World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
10781
World Ranking
5885
National Ranking
603

Amy Slater publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Slater sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Amy Slater D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy Slater sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amy Slater is affiliated with the University of the West of England in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several fields and subfields of social sciences and psychology, with a strong focus on areas such as clinical psychology, sociology and political science, literature and literary theory, education, and gender studies.

The primary topics covered in their work include eating disorders and behaviors, the impact of technology on adolescents, media influence and health, child development and digital technology, obesity and health practices, body image and dysmorphia studies, and physical activity and diet related to obesity.

They have contributed substantially to academic literature with notable recent papers including:

  • A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys, 2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • The case for body positivity on social media: Perspectives on current advances and future directions, 2020, Journal of Health Psychology
  • Social media, body satisfaction and well-being among adolescents: A mediation model of appearance-ideal internalization and comparison, 2020, Body Image
  • Body dissatisfaction predicts the onset of depression among adolescent females and males: a prospective study, 2020, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
  • Motivations for Social Media Use: Associations with Social Media Engagement and Body Satisfaction and Well-Being among Adolescents, 2021, Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Frequent publication venues for Amy Slater include:

  • Body Image
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Health Psychology
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

In collaboration, they commonly work with a group of co-authors including Hannah K. Jarman, Siân A. McLean, Susan J. Paxton, Rachel F. Rodgers, and Chloe S. Gordon, with multiple joint publications reflecting an ongoing research partnership.

Best Publications

  • NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls

    Marika Tiggemann;Amy Elise Slater

  • Gender differences in adolescent sport participation, teasing, self-objectification and body image concerns

    Amy Slater;Marika Tiggemann

  • Thin ideals in music television: a source of social comparison and body dissatisfaction.

    Marika Tiggemann;Amy Slater

  • The relationship between Facebook and Instagram appearance-focused activities and body image concerns in young women

    Rachel Cohen;Toby Newton-John;Amy Slater

  • A Test of Objectification Theory in Former Dancers and Non-Dancers

    Marika Tiggemann;Amy Slater

  • #BoPo on Instagram: An experimental investigation of the effects of viewing body positive content on young women’s mood and body image:

    Rachel Cohen;Jasmine Fardouly;Toby Newton-John;Amy Slater

  • A test of Objectification Theory in adolescent girls

    Amy Slater;Marika Tiggemann

  • "Uncool to do sport": a focus group study of adolescent girls' reasons for withdrawing from physical activity.

    Amy Slater;Marika Tiggemann

  • Interventions that involve parents to improve children's weight-related nutrition intake and activity patterns - what nutrition and activity targets and behaviour change techniques are associated with intervention effectiveness?

    Rebecca Golley;Gillian Hendrie;Amy Slater;Nadia Corsini

  • #bodypositivity: A content analysis of body positive accounts on Instagram

    Rachel Cohen;Lauren Irwin;Toby Newton-John;Amy Slater

  • NetTweens The Internet and Body Image Concerns in Preteenage Girls

    Marika Tiggemann;Amy Elise Slater

  • Selfie-objectification

    Rachel Cohen;Toby Newton-John;Amy Slater

  • #fitspo or #loveyourself? The impact of fitspiration and self-compassion Instagram images on women's body image, self-compassion, and mood.

    Amy Slater;Neesha Varsani;Phillippa C. Diedrichs

  • "I would rather be size 10 than have straight A's": a focus group study of adolescent girls' wish to be thinner.

    Marika Tiggemann;Maria Gardiner;A. M. Y. Slater

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Plus Bright Light Therapy for Adolescent Delayed Sleep Phase Disorder

    Michael Gradisar;Hayley Dohnt;Gregory Gardner;Sarah Paine

  • Body image and disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys: A test of objectification theory

    Amy Elise Slater;Marika Tiggemann

  • A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Amy Slater;Chloe S. Gordon;Siân A. McLean

  • The case for body positivity on social media: Perspectives on current advances and future directions

    Rachel Cohen;Toby Newton-John;Amy Slater

  • Social media, body satisfaction and well-being among adolescents: A mediation model of appearance-ideal internalization and comparison.

    Hannah K. Jarman;Mathew D. Marques;Siân A. McLean;Amy Slater

  • Disclaimer labels on fashion magazine advertisements: effects on social comparison and body dissatisfaction.

    Marika Tiggemann;Amy Slater;Belinda Bury;Kimberley Hawkins

  • Reality check: An experimental investigation of the addition of warning labels to fashion magazine images on women's mood and body dissatisfaction

    Amy Slater;Marika Tiggemann;Bonny Firth;Kimberley Hawkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Marika Tiggemann
Marika Tiggemann Flinders University
Rachel F. Rodgers
Rachel F. Rodgers Northeastern University
Carlene Wilson
Carlene Wilson Flinders University
Susan J. Paxton
Susan J. Paxton La Trobe University
Siân A. McLean
Siân A. McLean La Trobe University
Emma Halliwell
Emma Halliwell University of the West of England
Michael Gradisar
Michael Gradisar Flinders University
Tracy L. Tylka
Tracy L. Tylka The Ohio State University
Phillippa C. Diedrichs
Phillippa C. Diedrichs University of the West of England
Jasmine Fardouly
Jasmine Fardouly University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a broad range of online programs and career opportunities across various specializations. Students interested in the business side of psychology can explore colleges with industrial organizational psychology majors, focusing on improving workplace productivity and employee well-being.

For those drawn to the intersection of psychology and the legal system, earning a forensic psychology masters USA degree can lead to roles in law enforcement agencies or court systems. These specialized programs equip graduates with insights into criminal behavior and legal processes.

Many working professionals choose flexible options, such as an organizational psychology masters online, to enhance their leadership or consultancy careers. Meanwhile, undergraduate learners can search for the best online psychology colleges to get a solid foundation for a variety of roles within mental health, education, and more.

Whether you aim for graduate-level specialization or a broad-based online psychology degree, accredited U.S. programs offer pathways tailored to your interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Amy Slater

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles