World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
9523
World Ranking
7781
National Ranking
4180

Marion K. Underwood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marion K. Underwood sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marion K. Underwood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marion K. Underwood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marion K. Underwood is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with significant contributions also spanning Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Education, Clinical Psychology, and Communication.

Underwood's research concentrates on topics related to the impact of technology on adolescents, child development influenced by digital technology, social media and political dynamics, gender and feminism in media, eating disorders and behaviors, media influence on health, and the intersections of media, gender, and advertising.

Recent publications illustrate this focus, including:

  • "Snapchat lenses and body image concerns," 2021, published in New Media & Society
  • "Associations between Self-Reports and Device-Reports of Social Networking Site Use: An Application of the Truth and Bias Model," 2021, published in Communication Methods and Measures
  • "Importance of Digital Communication in Adolescents' Development: Theoretical and Empirical Advancements in the Last Decade," 2021, published in Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • "Browsing Different Instagram Profiles and Associations With Psychological Well-Being," 2020, published in Frontiers in Human Dynamics
  • "'Ur a freakin goddess!': Examining appearance commentary on Instagram," 2021, published in Psychology of Popular Media

They have also published multiple works in venues such as Frontiers in Human Dynamics and the Journal of Child and Family Studies, with additional publications in New Media & Society, Communication Methods and Measures, and the Journal of Research on Adolescence.

Frequent coauthors include Kaitlyn Burnell, Madeleine J. George, Allycen R. Kurup, Samuel E. Ehrenreich, and Diana J. Meter. Collaboration with these researchers spans various publications related to digital communication, social networking use, and adolescent psychological well-being.

Best Publications

  • A developmental investigation of social aggression among children.

    Britt Rachelle Galen;Marion K. Underwood

  • Social Aggression among Girls

    Marion K. Underwood

  • Gender Differences in Young Adolescents' Experiences of Peer Victimization: Social and Physical Aggression.

    Julie A. Paquette;Marion K. Underwood

  • Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along?

    Marion K. Underwood;Britt R. Galen;Julie A. Paquette

  • Display rules for anger and aggression in school-age children.

    Marion K. Underwood;John D. Coie;Cheryl R. Herbsman

  • Effectiveness of a social relations intervention program for aggressive and nonaggressive, rejected children.

    John E. Lochman;John D. Coie;Marion K. Underwood;Robert Terry

  • Sticks and stones and social exclusion: Aggression among girls and boys.

    Marion K. Underwood

  • Continuity and change in social and physical aggression from middle childhood through early adolescence.

    Marion K. Underwood;Kurt J. Beron;Lisa H. Rosen

  • The power and the pain of adolescents’ digital communication: Cyber victimization and the perils of lurking.

    Marion K. Underwood;Samuel E. Ehrenreich

  • Children's understanding of their research rights before and after debriefing: informed assent, confidentiality, and stopping participation.

    Jennifer C. Hurley;Marion K. Underwood

  • Programmatic intervention with aggressive children in the school setting.

    John D. Coie;Marion Underwood;John E. Lochman

  • Prosocial Behavior: Long-Term Trajectories and Psychosocial Outcomes.

    Elinor Flynn;Samuel E. Ehrenreich;Kurt J. Beron;Marion K. Underwood

  • The blackberry project: Capturing the content of adolescents' text messaging

    Marion K. Underwood;Lisa H. Rosen;David More;Samuel E. Ehrenreich

  • Top Ten Pressing Questions About the Development of Emotion Regulation

    Marion K. Underwood

  • Principles of cyberbullying research: definitions, measures, and methodology

    Sheri Bauman;Marion K. Underwood;Noel A. Card

  • An Experimental, Observational Investigation of Children's Responses to Peer Provocation: Developmental and Gender Differences in Middle Childhood

    Marion K. Underwood;Jennifer C. Hurley;Chantrelle A. Johanson;Jennifer E. Mosley

  • Childhood Peer Sociometric Status and Aggression as Predictors of Adolescent Childbearing.

    Marion K. Underwood;Janis B. Kupersmidt;John D. Coie

  • Peer social status and children's understanding of the expression and control of positive and negative emotions

    Marion K. Underwood

  • Social development : relationships in infancy, childhood, and adolescence

    Marion K. Underwood;Lisa H. Rosen

  • Aggression and Peer Rejection in Childhood

    John D. Coie;Mark Belding;Marion Underwood

  • Passive Social Networking Site Use and Well-Being: The Mediating Roles of Social Comparison and the Fear of Missing Out

    Kaitlyn Burnell;Madeleine J. George;Justin W. Vollet;Samuel E. Ehrenreich

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Coie
John D. Coie Duke University
Sarah M. Coyne
Sarah M. Coyne Brigham Young University
Duane Buhrmester
Duane Buhrmester The University of Texas at Dallas
Noel A. Card
Noel A. Card University of Georgia
John E. Lochman
John E. Lochman University of Alabama
Craig A. Anderson
Craig A. Anderson Iowa State University
Paul Boxer
Paul Boxer Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Amy E. Pinkham
Amy E. Pinkham The University of Texas at Dallas
Hervé Abdi
Hervé Abdi The University of Texas at Dallas
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to numerous rewarding career pathways, especially in mental health services. Many students consider becoming a licensed therapist, which involves meeting strict educational and professional standards. Online degrees in counseling or psychology can offer the flexibility needed to start this journey, but it's crucial to understand the licensure process, which varies considerably depending on location.

For example, the process for becoming a licensed therapist in New Orleans requires earning a graduate degree, passing specific exams, and completing supervised practice. Similarly, New York City licensed therapist requirements include unique state-mandated coursework and experience hours. Students in New Jersey must also navigate specific steps for Newark licensed therapist requirements, while becoming a licensed therapist in Norfolk has its own regional regulations.

Choosing the right online degree can help you meet these varied licensure criteria. Be sure to research state-specific regulations and accredited online programs to enhance your career prospects in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Marion K. Underwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles