World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven Eggermont

Steven Eggermont

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8533 7967 121 114 249 7031

Steven Eggermont publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steven Eggermont between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steven Eggermont published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2016. 10 of the 299 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2016. 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 2 publications
1998 2025

299 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steven Eggermont: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 3
1999 3
2000 6
2001 5
2002 4
2003 1
2004 7
2005 4
2006 11
2007 2
2008 3
2009 1
2010 3
2011 7
2012 25
2013 18
2014 23
2015 29
2016 36
2017 34
2018 15
2019 10
2020 13
2021 10
2022 5
2023 11
2024 8
2025 2
Total 299
Download as CSV

Steven Eggermont publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Eggermont sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 249 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 249
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Steven Eggermont D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven Eggermont sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Steven Eggermont is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has a scholarly focus spanning Social Sciences and Psychology. Their research is notably concerned with the social and psychological impacts of media and technology on adolescents, with extensive work in subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research topics include:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Steven Eggermont's work often appears in journals specializing in adolescent development, communication, and psychology. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Mass Communication & Society
  • Body Image
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior

Examples of recent papers authored or coauthored by Eggermont illustrate their focus areas:

  • "I (Don't) Respect My Body": Investigating the Role of Mass Media Use and Self-Objectification on Adolescents' Positive Body Image in a Cross-National Study (2020), published in Mass Communication & Society
  • Identity Formation, Body Image, and Body-Related Symptoms: Developmental Trajectories and Associations Throughout Adolescence (2022), published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Does Adolescent Media Use Predict Sexual Stereotypes in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood? Associations with Music Television and Online Pornography Exposure (2020), published in Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Framing real beauty: A framing approach to the effects of beauty advertisements on body image and advertising effectiveness (2021), published in Body Image
  • Family technoference: Exploring parent mobile device distraction from children's perspectives (2021), published in Mobile Media & Communication

They collaborate frequently with several other researchers, including:

  • Laura Vandenbosch
  • Orpha de Lenne
  • Helene Laporte
  • Sarah Devos
  • Lore Vankerckhoven

Steven Eggermont's research contributes to understanding how modern media environments influence adolescent psychosocial development and body image, with insights relevant to health, gender studies, and consumer behavior. Their work integrates analysis of media exposure effects with developmental psychology and sociological perspectives.

Best Publications

  • “I don’t want to miss a thing”: Adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress

    Ine Beyens;Eline Frison;Steven Eggermont

  • Exploring the Relationships Between Different Types of Facebook Use, Perceived Online Social Support, and Adolescents' Depressed Mood

    Eline Frison;Steven Eggermont

  • Understanding Sexual Objectification: A Comprehensive Approach Toward Media Exposure and Girls' Internalization of Beauty Ideals, Self‐Objectification, and Body Surveillance

    Laura Vandenbosch;Steven Eggermont

  • Browsing, Posting, and Liking on Instagram: The Reciprocal Relationships Between Different Types of Instagram Use and Adolescents' Depressed Mood.

    Eline Frison;Steven Eggermont

  • Nodding off or switching off? The use of popular media as a sleep aid in secondary-school children

    Steven Eggermont;Jan Van den Bulck

  • The impact of daily stress on adolescents' depressed mood

    Eline Frison;Steven Eggermont

  • Sexting, Mobile Porn Use, and Peer Group Dynamics: Boys' and Girls' Self-Perceived Popularity, Need for Popularity, and Perceived Peer Pressure

    Mariek Vanden Abeele;Scott W. Campbell;Steven Eggermont;Keith Roe

  • The Interrelated Roles of Mass Media and Social Media in Adolescents’ Development of an Objectified Self-Concept: A Longitudinal Study

    Laura Vandenbosch;Steven Eggermont

  • Sexualization of Adolescent Boys: Media Exposure and Boys’ Internalization of Appearance Ideals, Self-Objectification, and Body Surveillance

    Laura Vandenbosch;Steven Eggermont

  • Early Adolescent Boys’ Exposure to Internet Pornography Relationships to Pubertal Timing, Sensation Seeking, and Academic Performance

    Ine Beyens;Laura Vandenbosch;Steven Eggermont

  • “Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger”: Negative Comparison on Facebook and Adolescents' Life Satisfaction Are Reciprocally Related

    Eline Frison;Steven Eggermont

  • The reciprocal and indirect relationships between passive Facebook use, comparison on Facebook, and adolescents' body dissatisfaction

    Ann Rousseau;Steven Eggermont;Eline Frison

  • The Short-Term Longitudinal and Reciprocal Relations Between Peer Victimization on Facebook and Adolescents' Well-Being.

    Eline Frison;Eline Frison;Kaveri Subrahmanyam;Steven Eggermont

  • Popularity through Online Harm: The Longitudinal Associations between Cyberbullying and Sociometric Status in Early Adolescence.

    Denis Wegge;Heidi Vandebosch;Steven Eggermont;Sara Pabian

  • Television Viewing, Perceived Similarity, and Adolescents' Expectations of a Romantic Partner

    Steven Eggermont

  • Towards the desired future of the elderly and ICT: policy recommendations based on a dialogue with senior citizens

    Steven Eggermont;Heidi Vandebosch;Stef Steyaert

  • Like me (please?): Connecting online self-presentation to pre- and early adolescents’ self-esteem:

    Anneleen Meeus;Kathleen Beullens;Steven Eggermont

  • Active public Facebook use and adolescents' feelings of loneliness: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship.

    Kexin Wang;Eline Frison;Eline Frison;Steven Eggermont;Laura Vandenbosch;Laura Vandenbosch

  • Media use as a reason for meal skipping and fast eating in secondary school children.

    J. Van den Bulck;S. Eggermont

  • Putting Young Children in Front of the Television: Antecedents and Outcomes of Parents’ Use of Television as a Babysitter

    Ine Beyens;Steven Eggermont

  • Cyberbullying research in Belgium: An overview of generated insights and a critical assessment of the mediating role of technology in cyberbullying in a Web 2.0-world

    W. Heirman;M. Walrave;Heidi Vandebosch;Denis Wegge

Frequent Co-Authors

Lien Goossens
Lien Goossens Ghent University
John Van Camp
John Van Camp Ghent University
Caroline Braet
Caroline Braet Ghent University
Jan Van den Bulck
Jan Van den Bulck University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lea Maes
Lea Maes Ghent University
Michel Walrave
Michel Walrave University of Antwerp
Amy I. Nathanson
Amy I. Nathanson The Ohio State University
L. Monique Ward
L. Monique Ward University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rachel F. Rodgers
Rachel F. Rodgers Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students pursue traditional careers such as counseling, therapy, or research, but there is growing interest in specialized roles like Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBA). Careers as a BCBA are especially popular among those interested in applied behavior analysis, working with individuals with autism, and developing behavioral intervention plans.

To chart your path, consider the bcba certification requirements in Greensboro as a first step in understanding educational and practical prerequisites. For those looking to enter the field in Nevada, learn more about becoming a bcba in Henderson. Each location has its own process and challenges, so research is crucial.

If you are interested in working in unique communities, the guide on how to become a bcba in Honolulu sheds light on requirements for island-based practitioners. For those considering Texas, see how to become a bcba in Houston for insights into local opportunities and criteria. Each link helps clarify the necessary steps and online degree options available for aspiring psychologists and behavior analysts.

Best Scientists Citing Steven Eggermont

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles