World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carla Schlatter Ellis

Carla Schlatter Ellis

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5734
World Ranking
9838
National Ranking
4142

Carla Schlatter Ellis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carla Schlatter Ellis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 82 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Carla Schlatter Ellis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carla Schlatter Ellis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - ACM Fellow For contributions to techniques for energy management technology in mobile devices, and for service to the computing community.
  • 2009 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Carla Schlatter Ellis is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their professional work focuses on energy management technology in mobile devices, as indicated by the recognition they have received in the computing community.

Ellis has been acknowledged with notable awards in their field. In 2010, they were named an ACM Fellow for contributions to techniques for energy management technology in mobile devices and for service to the computing community. The year prior, in 2009, they received the ACM Distinguished Member award.

Details on specific publications, coauthors, or research topics beyond those related to energy management and mobile device technology have not been made available. There are no records of recent papers, frequent publication venues, or book publications listed.

The awards data suggests a career with impactful involvement in the field of computing, particularly related to optimizing energy use in mobile systems, though the precise scope of their research output and collaborations is unspecified.

Best Publications

  • ECOSystem: managing energy as a first class operating system resource

    Heng Zeng;Carla S. Ellis;Alvin R. Lebeck;Amin Vahdat

  • Power aware page allocation

    Alvin R. Lebeck;Xiaobo Fan;Heng Zeng;Carla Ellis

  • File-access characteristics of parallel scientific workloads

    N. Nieuwejaar;D. Kotz;A. Purakayastha;C. Sclatter Ellis

  • Memory controller policies for DRAM power management

    Xiaobo Fan;Carla Ellis;Alvin Lebeck

  • A Sampling-Based Approach to Optimizing Top-k Queries in Sensor Networks

    A.S. Silberstein;R. Braynard;C. Ellis;K. Munagala

  • The case for higher-level power management

    C.S. Ellis

  • Every joule is precious: the case for revisiting operating system design for energy efficiency

    Amin Vahdat;Alvin Lebeck;Carla Schlatter Ellis

  • The synergy between power-aware memory systems and processor voltage scaling

    Xiaobo Fan;Carla S. Ellis;Alvin R. Lebeck

  • Differentiated multimedia Web services using quality aware transcoding

    S. Chandra;C.S. Ellis;A. Vahdat

  • JPEG compression metric as a quality-aware image transcoding

    Surendar Chandra;Carla Schlatter Ellis

  • Experimental comparison of memory management policies for NUMA multiprocessors

    Richard P. Larowe;Carla Schlatter Ellis

  • Concurrent search and insertion in 2---3 trees

    Carla Schlatter Ellis

  • Bridge: a high performance file system for parallel processors

    P.C. Dibble;M.L. Scott;C.S. Ellis

  • Application-level differentiated multimedia Web services using quality aware transcoding

    S. Chandra;C.S. Ellis;A. Vahdat

  • Energy estimation tools for the Palm

    Todd L. Cignetti;Kirill Komarov;Carla Schlatter Ellis

  • Transcoding characteristics of Web images

    Surendar Chandra;Ashish Gehani;Carla Schlatter Ellis;Amin Vahdat

  • Practical prefetching techniques for multiprocessor file systems

    David Kotz;Carla Schlatter Ellis

  • Currentcy: a unifying abstraction for expressing energy management policies

    Heng Zeng;Carla S. Ellis;Alvin R. Lebeck;Amin Vahdat

  • Practical prefetching techniques for parallel file systems

    D. Kotz;C.S. Ellis

  • Prefetching in file systems for MIMD multiprocessors

    D.F. Kotz;C.S. Ellis

  • Prefetching in File Systems for MIMD Multiprocessors.

    Carla Schlatter Ellis;David Kotz

  • Every joule is precious: The case for revisiting operating system design for energ

    Amin M. Vahdat;Alvin Lebeck;Carla Schlatter Ellis

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvin R. Lebeck
Alvin R. Lebeck Duke University
Amin Vahdat
Amin Vahdat Google (United States)
David Kotz
David Kotz Dartmouth College
Jun Yang
Jun Yang Duke University
Kamesh Munagala
Kamesh Munagala Duke University
Pankaj K. Agarwal
Pankaj K. Agarwal Duke University
Lori A. Clarke
Lori A. Clarke University of Massachusetts Amherst
Lori Pollock
Lori Pollock University of Delaware
Mahadev Satyanarayanan
Mahadev Satyanarayanan Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online associate degree programs in Computer Science is a great way to start your journey if you’re looking for maximum flexibility and affordability. These programs provide foundational skills and allow students to study from anywhere, making it easier to balance education with other commitments.

If budget is a concern, consider researching cheap online colleges. Many institutions offer high-quality computer science curricula at reasonable costs, ensuring that a degree stays within reach for more students.

Worried about your academic record? There are plenty of online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, giving a second chance to those who may not have a perfect GPA but are eager to pursue a career in technology.

For those interested in interdisciplinary opportunities, environmental science is another growing field. If you’re curious about how computer science skills might cross over, learn more about what can you do with an environmental science degree to explore diverse, meaningful career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Carla Schlatter Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles