World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Siân A. McLean

Siân A. McLean

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
7886
World Ranking
6714
National Ranking
397

Siân A. McLean publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Siân A. McLean sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Siân A. McLean D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Siân A. McLean sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Siân A. McLean is affiliated with La Trobe University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology within these domains.

Their work covers various subfields, including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, pharmacy, literature and literary theory, and public health, environmental and occupational health. Key topics addressed in their publications include eating disorders and behaviors, the impact of technology on adolescents, body image and dysmorphia studies, obesity and health practices, media influence and health, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, and aspects related to obesity, physical activity, and diet.

Prominent frequent collaborators in their research include Susan J. Paxton, Hannah K. Jarman, Sarah Maguire, Stephen Touyz, and Danielle Maloney.

Siân A. McLean has contributed extensively to multiple publication venues. Among the most frequent are the Journal of Eating Disorders, Body Image, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Nutrients, and the International Journal of Eating Disorders.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Siân A. McLean include:

  • Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of eating disorders: findings from a rapid review of the literature (2022, Journal of Eating Disorders)
  • A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys (2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence)
  • Risk factors for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review (2023, Journal of Eating Disorders)
  • Social media, body satisfaction and well-being among adolescents: A mediation model of appearance-ideal internalization and comparison (2020, Body Image)
  • Eating disorder outcomes: findings from a rapid review of over a decade of research (2023, Journal of Eating Disorders)

Best Publications

  • Photoshopping the selfie: Self photo editing and photo investment are associated with body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls

    Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton;Eleanor H. Wertheim;Jennifer Masters

  • Social media, body image and food choices in healthy young adults: A mixed methods systematic review

    Kim Rounsefell;Simone Gibson;Siân A McLean;Siân A McLean;Merran Blair

  • Longitudinal Relationships among Internalization of the Media Ideal, Peer Social Comparison, and Body Dissatisfaction: Implications for the Tripartite Influence Model.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton

  • Psychiatric and medical comorbidities of eating disorders: findings from a rapid review of the literature

    Unknown

  • Risk factors for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review

    Unknown

  • Sex differences in the relationships between body dissatisfaction, quality of life and psychological distress

    Scott Griffiths;Scott Griffiths;Phillipa Hay;Deborah Mitchison;Deborah Mitchison;Jonathan M. Mond;Jonathan M. Mond

  • The Contribution of Social Media to Body Dissatisfaction, Eating Disorder Symptoms, and Anabolic Steroid Use Among Sexual Minority Men.

    Scott Griffiths;Stuart B. Murray;Isabel Krug;Siân A. McLean

  • A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys.

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Amy Slater;Chloe S. Gordon;Siân A. McLean

  • A Biopsychosocial Model of Body Image Concerns and Disordered Eating in Early Adolescent Girls

    Rachel F. Rodgers;Rachel F. Rodgers;Susan J. Paxton;Siân A. McLean

  • A pilot evaluation of a social media literacy intervention to reduce risk factors for eating disorders.

    Siân A. McLean;Eleanor H. Wertheim;Jennifer Masters;Susan J. Paxton

  • The role of media literacy in body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: A systematic review.

    Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton;Eleanor H. Wertheim

  • Social media literacy protects against the negative impact of exposure to appearance ideal social media images in young adult women but not men.

    Natalie C. Tamplin;Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton

  • Social media, body satisfaction and well-being among adolescents: A mediation model of appearance-ideal internalization and comparison.

    Hannah K. Jarman;Mathew D. Marques;Siân A. McLean;Amy Slater

  • Internet-delivered targeted group intervention for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in adolescent girls: a randomized controlled trial.

    Brooke E. Heinicke;Susan J. Paxton;Siân A. McLean;Eleanor H. Wertheim

  • Comparison of face‐to‐face and internet interventions for body image and eating problems in adult women: An RCT

    Susan J. Paxton;Siân A. McLean;Emma K. Gollings;Cathy Faulkner

  • Body Image in the Context of Eating Disorders.

    Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton

  • Does Media Literacy Mitigate Risk for Reduced Body Satisfaction Following Exposure to Thin-Ideal Media?

    Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton;Eleanor H. Wertheim

  • Prevention Across the Spectrum: a randomized controlled trial of three programs to reduce risk factors for both eating disorders and obesity

    S.M. Wilksch;S.J. Paxton;Susan Byrne;S.B. Austin

  • Eating disorder outcomes: findings from a rapid review of over a decade of research

    Unknown

  • Epidemiology of eating disorders: population, prevalence, disease burden and quality of life informing public policy in Australia—a rapid review

    Unknown

  • Factors associated with body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in women in midlife

    Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton;Eleanor H. Wertheim

  • Mediators of the relationship between media literacy and body dissatisfaction in early adolescent girls: Implications for prevention

    Siân A. McLean;Susan J. Paxton;Eleanor H. Wertheim

  • A body image and disordered eating intervention for women in midlife: a randomized controlled trial.

    Siân A McLean;Susan J Paxton;Eleanor H Wertheim

  • Relationships between Body Size Attitudes and Body Image of 4-Year-Old Boys and Girls, and Attitudes of Their Fathers and Mothers

    Stephanie R. Damiano;Karen J. Gregg;Emma C. Spiel;SiAcentsn A. McLean

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan J. Paxton
Susan J. Paxton La Trobe University
Rachel F. Rodgers
Rachel F. Rodgers Northeastern University
Eleanor H. Wertheim
Eleanor H. Wertheim La Trobe University
Jonathan Mond
Jonathan Mond University of Tasmania
Amy Slater
Amy Slater University of the West of England
Phillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay Western Sydney University
Bryan Rodgers
Bryan Rodgers Australian National University
Scott Griffiths
Scott Griffiths University of Melbourne
Deborah Mitchison
Deborah Mitchison University of Technology Sydney
Helen Skouteris
Helen Skouteris Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding careers. Many students consider counseling as a prominent pathway, with opportunities growing rapidly across the nation. Online psychology degrees can provide the flexibility and foundational knowledge needed for specialized careers in mental health, counseling, and therapy.

Requirements for becoming a mental health counselor can vary by location. For example, Tampa mental health counselor education requirements emphasize graduate study and supervised clinical experience, while the how to become a mental health counselor in Toledo guide details state-specific licensing and examination steps.

If you’re interested in working in Arizona, review the Tucson mental health counselor certification requirements to understand local expectations. Similarly, the Tulsa mental health counselor education requirements outline the academic and clinical hours needed to practice in Oklahoma.

By pursuing an online psychology degree, you can establish a flexible pathway toward licensure and create positive change in communities across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Siân A. McLean

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles