World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
16520
World Ranking
2083
National Ranking
853

E. G. Shelley publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. G. Shelley sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 161 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

E. G. Shelley D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. G. Shelley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

E. G. Shelley is affiliated with Lockheed Martin in the United States and focuses their research efforts primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work extends into subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's research topics prominently focus on Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosols, and Wind and Air Flow Studies. This specialization reflects an interest in understanding the dynamics and chemical processes of atmospheric gases, as well as their interactions with environmental factors.

Shelley has contributed to the scientific community through publications in venues such as the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Among the recent published works is the paper titled Continuous Lidar Measurements of Methane Emissions from Flowback: Differences Between Actual and Reported Emissions, published in 2025 at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Shelley's research profile, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Manasi Doshi
  • Andrew E. Pomerantz
  • Stephen A. Dyer
  • Florian Hollaender
  • L. M. Kotlyar

Their research output reflects a consistent engagement with interdisciplinary topics relevant to both environmental and atmospheric sciences. This aligns with their involvement in Environmental Engineering and studies of global and planetary changes, emphasizing the interaction between atmospheric phenomena and environmental systems.

No awards have been recorded for Shelley, and there are no book publications listed as part of their academic contributions.

Best Publications

  • First multispacecraft ion measurements in and near the Earth's magnetosphere with the identical Cluster ion spectrometry (CIS) experiment

    H. Rème;C. Aoustin;J. M. Bosqued;I. Dandouras

  • SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS OF ENERGETIC HEAVY IONS DURING A GEOMAGNETIC STORM.

    E. G. Shelley;R. G. Johnson;R. D. Sharp

  • Satellite observations of an ionospheric acceleration mechanism

    E. G. Shelley;R. D. Sharp;R. G. Johnson

  • FAST satellite observations of large‐amplitude solitary structures

    R. E. Ergun;C. W. Carlson;J. P. McFadden;F. S. Mozer

  • Observation of an ionospheric acceleration mechanism producing energetic (keV) ions primarily normal to the geomagnetic field direction

    R. D. Sharp;R. G. Johnson;E. G. Shelley

  • Ion composition and dynamics at comet Halley

    H. Balsiger;K. Altwegg;F. Bühler;J. Geiss

  • The latitudinal, diurnal, and altitudinal distributions of upward flowing energetic ions of ionospheric origin

    A. G. Ghielmetti;R. G. Johnson;R. D. Sharp;E. G. Shelley

  • Rosina - Rosetta orbiter spectrometer for ion and neutral analysis

    Hans Balsiger;Kathrin Altwegg;Peter Bochsler;Peter Eberhardt

  • The Cluster Ion Spectrometry (CIS) Experiment

    H. Rème;J. M. Bosqued;J. A. Sauvaud;A. Cros

  • The theta aurora

    L. A. Frank;J. D. Craven;D. A. Gurnett;S. D. Shawhan

  • FAST observations in the downward auroral current region: Energetic upgoing electron beams, parallel potential drops, and ion heating

    C. W. Carlson;J. P. McFadden;R. E. Ergun;M. Temerin

  • FAST satellite observations of electric field structures in the auroral zone

    R. E. Ergun;C. W. Carlson;J. P. McFadden;F. S. Mozer

  • Energetic Auroral and Polar Ion Outflow at DE 1 Altitudes' Magnitude, Composition, Magnetic Activity Dependence, and Long-Term Variations

    A. W. Yau;E. G. Shelley;W. K. Peterson;L. Lenchyshyn

  • Survey of 0.1- to 16-keV/e plasma sheet ion composition

    Unknown

  • IMF By ‐dependent plasma flow and Birkeland currents in the dayside magnetosphere: 1. Dynamics Explorer observations

    J. L. Burch;P. H. Reiff;J. D. Menietti;R. A. Heelis

  • Magnetic storm of September 4, 1984 - a synthesis of ring current spectra and energy densities measured with AMPTE/CCE

    S. M. Krimigis;G. Gloeckler;R. W. McEntire;T. A. Potemra

  • FAST satellite wave observations in the AKR source region

    R. E. Ergun;C. W. Carlson;J. P. McFadden;F. S. Mozer

  • Determination of auroral electrostatic potentials using high- and low-altitude particle distributions

    P. H. Reiff;H. L. Collin;J. D. Craven;J. L. Burch

  • He++ and H+ flux measurements in the day side cusp: Estimates of convection electric field

    E. G. Shelley;R. D. Sharp;R. G. Johnson

  • Ion streams in the magnetotail

    R. D. Sharp;D. L. Carr;W. K. Peterson;E. G. Shelley

  • Ion Reflection and transmission during reconnection at the Earth's subsolar magnetopause

    S. A. Fuselier;D. M. Klumpar;E. G. Shelley

  • Some general characteristics of upflowing ion beams over the auroral zone and their relationship to auroral electrons

    H. L. Collin;R. D. Sharp;E. G. Shelley;R. G. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

W. K. Peterson
W. K. Peterson University of Colorado Boulder
L. M. Kistler
L. M. Kistler University of New Hampshire
C. W. Carlson
C. W. Carlson University of California, Berkeley
Robert E. Ergun
Robert E. Ergun University of Colorado Boulder
F. S. Mozer
F. S. Mozer University of California, Berkeley
J. P. McFadden
J. P. McFadden University of California, Berkeley
James L. Burch
James L. Burch Southwest Research Institute
Peter Wurz
Peter Wurz University of Bern
D. A. Gurnett
D. A. Gurnett University of Iowa
G. Paschmann
G. Paschmann Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences often means exploring diverse educational options that can complement your focus on sustainability, policy, or research. For individuals looking to advance their credentials in education and environmental leadership, an online eds to edd bridge program offers a convenient path to gaining expertise while balancing professional commitments.

If social work intersects with environmental advocacy in your career aspirations, seeking affordable advanced social work degrees is essential. The cheapest online dsw programs can provide specialized knowledge for those aiming to address social issues linked to environmental challenges.

For students wanting a broad and flexible foundation, pursuing a low cost online general studies degree offers a budget-friendly approach while still allowing the inclusion of environmental topics alongside other disciplines.

Lastly, if you are just starting out or considering a change in direction, exploring easy bachelor degrees might help you identify programs that match your learning style and lead to a meaningful career in environmental science or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing E. G. Shelley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles