World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5727 5319 2709 2470 173 5463

Jon S. Bailey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jon S. Bailey between 1952 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jon S. Bailey published across 72 years, from 1952 to 2023, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 3 of the 200 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1952 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 4 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 7 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 26 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication
1952 2023

200 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jon S. Bailey: publications per year, 1952 to 2023
Year Publications
1952 1
1953 0
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 3
1977 3
1978 2
1979 1
1980 4
1981 3
1982 3
1983 3
1984 2
1985 4
1986 1
1987 3
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 7
1997 2
1998 3
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 13
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 14
2007 1
2008 2
2009 2
2010 14
2011 2
2012 1
2013 7
2014 1
2015 1
2016 16
2017 14
2018 1
2019 26
2020 7
2021 5
2022 2
2023 1
Total 200
Download as CSV

Jon S. Bailey publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon S. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 173
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jon S. Bailey D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon S. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jon S. Bailey is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States and has contributed to the fields of veterinary science and medicine, with a particular focus on equine studies. Their research encompasses various aspects of veterinary equine medical research, surgery, and small animals, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach within veterinary medicine.

The scientist's publications have appeared in several peer-reviewed venues, including:

  • Veterinary Medicine and Science
  • Equine Veterinary Education
  • Equine Veterinary Journal

Jon S. Bailey's recent research output includes studies on equine health and veterinary diagnostics. Notable papers include:

  • "Does lesion type or severity predict outcome of therapy for horses with equine glandular gastric disease? - A retrospective study," 2022, Veterinary Medicine and Science
  • "Unilateral degenerative joint disease of a cervical articular process joint between the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae causing asymmetrical ataxia in a young horse," 2021, Equine Veterinary Education
  • "An objective study into the effects of an incline on naturally occurring lameness in horses," 2022, Veterinary Medicine and Science
  • "Diagnostic accuracy of plain radiography to identify synovial penetration in horses with traumatic limb wounds," 2022, Equine Veterinary Journal

They often collaborate with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mark Bowen
  • Gayle Hallowell
  • Adam Redpath
  • B. Anghileri
  • Stefanie Pratt

Jon S. Bailey's work broadly covers the following research topics:

  • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Veterinary Medicine and Infectious Diseases
  • Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
  • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
  • Entomological Studies and Ecology
  • Veterinary Practice and Education Studies

Their studies focus on areas such as equine surgery, endocrinology, and veterinary ecology while integrating aspects of diagnosis and treatment of orthopedic and neurological conditions in animals. This specialization aligns with their main fields of veterinary science and medicine overall.

Best Publications

  • Research Methods in Applied Behavior Analysis

    Jon S. Bailey;Mary R. Burch

  • RITALIN VS. RESPONSE COST IN THE CONTROL OF HYPERACTIVE CHILDREN: A WITHIN‐SUBJECT COMPARISON

    M D Rapport;H A Murphy;J S Bailey

  • A review of empirical support for differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

    Erin S. Petscher;Catalina Rey;Jon S. Bailey

  • Using Feedback and Reinforcement to Improve the Performance and Safety of a Roofing Crew

    John Austin;Maria Lynn Kessler;John E. Riccobono;Jon S. Bailey

  • Home-based reinforcement and the modification of pre-delinquents' classroom behavior.

    Jon S. Bailey;Montrose M. Wolf;Elery L. Phillips

  • An assessment of social validity trends in applied behavior analysis

    James E. Carr;James E. Carr;Jennifer L. Austin;Lisa N. Britton;Karen Kate Kellum

  • THE EFFECTS OF SELF‐MONITORING AND SUPERVISOR FEEDBACK ON STAFF PERFORMANCE IN A RESIDENTIAL SETTING

    Gina S. Richman;Mary R. Riordan;Maxin L. Reiss;David A. M. Pyles

  • Teaching pedestrian safety skills to young children: an analysis and one-year followup.

    William H. Yeaton;Jon S. Bailey

  • Measuring client gains from staff-implemented programs.

    Brandon F. Greene;B. S. Willis;Rick Levy;Jon S. Bailey

  • Teaching intraverbal behavior to preschool children.

    James W. Partington;Jon S. Bailey

  • Effects of Guided Notes on University Students' Responding and Recall of Information

    Jennifer L. Austin;Melissa Gilbert Lee;Matthew Doran Thibeault;James E. Carr

  • Reward versus cost token systems: an analysis of the effects on students and teacher

    Brian A. Iwata;Jon S. Bailey

  • A performance-based lottery to improve residential care and training by institutional staff.

    Unknown

  • Marketing behavior analysis requires different talk.

    Jon S. Bailey

  • Behavioral community psychology: encouraging low-income parents to seek dental care for their children.

    Maxine L. Reiss;William D. Piotrowski;Jon S. Bailey

  • On the effects of noncontingent delivery of differing magnitudes of reinforcement.

    James E. Carr;Jon S. Bailey;Cheryl L. Ecott;Kim D. Lucker

  • Current limits to reinforcer identification for some persons with profound multiple disabilities.

    Martin T. Ivancic;Jon S. Bailey

  • BEHAVIORAL COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY: TRAINING A COMMUNITY BOARD TO PROBLEM SOLVE1

    Richard V. Briscoe;David B. Hoffman;Jon S. Bailey

  • Behavioral school psychology goes outdoors: the effect of organized games on playground aggression.

    H A Murphy;J M Hutchison;J S Bailey

  • Cross-age tutoring: fifth graders as arithmetic tutors for kindergarten children.

    Martha Johnson;Jon S. Bailey

  • The effects of a response cost treatment tactic on hyperactive children

    Mark D. Rapport;Al Murphy;Jon S. Bailey

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Carr
James E. Carr Behavior Analyst Certification Board
Bruce A. Thyer
Bruce A. Thyer Florida State University
Mark D. Rapport
Mark D. Rapport University of Central Florida
Tristram Smith
Tristram Smith University of Rochester Medical Center
Timothy R. Vollmer
Timothy R. Vollmer University of Florida
Jesse Dallery
Jesse Dallery University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA offers a variety of flexible online degree options that lead to rewarding careers. For those interested in psychology, there are most affordable online psychology degree programs that help students reduce costs without sacrificing quality. These programs are popular among students seeking entry-level roles in counseling, education, or community services.

Aspiring social workers can consider msw schools available online, some of which have more accessible admission requirements. These programs typically prepare graduates for advanced roles in mental health, family services, and public welfare.

Professionals aiming for clinical practice or higher credentials can fast-track their education with accelerated psyd programs, enabling quicker eligibility for psychology licensure. Meanwhile, individuals interested in family or couples counseling will benefit from mft accredited programs, some of which offer shorter completion times while maintaining rigorous standards.

Exploring these online degrees can open doors to diverse career pathways—from therapy and mental health advocacy to leadership roles in community organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Jon S. Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles