World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter A. Humphrey

Peter A. Humphrey

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
46276
World Ranking
6981
National Ranking
3671

Peter A. Humphrey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Humphrey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 387 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter A. Humphrey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Humphrey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter A. Humphrey is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans several subfields, including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, molecular biology, surgery, oncology, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's research extensively covers topics related to cancer, particularly urogenital cancers and AI applications in oncology. Key topics of focus include:

  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Bladder and urothelial cancer treatments
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Prostate cancer treatment and research
  • Urinary and genital oncology studies

Humphrey's frequent co-authors reflect a collaborative approach in these areas, with notable collaborators being Adebowale Adeniran, Maria Tretiakova, Ming Zhou, Brian Shuch, and Lawrence D. True.

The scientist has published in several key venues, underlining the academic communities they engage with regularly. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
  • Modern Pathology
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations
  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Among the recent papers associated with or relevant to this body of work are:

  • Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • A comparison of sunitinib with cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial (2021, The Lancet)
  • The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer (2020, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine)
  • New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia (2021, Modern Pathology)
  • Novel, emerging and provisional renal entities: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia (2021, Modern Pathology)

Best Publications

  • The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours.

    Holger Moch;Antonio L. Cubilla;Peter A. Humphrey;Victor E. Reuter

  • The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Lars Egevad;Mahul B. Amin;Brett Delahunt

  • The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours.

    Peter A. Humphrey;Holger Moch;Antonio L. Cubilla;Thomas M. Ulbright

  • The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder

    Jonathan I. Epstein;Mahul B. Amin;Victor R. Reuter;Fathollah K. Mostofi

  • The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia

    John R. Srigley;Brett Delahunt;John N. Eble;Lars Egevad

  • WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs

    Holger Moch;Peter A. Humphrey;Thomas M. Ulbright;Victor E. Reuter

  • Structural alterations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in human gliomas

    Albert J. Wong;John M. Ruppert;Sandra H. Bigner;Carl H. Grzeschik

  • Prostate Pathology of Genetically Engineered Mice: Definitions and Classification. The Consensus Report from the Bar Harbor Meeting of the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium Prostate Pathology Committee

    Scott B. Shappell;George V. Thomas;Richard L. Roberts;Ron Herbert

  • The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grading System for Renal Cell Carcinoma and Other Prognostic Parameters

    Brett Delahunt;John C. Cheville;Guido Martignoni;Peter A. Humphrey

  • Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate.

    Peter A Humphrey

  • Detection of intracellular bacterial communities in human urinary tract infection.

    David A S Rosen;Thomas M. Hooton;Walter E. Stamm;Peter A. Humphrey

  • Effect of Inflammation and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Elevated Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Levels

    Robert B. Nadler;Peter A. Humphrey;Deborah S. Smith;William J. Catalona

  • Monoclonal Antibodies against EGFRvIII Are Tumor Specific and React with Breast and Lung Carcinomas and Malignant Gliomas

    Carol J. Wikstrand;Laura P. Hale;Surinder K. Batra;M. Leslie Hill

  • Expression Profiling Reveals Hepsin Overexpression in Prostate Cancer

    Jeffrey A. Magee;Toshiyuki Araki;Sushama Patil;Torsten Ehrig

  • Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.

    Peter Ström;Kimmo Kartasalo;Henrik Olsson;Leslie Solorzano

  • Hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor (c-MET) in prostatic carcinoma.

    Peter A. Humphrey;Xiaopei Zhu;Reza Zarnegar;Paul E. Swanson

  • Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists

    William C. Allsbrook;William C. Allsbrook;Kathy A. Mangold;Kathy A. Mangold;Maribeth H. Johnson;Maribeth H. Johnson;Roger B. Lane;Roger B. Lane

  • Genetic basis for p53 overexpression in human breast cancer.

    A M Davidoff;P A Humphrey;J D Iglehart;J R Marks

  • Common and Uncommon Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Imaging Spectrum with Pathologic Correlation

    Srinivasa R. Prasad;Peter A. Humphrey;Jay R. Catena;Vamsi R. Narra

  • Evaluation of a Vessel Sealing System, Bipolar Electrosurgery, Harmonic Scalpel, Titanium Clips, Endoscopic Gastrointestinal Anastomosis Vascular Staples and Sutures for Arterial and Venous Ligation in a Porcine Model

    Jaime Landman;Kurt Kerbl;Jamil Rehman;Cassio Andreoni

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan I. Epstein
Jonathan I. Epstein Johns Hopkins University
Mahul B. Amin
Mahul B. Amin University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Lars Egevad
Lars Egevad Karolinska Institute
John R. Srigley
John R. Srigley University of Toronto
Rodolfo Montironi
Rodolfo Montironi Marche Polytechnic University
Robin T. Vollmer
Robin T. Vollmer Duke University
Adam S. Kibel
Adam S. Kibel Brigham and Women's Hospital
Ralph V. Clayman
Ralph V. Clayman University of California, Irvine
Thomas M. Wheeler
Thomas M. Wheeler Baylor College of Medicine
Victor E. Reuter
Victor E. Reuter Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine goes beyond medical school. There are a variety of alternative healthcare degrees available online, offering flexibility and diverse career options. Many students are drawn to nursing, where pathways range from entry-level tracks to advanced practice roles.

Cost is a significant factor as you consider your options. If affordability is a top concern, you can review the how much does online nursing school cost guide for a comprehensive cost overview. For registered nurses looking to advance, several cheapest rn to bsn online programs help you earn your bachelor's degree efficiently.

Those seeking advanced practice roles may consider most affordable online nurse practitioner programs to become nurse practitioners with specialization opportunities. If research or academia is your goal, there are also phd in nursing online programs designed to fit working professionals' schedules.

Whether you pursue clinical practice or research, online education in healthcare provides flexible and affordable routes to a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Humphrey

Trending Scientists