World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9782 9154 963 920 141 6120

Phillippa C. Diedrichs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Phillippa C. Diedrichs between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Phillippa C. Diedrichs published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2023. 23 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2023. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
2009 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Phillippa C. Diedrichs: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 2
2011 3
2012 5
2013 7
2014 7
2015 11
2016 15
2017 11
2018 10
2019 4
2020 6
2021 15
2022 10
2023 19
2024 11
2025 12
Total 149
Download as CSV

Phillippa C. Diedrichs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillippa C. Diedrichs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 141
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Phillippa C. Diedrichs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillippa C. Diedrichs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Phillippa C. Diedrichs is affiliated with the University of the West of England in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in psychology, particularly focusing on clinical psychology and public health. Their work predominantly addresses topics related to eating disorders, body image, and behavioral health interventions.

The main academic fields of study for Phillippa C. Diedrichs include:

  • Psychology

Within these domains, they have contributed to several subfields:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Pharmacy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

The topics covered in their research reflect interests in health behavior and media influence, including:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

Phillippa C. Diedrichs has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Kirsty M. Garbett
  • Paul White
  • Helena Lewis-Smith
  • Emily L. Matheson
  • Nadia Craddock

Their most frequent publication venues illustrate a focus on body image and related health topics:

  • Body Image
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • BMC Public Health
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Phillippa C. Diedrichs demonstrate engagement with empirical studies on body image interventions and their effects among adolescents and young adults. Notable publications include:

  • Evaluating the "Dove Confident Me" Five-Session Body Image Intervention Delivered by Teachers in Schools: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Trial (2020), Journal of Adolescent Health
  • One size does not fit all: Trajectories of body image development and their predictors in early adolescence (2020), Development and Psychopathology
  • Can following body positive or appearance neutral Facebook pages improve young women's body image and mood? Testing novel social media micro-interventions (2023), Body Image
  • Assessing the impact of body image concerns on functioning across life domains: Development and validation of the Body Image Life Disengagement Questionnaire (BILD-Q) among British adolescents (2021), Body Image
  • The effectiveness of brief animated films as a scalable micro-intervention to improve children's body image: A randomised controlled trial (2020), Body Image

Best Publications

  • Social comparisons on social media: THE impact of Facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood

    Jasmine Fardouly;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Lenny R. Vartanian;Emma Halliwell

  • What works in secondary schools? A systematic review of classroom-based body image programs.

    Zali Yager;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Lina A. Ricciardelli;Emma Halliwell

  • #fitspo or #loveyourself? The impact of fitspiration and self-compassion Instagram images on women's body image, self-compassion, and mood.

    Amy Slater;Neesha Varsani;Phillippa C. Diedrichs

  • Weight stigma in maternity care: women’s experiences and care providers’ attitudes

    Kate Mulherin;Yvette D Miller;Yvette D Miller;Fiona Kate Barlow;Phillippa C Diedrichs

  • Systematic review of body image measures.

    Johanna Kling;Linda Kwakkenbos;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Nichola Rumsey

  • Looking age-appropriate while growing old gracefully: A qualitative study of ageing and body image among older adults

    Glen S Jankowski;Phillippa C Diedrichs;Heidi Williamson;Gary Christopher

  • The Mediating Role of Appearance Comparisons in the Relationship Between Media Usage and Self-Objectification in Young Women:

    Jasmine Fardouly;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Lenny R. Vartanian;Emma Halliwell

  • How is men’s conformity to masculine norms related to their body image? Masculinity and muscularity across western countries

    Kristina Holmqvist Gattario;Ann Frisén;Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz;Lina A. Ricciardelli

  • Testing a dissonance body image intervention among young girls.

    Emma Halliwell;Phillippa C. Diedrichs

  • Waif goodbye! Average-size female models promote positive body image and appeal to consumers

    Phillippa C Diedrichs;Christina Lee

  • Happy Being Me in the UK: a controlled evaluation of a school-based body image intervention with pre-adolescent children

    Emma L. Bird;Emma Halliwell;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Diana Harcourt

  • Effectiveness of a brief school-based body image intervention 'Dove Confident Me: Single Session' when delivered by teachers and researchers: Results from a cluster randomised controlled trial

    Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Melissa J. Atkinson;Rebecca J. Steer;Kirsty M. Garbett

  • A randomised-controlled trial investigating potential underlying mechanisms of a functionality-based approach to improving women's body image.

    Jessica M. Alleva;Jessica M. Alleva;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Emma Halliwell;Carolien Martijn

  • How to lose weight bias fast! Evaluating a brief anti-weight bias intervention

    Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • GI Joe or Average Joe? The impact of average-size and muscular male fashion models on men's and women's body image and advertisement effectiveness

    Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Christina Lee

  • The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice

    Chris G. Sibley;Fiona Kate Barlow

  • I’m not just fat, I’m old: has the study of body image overlooked “old talk”?

    Carolyn Black Becker;Phillippa C Diedrichs;Glen Jankowski;Chelsey Werchan

  • Can appearance conversations explain differences between gay and heterosexual men's body dissatisfaction?

    Glen S. Jankowski;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Emma Halliwell

  • Seeing the beauty in everyday people: a qualitative study of young Australians' opinions on body image, the mass media and models.

    Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Christina Lee;Marguerite Kelly

  • Skin Color, Cultural Capital, and Beauty Products: An Investigation of the Use of Skin Fairness Products in Mumbai, India.

    Hemal Shroff;Phillippa C. Diedrichs;Nadia Craddock

  • Media internalization and conformity to traditional masculine norms in relation to body image concerns among men.

    Arthur Y. De Jesus;Lina A. Ricciardelli;Ann Frisén;Linda Smolak

Frequent Co-Authors

Emma Halliwell
Emma Halliwell University of the West of England
Nichola Rumsey
Nichola Rumsey University of the West of England
Fiona Kate Barlow
Fiona Kate Barlow University of Queensland
Ann Frisén
Ann Frisén University of Gothenburg
Diana Harcourt
Diana Harcourt University of the West of England
Lina A. Ricciardelli
Lina A. Ricciardelli Deakin University
Christina Lee
Christina Lee University of Queensland
Chris G. Sibley
Chris G. Sibley University of Auckland
Jasmine Fardouly
Jasmine Fardouly University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling can open doors to rewarding careers in mental health, education, and social services. With the growing demand for skilled professionals, many universities now offer flexible learning options that cater to busy schedules and various career interests.

For those looking for speed and convenience, fastest online counseling programs in Florida are a great fit for students residing in or near the Sunshine State. If you’re interested in programs tailored for Ohio residents, fastest online counseling master's degrees in Ohio offer regionally approved coursework with accelerated timelines.

More broadly, there are accelerated online counseling master's programs in USA that provide flexible study options nationwide—perfect for aspiring counselors seeking a quicker route to licensure or career advancement.

If you live in New York, consider New York accelerated counseling programs online that blend state-specific training with online convenience.

Whether you’re starting your studies or seeking to further your career, these online pathways are designed to help you reach your professional goals efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Phillippa C. Diedrichs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles