World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kimberly A. Updegraff

Kimberly A. Updegraff

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5867 5454 3185 2890 208 11330

Kimberly A. Updegraff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kimberly A. Updegraff between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kimberly A. Updegraff published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2016. 15 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2016. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications
1995 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kimberly A. Updegraff: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 4
1997 3
1998 0
1999 2
2000 4
2001 3
2002 3
2003 0
2004 2
2005 4
2006 3
2007 3
2008 2
2009 5
2010 4
2011 13
2012 10
2013 9
2014 14
2015 19
2016 20
2017 19
2018 14
2019 9
2020 5
2021 15
2022 7
2023 3
2024 10
2025 5
Total 215
Download as CSV

Kimberly A. Updegraff publications per year - data summary

  • Kimberly A. Updegraff, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, has 215 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1995, with 1 publication.
  • 2 of the 31 years in the span carry no publications at all (1998 and 2003).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.4 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 40 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 26 publications (2.4 per year); 2006-2016: 102 publications (9.3 per year); 2017-2025: 87 publications (9.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Kimberly A. Updegraff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly A. Updegraff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 208
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kimberly A. Updegraff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Kimberly A. Updegraff, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, records 208 publications - the 71st percentile of the discipline.
  • 71% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Kimberly A. Updegraff, and about 29% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Kimberly A. Updegraff ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Kimberly A. Updegraff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly A. Updegraff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Kimberly A. Updegraff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Kimberly A. Updegraff, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, records 48 D-Index - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Kimberly A. Updegraff, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Kimberly A. Updegraff falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Kimberly A. Updegraff is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within social sciences and psychology, with 51 and 41 publications respectively. Their research spans multiple subfields, including clinical psychology, education, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, and safety research.

Their work often addresses key topics such as early childhood education and development, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, cognitive abilities and testing, racial and ethnic identity research, family and disability support research, parental involvement in education, and family support in illness.

Updegraff has contributed to various publication venues, frequently appearing in Developmental Psychology, Journal of Family Psychology, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Child Development, and Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Updegraff include:

  • "Familism values and adjustment among Hispanic/Latino individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2021, Psychological Bulletin
  • "Implications of COVID-19 school closures for sibling dynamics among U.S. Latinx children: A prospective, daily diary study," 2021, Developmental Psychology
  • "Contextual Moderators of a School-Based Ethnic-Racial Identity Intervention: The Roles of Family Ethnic Socialization and Ethnic-Racial Background," 2020, Prevention Science
  • "Sexual Minority Adolescents' Disclosure of Sexual Identity to Family: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework," 2021, Adolescent Research Review
  • "Mexican-origin family members' unique and shared family perspectives of familism values and their links with parent-youth relationship quality," 2020, Developmental Psychology

Frequent collaborators in Updegraff's work include Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor, Susan M. McHale, Daye Son, Laudan B. Jahromi, and Jenny Padilla, with collaboration counts ranging from 6 to 27 co-authored works.

Best Publications

  • Latino adolescents’ mental health: Exploring the interrelations among discrimination, ethnic identity, cultural orientation, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms

    Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor;Kimberly A. Updegraff

  • Sibling Relationships and Influences in Childhood and Adolescence.

    Susan M. McHale;Kimberly A. Updegraff;Shawn D. Whiteman

  • The Mexican American Cultural Values Scale for Adolescents and Adults

    George P. Knight;Nancy A. Gonzales;Delia S. Saenz;Darya D. Bonds

  • Adolescent sibling relationships in mexican american families : Exploring the role of familism

    Kimberly A. Updegraff;Susan M. McHale;Shawn D. Whiteman;Shawna M. Thayer

  • Congruence between Mothers' and Fathers' Differential Treatment of Siblings: Links with Family Relations and Children's Well-Being

    Susan M. McHale;Ann C. Crouter;Shirley A. McGuire;Kimberly A. Updegraff

  • Conditions Underlying Parents' Knowledge about Children's Daily Lives in Middle Childhood: Between‐ and Within‐Family Comparisons

    Ann C. Crouter;Heather Helms-Erikson;Kimberly Updegraff;Susan M. McHale

  • When Does Parents’ Differential Treatment Have Negative Implications for Siblings?

    Susan M. McHale;Kimberly A. Updegraff;Julia Jackson-Newsom;Corinna J. Tucker

  • Parents' Involvement in Adolescents' Peer Relationships: A Comparison of Mothers' and Fathers' Roles

    Kimberly A. Updegraff;Susan M. McHale;Ann C. Crouter;Kristina Kupanoff

  • Sibling influences on gender development in middle childhood and early adolescence: a longitudinal study.

    Susan M. McHale;Kimberly A. Updegraff;Heather Helms-Erikson;Ann C. Crouter

  • Impact of Arizona’s SB 1070 Immigration Law on Utilization of Health Care and Public Assistance Among Mexican-Origin Adolescent Mothers and Their Mother Figures

    Russell B. Toomey;Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor;David R. Williams;Elizabeth Harvey-Mendoza

  • Mexican-Origin Adolescent Mothers' Stressors and Psychosocial Functioning: Examining Ethnic Identity Affirmation and Familism as Moderators.

    Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor;Kimberly A. Updegraff;Melinda A. Gonzales-Backen

  • Family ethnic socialization and ethnic identity: A family-driven, youth-driven, or reciprocal process?

    Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor;Katharine H. Zeiders;Kimberly A. Updegraff

  • Course enrollment as self-regulatory behavior: Who takes optional high school math courses?

    Kimberly A. Updegraff;Jacquelynne S. Eccles;Bonnie L. Barber;Kathryn M. O'brien

  • Older siblings as socializers of younger siblings' empathy

    Corinna Jenkins Tucker;Kimberly A. Updegraff;Susan M. McHale;Ann C. Crouter

  • Adolescents' sibling relationship and friendship experiences: Developmental patterns and relationship linkages

    Kimberly A. Updegraff;Susan M. McHale;Ann C. Crouter

  • Discrimination and Mexican-Origin Adolescents’ Adjustment: The Moderating Roles of Adolescents’, Mothers’, and Fathers’ Cultural Orientations and Values

    Melissa Y. Delgado;Kimberly A. Updegraff;Mark W. Roosa;Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor

  • Exploring Mothers’ and Fathers’ Relationships with Sons Versus Daughters: Links to Adolescent Adjustment in Mexican Immigrant Families

    Kimberly A. Updegraff;Melissa Y. Delgado;Lorey A. Wheeler

  • Siblings’ Differential Treatment in Mexican American Families

    Susan M. McHale;Kimberly A. Updegraff;Lilly Shanahan;Ann C. Crouter

  • Familism values and adjustment among Hispanic/Latino individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Unknown

  • A Universal Intervention Program Increases Ethnic-Racial Identity Exploration and Resolution to Predict Adolescent Psychosocial Functioning One Year Later.

    Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor;Olga Kornienko;Sara Douglass Bayless;Kimberly A. Updegraff

  • Children's perceptions of the sibling relationship in middle childhood: Connections within and between family relationships

    Shirley McGUIRE;Susan M. McHALE;Kimberly Updegraff

  • Relational Aggression in Adolescents' Sibling Relationships: Links to Sibling and Parent-Adolescent Relationship Quality.

    Kimberly A. Updegraff;Shawna M. Thayer;Shawn D. Whiteman;Donna J. Denning

Frequent Co-Authors

Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor Harvard University
Susan M. McHale
Susan M. McHale Pennsylvania State University
Katharine H. Zeiders
Katharine H. Zeiders University of Arizona
Ann C. Crouter
Ann C. Crouter Pennsylvania State University
Russell B. Toomey
Russell B. Toomey University of Arizona
Carol Lynn Martin
Carol Lynn Martin Arizona State University
Laura D. Hanish
Laura D. Hanish Arizona State University
Richard A. Fabes
Richard A. Fabes Arizona State University
Corinna Jenkins Tucker
Corinna Jenkins Tucker University of New Hampshire
Gary W. Ladd
Gary W. Ladd Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career paths. Many graduates consider fields such as counseling, social work, human services, and mental health support. Online programs can provide flexibility for working professionals or those with family obligations, making it easier to gain qualifications while balancing other commitments.

One popular path is entering the social work profession, which continues to grow across the country. Each state has specific guidelines—if you are interested in practicing in Maryland, check the requirements to be a social worker in Maryland. For those considering opportunities in Massachusetts, you’ll need to understand the requirements to be a social worker in Massachusetts.

Similarly, if Michigan is your target, be sure to review the requirements to be a social worker in Michigan. For Minnesota, aspiring professionals should look into becoming a social worker in Minnesota. Understanding these requirements is essential to advancing your psychology-related career and ensuring you meet the qualifications needed in your preferred state.

Best Scientists Citing Kimberly A. Updegraff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles