World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3112 2867 1767 1591 196 15938

Sarah M. Coyne publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sarah M. Coyne between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sarah M. Coyne published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2022. 38 of the 249 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2022. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 22 publications
2003 2025

249 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sarah M. Coyne: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 3
2008 6
2009 4
2010 6
2011 16
2012 15
2013 10
2014 8
2015 9
2016 14
2017 12
2018 18
2019 11
2020 16
2021 10
2022 24
2023 22
2024 16
2025 22
Total 249
Download as CSV

Sarah M. Coyne publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah M. Coyne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 196
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sarah M. Coyne D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah M. Coyne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sarah M. Coyne is affiliated with Brigham Young University in the United States and focuses on research primarily within the social sciences and psychology. Their scholarly work spans 168 publications in social sciences and 51 in psychology, highlighting a diverse engagement with multiple disciplines.

The research topics addressed by Coyne concentrate on several thematic areas including:

  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

Coyne's work intersects with subfields such as education, sociology and political science, gender studies, clinical psychology, and social psychology, reflecting broad interdisciplinary inquiry.

Frequently published venues include:

  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Infancy
  • Journal of Children and Media
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Sex Roles

Notable recent papers demonstrate the scope of Coyne's research focus:

  • "Tantrums, toddlers and technology: Temperament, media emotion regulation, and problematic media use in early childhood" (2021, Computers in Human Behavior)
  • "Bored and online: Reasons for using social media, problematic social networking site use, and behavioral outcomes across the transition from adolescence to emerging adulthood" (2020, Journal of Adolescence)
  • "Young Children's Use of Smartphones and Tablets" (2020, PEDIATRICS)
  • "Beyond Screen Time: A Synergistic Approach to a More Comprehensive Assessment of Family Media Exposure During Early Childhood" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Growing Up with Grand Theft Auto: A 10-Year Study of Longitudinal Growth of Violent Video Game Play in Adolescents" (2020, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking)

Coyne has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Jane Shawcroft, Laura Stockdale, Hailey G. Holmgren, Megan Gale, and Megan Van Alfen.

Their published books include a title on early childhood and digital media released by Cambridge University Press in 2024.

Best Publications

  • An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression

    John Archer;Sarah M. Coyne

  • “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being.

    Brandon T. McDaniel;Sarah M. Coyne

  • Does time spent using social media impact mental health?: An eight year longitudinal study.

    Sarah M. Coyne;Adam A. Rogers;Jessica D. Zurcher;Laura Stockdale

  • New mothers and media use: associations between blogging, social networking, and maternal well-being.

    Brandon T. McDaniel;Sarah M. Coyne;Erin K. Holmes

  • A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: the moderating role of age.

    Christopher Barlett;Sarah M. Coyne

  • Emerging in a Digital World A Decade Review of Media Use, Effects, and Gratifications in Emerging Adulthood

    Sarah M. Coyne;Laura M. Padilla-Walker;Emily Howard

  • We're not friends anymore! unless... : The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression

    Sarah M. Coyne;John Archer;Mike Eslea

  • "I Luv U :)!": A Descriptive Study of the Media Use of Individuals in Romantic Relationships

    Sarah Coyne;Laura Ann Stockdale;Dean Busby;Bethany Iverson

  • Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior.

    Kevin M. Collier;Sarah M. Coyne;Eric E. Rasmussen;Alan J. Hawkins

  • Internet Gaming Disorder in Children and Adolescents

    Douglas A. Gentile;Kira Bailey;Daphne Bavelier;Daphne Bavelier;Jeanne Funk Brockmyer

  • Pretty as a Princess: Longitudinal Effects of Engagement With Disney Princesses on Gender Stereotypes, Body Esteem, and Prosocial Behavior in Children

    Sarah M. Coyne;Jennifer Ruh Linder;Eric E. Rasmussen;David A. Nelson

  • Media violence, physical aggression, and relational aggression in school age children: A short-term longitudinal study.

    Douglas A. Gentile;Sarah Coyne;David A. Walsh

  • Getting a High-Speed Family Connection: Associations between Family Media Use and Family Connection.

    Laura M. Padilla-Walker;Sarah Coyne;Ashley Michelle Fraser

  • Technology interference in the parenting of young children: Implications for mothers’ perceptions of coparenting

    Brandon T. McDaniel;Sarah M. Coyne

  • High School Teachers' Perceptions of Cyberbullying Prevention and Intervention Strategies.

    Sterling Stauffer;Melissa Allen Heath;Sarah Marie Coyne;Scott Ferrin

  • Video game addiction in emerging adulthood: Cross-sectional evidence of pathology in video game addicts as compared to matched healthy controls.

    Laura Ann Stockdale;Sarah Coyne

  • Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10- to 20-year-old adolescents.

    Laura A. Stockdale;Sarah M. Coyne;Laura M. Padilla-Walker

  • Bored and online: Reasons for using social media, problematic social networking site use, and behavioral outcomes across the transition from adolescence to emerging adulthood.

    Laura A. Stockdale;Sarah M. Coyne

  • Game on… girls: associations between co-playing video games and adolescent behavioral and family outcomes.

    Sarah M. Coyne;Laura M. Padilla-Walker;Laura Stockdale;Randal D. Day

  • Young Children’s Use of Smartphones and Tablets

    Jenny S. Radesky;Heidi M. Weeks;Rosa Ball;Alexandria Schaller

  • Parents and adolescents growing up in the digital age: latent growth curve analysis of proactive media monitoring.

    Laura M. Padilla-Walker;Sarah Coyne;Ashley Michelle Fraser;W Justin Dyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura M. Padilla-Walker
Laura M. Padilla-Walker Brigham Young University
Douglas A. Gentile
Douglas A. Gentile Iowa State University
John Archer
John Archer University of Central Lancashire
Brad J. Bushman
Brad J. Bushman The Ohio State University
Craig H. Hart
Craig H. Hart Brigham Young University
Randal D. Day
Randal D. Day Brigham Young University
Craig A. Anderson
Craig A. Anderson Iowa State University
Dean M. Busby
Dean M. Busby Brigham Young University
Larry J. Nelson
Larry J. Nelson Brigham Young University
Amy I. Nathanson
Amy I. Nathanson The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens multiple pathways for academic and professional growth. Many students interested in human behavior also consider fields like social work, counseling, and mental health services. Online degrees in these related areas offer the flexibility to balance education with work or family commitments and can prepare graduates for rewarding roles in diverse settings.

If you're looking to expand your options beyond psychology, consider pursuing qualifications in social work. Many universities across the U.S. offer reputable online social work programs. For example, the best social work programs in Jackson provide a strong foundation in community services, while the top social work programs in Louisiana focus on real-world practice and advocacy.

Other notable options include the best social work degrees in Memphis for students seeking specialized skills, or those interested in urban, multicultural environments may consider the top social work degrees in Miami. Each program links psychological principles with practical training, preparing graduates for impactful careers in social services, school systems, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah M. Coyne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles