World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Duane Buhrmester publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Duane Buhrmester between 1982 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Duane Buhrmester published across 35 years, from 1982 to 2016, averaging 1.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 4 publications in 1989. 5 of the 45 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 4. Peak 4 publications in 1989. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications
1982 2016

45 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Duane Buhrmester: publications per year, 1982 to 2016
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 3
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 4
1990 2
1991 0
1992 4
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 1
2010 1
2011 4
2012 2
2013 3
2014 2
2015 3
2016 2
Total 45
Download as CSV

Duane Buhrmester publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duane Buhrmester sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Duane Buhrmester D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duane Buhrmester sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Duane Buhrmester was affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States.

Throughout their career, Duane Buhrmester contributed to academic research without distinct records of published papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues listed. Likewise, there is no available information on dedicated books authored or edited by Buhrmester.

The available data does not specify main fields or subfields of study, nor does it enumerate particular topics of research focus. Similarly, there are no recorded awards or recognitions associated with their career.

The absence of detailed research output or collaborations suggests limited publicly documented academic activity, or that the records may be incomplete. Duane Buhrmester is recorded as deceased, which positions all references to their career in the past tense.

Best Publications

  • Children's perceptions of the personal relationships in their social networks.

    Wyndol Furman;Duane Buhrmester

  • Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships.

    Wyndol Furman;Duane Buhrmester

  • The development of companionship and intimacy.

    Duane Buhrmester;Wyndol Furman

  • Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships.

    Duane Buhrmester;Wyndol Furman;Mitchell T. Wittenberg;Harry T. Reis

  • Children's perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships.

    Wyndol Furman;Duane Buhrmester

  • Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence.

    Duane Buhrmester

  • Perceptions of sibling relationships during middle childhood and adolescence.

    Duane Buhrmester;Wyndol Furman

  • The Network of Relationships Inventory: Behavioral Systems Version.

    Wyndol Furman;Duane Buhrmester

  • Patterns and functions of self-disclosure during childhood and adolescence.

    Duane Buhrmester;Karen Prager

  • Transition to college: Network changes, social skills, and loneliness.

    Phillip Shaver;Wyndol Furman;Duane Buhrmester

  • The Changing Functions of Friends in Childhood: A Neo-Sullivanian Perspective

    Duane Buhrmester;Wyndol Duane Furman

  • Friendship and Need Fulfillment During Three Phases of Young Adulthood

    Julie Carbery;Duane Buhrmester

  • The mediating role of interpersonal competence between adolescents' empathy and friendship quality: a dyadic approach.

    Chong Man Chow;Holly Ruhl;Duane Buhrmester

  • Intimacy and Need Fulfillment in Couple Relationships

    Karen J. Prager;Duane Buhrmester

  • Gender Differences in Early Adolescents' Relationship Qualities, Self-Efficacy, and Depression Symptoms.

    Sharon Rae Jenkins;Kelly Goodness;Duane Buhrmester

  • Mothers and Fathers Interacting in Dyads and Triads with Normal and Hyperactive Sons.

    Duane Buhrmester;Lorinda Camparo;Andrew Christensen;Lauren Shapiro Gonzalez

  • Does Stimulant Medication Improve the Peer Status of Hyperactive Children

    Carol K. Whalen;Barbara Henker;Duane Buhrmester;Stephen P. Hinshaw

  • Competitiveness, Gender, and Adjustment Among Adolescents

    David R. Hibbard;Duane Buhrmester

  • Peer relations as a developmental context.

    William M. Bukowski;Duane Buhrmester;Marion K. Underwood

  • The Developmental Courses of Sibling and Peer Relationships: Duane Buhrmester

    Frits Boer;Judy Dunn;Judith F. Dunn

Frequent Co-Authors

Wyndol Furman
Wyndol Furman University of Denver
Stephen P. Hinshaw
Stephen P. Hinshaw University of California, Berkeley
Marion K. Underwood
Marion K. Underwood Purdue University West Lafayette
Harry T. Reis
Harry T. Reis University of Rochester
Carol K. Whalen
Carol K. Whalen University of California, Irvine
Andrew Christensen
Andrew Christensen University of California, Los Angeles
Barbara Henker
Barbara Henker University of California, Los Angeles
Doran C. French
Doran C. French Purdue University West Lafayette
William M. Bukowski
William M. Bukowski Concordia University
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of career opportunities, often requiring specialized training beyond an undergraduate degree. Many students consider online programs for greater flexibility and value, especially when aiming for licensure in counseling or therapy roles.

If you’re interested in finding reputable programs, explore the best value counseling programs in Wisconsin or check out the most valuable counseling master's degree programs ranking in Florida. These lists consider factors like affordability, accreditation, and graduate success rates.

For those looking across broader regions, the best value counseling master's degrees in the South highlight top-performing online colleges with robust counseling programs. Meanwhile, New York residents and online learners nationwide might consider the best value counseling programs in New York to find programs that balance cost, quality, and career outcomes.

Online degrees can be an effective path to roles such as licensed counselor, school psychologist, or mental health practitioner. Be sure to verify that your chosen online program meets state licensure requirements and provides the student support you need to succeed.

Best Scientists Citing Duane Buhrmester

Recently Published Articles