World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John R. Srigley

John R. Srigley

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17019 16002 713 674 293 26261

John R. Srigley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John R. Srigley between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John R. Srigley published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2013. 8 of the 333 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2013. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1980 2026

333 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John R. Srigley: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 2
1984 4
1985 5
1986 4
1987 4
1988 10
1989 1
1990 2
1991 3
1992 7
1993 2
1994 1
1995 6
1996 3
1997 6
1998 1
1999 4
2000 11
2001 5
2002 3
2003 6
2004 3
2005 5
2006 9
2007 6
2008 4
2009 11
2010 14
2011 17
2012 6
2013 20
2014 20
2015 19
2016 19
2017 12
2018 9
2019 10
2020 7
2021 10
2022 11
2023 20
2024 1
2025 7
2026 1
Total 333
Download as CSV

John R. Srigley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Srigley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 293 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 293
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John R. Srigley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Srigley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John R. Srigley is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant number of publications in subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Artificial Intelligence, Cancer Research, and Rheumatology.

Their main topics of study encompass:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Frequent publication venues for Srigley's work include:

  • Histopathology
  • European Urology
  • Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • The Journal of Urology
  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Some of the most cited recent papers associated with or relevant to their research field are:

  • The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours (2022, European Urology)
  • Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Urinary Tract Tumors (2022, European Urology)
  • WHO 2022 landscape of papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (2022, Histopathology)
  • An introduction to the WHO 5th edition 2022 classification of testicular tumours (2022, Histopathology)

Frequent coauthors in their research collaborations include:

  • Toyonori Tsuzuki
  • Daniel M. Berney
  • Theodorus van der Kwast
  • Mahul B. Amin
  • George J. Netto

Best Publications

  • The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Lars Egevad;Mahul B. Amin;Brett Delahunt

  • The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours

    Gyula Kovacs;Mohammed Akhtar;Bruce J. Beckwith;Peter Bugert

  • The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Mahul B. Amin;Victor R. Reuter;Fathollah K. Mostofi

  • The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia

    John R. Srigley;Brett Delahunt;John N. Eble;Lars Egevad

  • The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading System for Renal Cell Carcinoma and Other Prognostic Parameters

    Brett Delahunt;John C. Cheville;Guido Martignoni;Peter A. Humphrey

  • Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.

    Peter Ström;Kimmo Kartasalo;Henrik Olsson;Leslie Solorzano

  • Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer

    David G. Bostwick;David J. Grignon;M. Elizabeth H. Hammond;Mahul B. Amin

  • Common and Uncommon Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Imaging Spectrum with Pathologic Correlation

    Srinivasa R. Prasad;Peter A. Humphrey;Jay R. Catena;Vamsi R. Narra

  • International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 5: surgical margins

    Puay Hoon Tan;Liang Cheng;John R Srigley;David Griffiths

  • Mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney.

    N. Adsay;John Eble;John Srigley;Edward Jones

  • Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Mahul Amin;Liliane Boccon-Gibod;Lars Egevad

  • International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume.

    Theo H van der Kwast;Mahul B Amin;Athanase Billis;Jonathan I Epstein

  • Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the prostate gland.

    John R. Srigley;Peter A. Humphrey;Mahul B. Amin;Sam S. Chang

  • Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in the kidney tumors: report from the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference.

    Mahul B. Amin;Jonathan I. Epstein;Thomas M. Ulbright;Peter A. Humphrey

  • Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate: morphologic criteria for its distinction from well-differentiated carcinoma.

    David G. Bostwick;John Srigley;David Grignon;John Maksem

  • Collecting duct carcinoma of kidney.

    J. R. Srigley;John Eble

  • International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease.

    Cristina Magi-Galluzzi;Andrew J Evans;Brett Delahunt;Jonathan I Epstein

  • Renal oncocytosis: a morphologic study of fourteen cases.

    Satish K. Tickoo;Victor E. Reuter;Mahul B. Amin;John R. Srigley

  • Tubulocystic carcinoma of the kidney: clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases of a distinctive rare subtype of renal cell carcinoma.

    Mahul B. Amin;Gregory T. MacLennan;Ruta Gupta;David Grignon

  • Cystic nephroma and mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of kidney: a detailed clinicopathologic analysis of 34 cases and proposal for renal epithelial and stromal tumor (REST) as a unifying term.

    Julia Turbiner;Mahul B. Amin;Peter A. Humphrey;John R. Srigley

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Egevad
Lars Egevad Karolinska Institute
Peter A. Humphrey
Peter A. Humphrey Yale University
Mahul B. Amin
Mahul B. Amin University of Tennessee Health Science Center
David J. Grignon
David J. Grignon Indiana University
Jonathan I. Epstein
Jonathan I. Epstein Johns Hopkins University
Victor E. Reuter
Victor E. Reuter Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
James G. Kench
James G. Kench Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Jae Y. Ro
Jae Y. Ro Cornell University
Robert H. Young
Robert H. Young Harvard University
Daniel M. Berney
Daniel M. Berney Barts Health NHS Trust

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore medical studies in the USA, you might also consider alternative online degrees and career pathways that offer flexibility and diverse entry points into healthcare. Many students aim to accelerate their careers by enrolling in programs designed to be completed more quickly than traditional routes. For example, if you're interested in advanced nursing roles, you might explore the fastest dnp program options available online, which can help you earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently.

If you seek less hands-on clinical work, consider a dnp program without clinical hours. These programs provide a focus on leadership, research, or administration rather than patient-facing clinical hours.

For those eager to start working in patient care quickly, you may be curious about what is the fastest way to become an lpn. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) programs online can accelerate your path into healthcare, often requiring less time than other nursing careers.

Finally, mental health is a rapidly growing field, and those interested in this specialty can pursue accelerated msn psychiatric np programs to become advanced practice psychiatric mental health nurses in a shorter timeframe.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Srigley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles