World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9330 8721 4935 4496 65 10597

Richard P. DeShon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard P. DeShon between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard P. DeShon published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1998. 1 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1998. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1991 2025

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard P. DeShon: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 3
1995 2
1996 3
1997 3
1998 7
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 5
2005 2
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 3
2010 2
2011 1
2012 7
2013 5
2014 1
2015 2
2016 0
2017 1
2018 3
2019 0
2020 4
2021 3
2022 4
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 80
Download as CSV

Richard P. DeShon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. DeShon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 65
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard P. DeShon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. DeShon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard P. DeShon is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans diverse areas within psychology and social sciences, focusing on understanding the dynamics of teams, social networks, and decision-making processes.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these domains, DeShon's work extends into several subfields such as:

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Communication
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Their research topics cover areas like:

  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Representations and Identity
  • Resilience and Mental Health

DeShon has contributed to articles in several academic journals, including the following publication venues:

  • Small Group Research
  • Organizational Research Methods
  • Psychological Methods
  • Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by DeShon are:

  • Exploring the Dynamic Team Cohesion-Performance and Coordination-Performance Relationships of Newly Formed Teams, 2020, Small Group Research
  • A tutorial on Bollen and Brand's approach to modeling dynamics while attending to dynamic panel bias, 2021, Psychological Methods
  • Evaluating Interdependence in Workgroups: A Network-Based Method, 2022, Organizational Research Methods
  • What is the critical mass of help? A potential resolution to a paradox on citizenship and organizational performance, 2020, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Christopher Dishop
  • Michael T. Braun
  • Steve W. J. Kozlowski
  • Tara A. Brown
  • Daniel J. Griffin

Best Publications

  • Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys

    Jason L. Huang;Paul G. Curran;Jessica Keeney;Elizabeth M. Poposki

  • A Motivated Action Theory Account of Goal Orientation.

    Richard P. DeShon;Jennifer Z. Gillespie

  • Climate perceptions matter: a meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes.

    Jennifer Z. Carr;Aaron M. Schmidt;J. Kevin Ford;Richard P. DeShon

  • A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance.

    Richard P. DeShon;Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Aaron M. Schmidt;Karen R. Milner

  • The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis.

    Howard J. Klein;Michael J. Wesson;John R. Hollenbeck;Patrick M. Wright

  • The Use of Impression Management Tactics in Structured Interviews: A Function of Question Type?

    Aleksander P. J. Ellis;Bradley J. West;Ann Marie Ryan;Richard P. DeShon

  • Reactions to cognitive ability tests: the relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation.

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt;Richard P. DeShon;Cathy S. Clause

  • What to do? The effects of discrepancies, incentives, and time on dynamic goal prioritization.

    Aaron M. Schmidt;Richard P. DeShon

  • A Cautionary Note on Measurement Error Corrections in Structural Equation Models

    Richard P. DeShon

  • The Moderating Effects of Performance Ambiguity on the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Performance

    Aaron M. Schmidt;Richard P. DeShon

  • INTERRATER CORRELATIONS DO NOT ESTIMATE THE RELIABILITY OF JOB PERFORMANCE RATINGS

    Kevin R. Murphy;Richard Deshon

  • Understanding pretest and posttest reactions to cognitive ability and personality tests

    David Chan;Neal Schmitt;Joshua M. Sacco;Richard P. DeShon

  • A tale of two tasks: reversing the self-regulatory resource depletion effect.

    Patrick D. Converse;Richard P. DeShon

  • Mediational Inferences in Organizational Research Then, Now, and Beyond

    John E. Mathieu;Richard P. DeShon;Donald D. Bergh

  • Verbal overshadowing effects on Raven's advanced progressive matrices: Evidence for multidimensional performance determinants

    Richard P. DeShon;David Chan;Daniel A. Weissbein

  • A Psychological Fidelity Approach to Simulation-Based Training: Theory, Research, and Principles

    Steve W. J. Kozlowski;Richard P. DeShon

  • A Process Model of Goal Orientation and Feedback Seeking

    Guihyun Grace Park;Aaron M. Schmidt;Christine Scheu;Richard P. Deshon

  • Twilight of dawn or of evening? A century of research methods in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

    Jose M. Cortina;Herman Aguinis;Richard P. DeShon

  • The motivating potential of teams: Test and extension of Chen and Kanfer's (2006) cross-level model of motivation in teams

    Gilad Chen;Ruth Kanfer;Richard P. DeShon;John E. Mathieu

  • Does self-regulation require cognitive resources? Evaluation of resource allocation models of goal setting.

    Richard P. DeShon;Kenneth G. Brown;Jennifer L. Greenis

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve W. J. Kozlowski
Steve W. J. Kozlowski University of South Florida
David Chan
David Chan Singapore Management University
Neal Schmitt
Neal Schmitt Michigan State University
Alexander von Eye
Alexander von Eye Michigan State University
John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut
Jose M. Cortina
Jose M. Cortina Virginia Commonwealth University
Thomas H. Carr
Thomas H. Carr Michigan State University
Howard J. Klein
Howard J. Klein The Ohio State University
J. Kevin Ford
J. Kevin Ford Michigan State University
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to several rewarding career paths, particularly in counseling and therapy. Many students choose to become a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a profession that addresses critical relational and mental health needs in communities.

There are distinct state and city-specific requirements for becoming an MFT. For example, mft requirements in Aurora include earning a relevant graduate degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing licensure exams. Similarly, learning how to become an mft in Austin will highlight differences in supervision rules and additional professional development.

Besides coursework and practicum, prospective therapists must also navigate local regulations. For those curious about Bakersfield mft certification requirements or how to become a marriage and family therapist in Baltimore, the pathways involve unique state board certifications and training standards.

Whether you plan to study entirely online or through a blended format, understanding local requirements is critical for a smooth transition from education to practice as a licensed therapist in your chosen city or state.

Best Scientists Citing Richard P. DeShon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles