World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jasmine Fardouly

Jasmine Fardouly

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 33 909 906 50 50 72 7375
Psychology 38 8735 8157 515 504 71 9623

Jasmine Fardouly publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jasmine Fardouly between 2012 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jasmine Fardouly published across 14 years, from 2012 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2022. 14 of the 83 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2012 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2022. 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 4 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 9 publications
2012 2025

83 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jasmine Fardouly: publications per year, 2012 to 2025
Year Publications
2012 1
2013 1
2014 1
2015 4
2016 1
2017 1
2018 4
2019 10
2020 8
2021 12
2022 13
2023 13
2024 5
2025 9
Total 83
Download as CSV

Jasmine Fardouly publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jasmine Fardouly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 71
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jasmine Fardouly D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jasmine Fardouly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Jasmine Fardouly is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and conducts research primarily within the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, education, and marketing.

Their research topics cover several key areas:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Fardouly has published extensively across a variety of academic journals. Among their most frequent publication venues are:

  • Body Image (11 publications)
  • Journal of Eating Disorders (10 publications)
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (4 publications)
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (2 publications)
  • Depression and Anxiety (2 publications)

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Risk and Protective Factors for Prospective Changes in Adolescent Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic," 2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Social media and body image: Recent trends and future directions," 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • "Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of eating disorders: findings from a rapid review of the literature," 2022, Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Risk factors for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review," 2023, Journal of Eating Disorders
  • "Eating disorder outcomes: findings from a rapid review of over a decade of research," 2023, Journal of Eating Disorders

Frequent co-authors in their research include Ronald M. Rapee, Natasha R. Magson, Ella L. Oar, Sarah Maguire, and Stephen Touyz, indicating collaborative work in their key areas of study.

Best Publications

  • Risk and Protective Factors for Prospective Changes in Adolescent Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Natasha R. Magson;Justin Y. A. Freeman;Ronald M. Rapee;Cele E. Richardson;Cele E. Richardson

  • Social comparisons on social media: THE impact of Facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood

    Jasmine Fardouly;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Lenny R. Vartanian;Emma Halliwell

  • Social Media and Body Image Concerns: Current Research and Future Directions

    Jasmine Fardouly;Lenny R. Vartanian

  • Negative comparisons about one's appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns.

    Jasmine Fardouly;Lenny R. Vartanian

  • Instagram use and young women’s body image concerns and self-objectification: Testing mediational pathways.

    Jasmine Fardouly;Brydie K Willburger;Lenny R Vartanian

  • The impact of appearance comparisons made through social media, traditional media, and in person in women's everyday lives.

    Jasmine Fardouly;Rebecca T. Pinkus;Lenny R. Vartanian

  • Adolescent development and risk for the onset of social-emotional disorders: a review and conceptual model

    Ronald M. Rapee;Ella L. Oar;Carly J. Johnco;Miriam K. Forbes

  • #BoPo on Instagram: An experimental investigation of the effects of viewing body positive content on young women’s mood and body image:

    Rachel Cohen;Jasmine Fardouly;Toby Newton-John;Amy Slater

  • The Mediating Role of Appearance Comparisons in the Relationship Between Media Usage and Self-Objectification in Young Women:

    Jasmine Fardouly;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Lenny R. Vartanian;Emma Halliwell

  • Eating disorder outcomes: findings from a rapid review of over a decade of research

    Unknown

  • Social media is not real life: the effect of attaching disclaimer-type labels to idealized social media images on women’s body image and mood

    Jasmine Fardouly;Elise Holland

  • #malefitspo: Links between viewing fitspiration posts, muscular-ideal internalisation, appearance comparisons, body satisfaction, and exercise motivation in men:

    Scott J Fatt;Jasmine Fardouly;Ronald M Rapee

  • The impact of no-makeup selfies on young women's body image.

    Jasmine Fardouly;Ronald M. Rapee

  • Protect me from my selfie: Examining the association between photo-based social media behaviors and self-reported eating disorders in adolescence

    Alexandra R. Lonergan;Kay Bussey;Jasmine Fardouly;Scott Griffiths

  • Prevention and early intervention in eating disorders: findings from a rapid review

    Unknown

  • Parental Control of the Time Preadolescents Spend on Social Media: Links with Preadolescents' Social Media Appearance Comparisons and Mental Health

    Jasmine Fardouly;Natasha R Magson;Carly J Johnco;Ella L Oar

  • The use of social media by Australian preadolescents and its links with mental health.

    Jasmine Fardouly;Natasha R. Magson;Ronald M. Rapee;Carly J. Johnco

  • The effect of exposure to parodies of thin-ideal images on young women's body image and mood

    Amy Slater;Natasha Cole;Jasmine Fardouly

  • Changes in weight bias following weight loss: the impact of weight-loss method

    J Fardouly;L R Vartanian

  • The stigma of obesity surgery: negative evaluations based on weight loss history.

    Lenny R. Vartanian;Jasmine Fardouly

  • The longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between selfie-related behaviors and self-objectification and appearance concerns among adolescents:

    Yuhui Wang;Yuhui Wang;Xiaochun Xie;Jasmine Fardouly;Lenny R Vartanian

  • Selfie-viewing and facial dissatisfaction among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model of general attractiveness internalization and body appreciation.

    Yuhui Wang;Jasmine Fardouly;Lenny R. Vartanian;Li Lei

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald M. Rapee
Ronald M. Rapee Macquarie University
Lenny R. Vartanian
Lenny R. Vartanian University of New South Wales
Carly Johnco
Carly Johnco Macquarie University
Miriam K. Forbes
Miriam K. Forbes Macquarie University
Deborah Mitchison
Deborah Mitchison University of Technology Sydney
Phillippa C. Diedrichs
Phillippa C. Diedrichs University of the West of England
Kay Bussey
Kay Bussey Macquarie University
Amy Slater
Amy Slater University of the West of England
Emma Halliwell
Emma Halliwell University of the West of England
Jonathan Mond
Jonathan Mond University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students opt for specialized fields within counseling, helping them focus their education on areas like school counseling, mental health, or marriage and family therapy.

Location matters when selecting a program. For those interested in urban settings, the best counseling degree programs in Chicago offer extensive training and practicum opportunities in a vibrant city environment. Similarly, students seeking Midwestern expertise may explore Cincinnati counseling degree programs or the best counseling degree programs in Cleveland, which are known for connecting graduates with local mental health resources and community support networks.

For those considering the Southeast, the best counseling degree programs in Georgia emphasize both online and hybrid options, making it easier for working professionals to advance their education.

Whether you choose a traditional psychology degree or a more targeted counseling program, your education can lead to careers in mental health services, academic settings, private practice, or community outreach. Always research accredited programs and emerging career trends to make informed decisions about your pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Jasmine Fardouly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles