career prospects for those passionate about making a difference.

Best Scientists Citing Aleksander P. J. Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles