World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
14254
World Ranking
4168
National Ranking
2329

L. Monique Ward publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. Monique Ward sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

L. Monique Ward D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. Monique Ward sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

L. Monique Ward is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the social sciences and psychology, contributing extensively to the understanding of gender studies and related subfields. Their work has addressed complex issues in gender roles, media influence, and the psychological effects of sexual objectification.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these broad fields, their research further spans several subfields, such as:

  • Gender Studies
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • General Health Professions

The dominant themes in Ward's scholarly output involve:

  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Ward has contributed to several publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Body Image
  • Psychology of Women Quarterly
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Psychology of Men & Masculinity
  • The Journal of Sex Research

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Ward include:

  • "Media and the Development of Gender Role Stereotypes," 2020, Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
  • "The sources and consequences of sexual objectification," 2023, Nature Reviews Psychology

Other notable related papers, though authored by colleagues, cover topics closely aligned with Ward's research interests:

  • "Becoming an object: A review of self-objectification in girls," 2020, Body Image
  • "Interpersonal Sexual Objectification, Jezebel Stereotype Endorsement, and Justification of Intimate Partner Violence Toward Women," 2020, Psychology of Women Quarterly
  • "Steeped in Shame: An Exploration of Family Sexual Socialization Among Black College Women," 2020, Psychology of Women Quarterly

Collaborations form an important part of Ward's scholarly activity. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Petal Grower
  • Stephanie J. Rowley
  • Elizabeth A. Daniels
  • Morgan C. Jerald
  • Sarah L. Trinh

Best Publications

  • The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies.

    Shelly Grabe;L. Monique Ward;Janet Shibley Hyde

  • Understanding the Role of Entertainment Media in the Sexual Socialization of American Youth: A Review of Empirical Research.

    L. Monique Ward

  • Does Television Exposure Affect Emerging Adults' Attitudes and Assumptions About Sexual Relationships? Correlational and Experimental Confirmation

    L. Monique Ward

  • Using TV as a Guide: Associations Between Television Viewing and Adolescents' Sexual Attitudes and Behavior

    L. Monique Ward;Kimberly Friedman

  • Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most.

    L. Monique Ward

  • Contributions of Music Video Exposure to Black Adolescents’ Gender and Sexual Schemas:

    L. Monique Ward;Edwina Hansbrough;Eboni Walker

  • Contributions of entertainment television to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and expectations: The role of viewing amount versus viewer involvement

    L. Monique Ward;Rocio Rivadeneyra

  • Who's that Girl: Television's Role in the Body Image Development of Young White and Black Women:

    Deborah Schooler;L. Monique Ward;Ann Merriwether;Allison Caruthers

  • Media and Sexualization: State of Empirical Research, 1995–2015

    L. Monique Ward

  • Cycles of shame: menstrual shame, body shame, and sexual decision-making.

    Deborah Schooler;L. Monique Ward;Ann Merriwether;Allison S. Caruthers

  • Facebook Involvement, Objectified Body Consciousness, Body Shame, and Sexual Assertiveness in College Women and Men

    Adriana M. Manago;L. Monique Ward;Kristi M. Lemm;Lauren Reed

  • Wading through the stereotypes: positive and negative associations between media use and black adolescents' conceptions of self.

    L. Monique Ward

  • “Anything From Making Out to Having Sex”: Men's Negotiations of Hooking Up and Friends With Benefits Scripts

    Marina Epstein;Jerel P. Calzo;Andrew P. Smiler;L. Monique Ward

  • Snooping and Sexting: Digital Media as a Context for Dating Aggression and Abuse Among College Students

    Lauren A. Reed;Richard M. Tolman;L. Monique Ward

  • Media Exposure and Viewers' Attitudes Toward Homosexuality: Evidence for Mainstreaming or Resonance?

    Jerel P. Calzo;L. Monique Ward

  • Gender matters: Experiences and consequences of digital dating abuse victimization in adolescent dating relationships

    Lauren A. Reed;Richard M. Tolman;L. Monique Ward

  • “Always Use Protection”: Communication Boys Receive About Sex From Parents, Peers, and the Media

    Marina Epstein;L. Monique Ward

  • Breasts are for men: Media, masculinity ideologies, and men's beliefs about women's bodies

    L. Monique Ward;Ann Merriwether;Allison Caruthers

  • Silence speaks volumes: Parental sexual communication among asian american emerging adults

    Janna L. Kim;Janna L. Kim;L. Monique Ward

  • Contributions of Social Comparison and Self-Objectification in Mediating Associations Between Facebook Use and Emergent Adults' Psychological Well-Being

    Emily Hanna;L. Monique Ward;Rita C. Seabrook;Morgan Jerald

  • Controlling images: How awareness of group stereotypes affects Black women's well-being.

    Morgan C. Jerald;Elizabeth R. Cole;L. Monique Ward;Lanice R. Avery

  • Average Joes: Men's relationships with media, real bodies, and sexuality

    Deborah Schooler;L. Monique Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Tolman
Richard M. Tolman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jerel P. Calzo
Jerel P. Calzo San Diego State University
Gail E. Wyatt
Gail E. Wyatt University of California, Los Angeles
Rebecca L. Collins
Rebecca L. Collins RAND Corporation
Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sarah M. Coyne
Sarah M. Coyne Brigham Young University
Kristen Harrison
Kristen Harrison University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Edward Donnerstein
Edward Donnerstein University of Arizona
Stephanie J. Rowley
Stephanie J. Rowley University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying psychology in the USA, it's worth considering related fields such as social work. Online degrees in social work are popular for their flexibility and for equipping students with the skills to support individuals and communities facing challenges related to mental health, family dynamics, and societal issues.

Choosing the right online degree depends on both value and quality. For instance, the most valuable online social work degree programs in Nevada and the most valuable online social work degree programs in Ohio offer comprehensive curricula that prepare graduates for diverse career opportunities. Similarly, the most valuable online social work degree programs in Tennessee highlight pathways for students who want to combine psychology with practical, hands-on social support experience.

For students focused on affordability, the best value online social work degrees in Texas stand out for offering strong career prospects without high tuition costs. Exploring these programs can open doors to roles in healthcare, counseling, education, and community services—making them an excellent complement or alternative to traditional psychology degrees.

Best Scientists Citing L. Monique Ward

Trending Scientists