World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3576 3298 2007 1809 128 11766

Mark W. Roosa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark W. Roosa between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark W. Roosa published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2009. 4 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2009. 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 14 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1982 2025

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark W. Roosa: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 3
1983 3
1984 3
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 2
1990 7
1991 2
1992 6
1993 6
1994 4
1995 3
1996 4
1997 5
1998 1
1999 1
2000 4
2001 2
2002 5
2003 2
2004 2
2005 4
2006 2
2007 3
2008 1
2009 14
2010 2
2011 6
2012 7
2013 9
2014 9
2015 1
2016 4
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 7
2024 2
2025 2
Total 143
Download as CSV

Mark W. Roosa publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Roosa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 128 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 128
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark W. Roosa D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Roosa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark W. Roosa is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and primarily works within the field of Physics and Astronomy. Their research focuses on Nuclear and High Energy Physics as well as Atomic and Molecular Physics, with additional work in Radiation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist has contributed to numerous topics that include:

  • Nuclear physics research studies
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Nuclear Physics and Applications
  • Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Astronomical and nuclear sciences

Mark W. Roosa's recent research papers demonstrate a focus on nuclear decay processes and spectroscopy, with notable publications such as:

  • Low-energy Al-23 β-delayed proton decay and Na-22 destruction in novae, 2020, Physical review. C
  • First Observation of the β3αp Decay of O-13 via β-Delayed Charged-Particle Spectroscopy, 2023, Physical Review Letters
  • Si-25 β+-decay spectroscopy, 2021, Physical review. C
  • Cluster structure of 3α+p states in N-13, 2024, Physical review. C
  • Radiative decay branching ratio of the Hoyle state, 2024, Physical review. C

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • Physical review. C
  • Physical Review Letters
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment

Collaboration has been an integral part of their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • D. P. Scriven
  • E. Koshchiy
  • C. E. Parker
  • J. Bishop
  • G. V. Rogachev

Best Publications

  • A Dispositional and Situational Assessment of Children's Coping: Testing Alternative Models of Coping

    Tim S. Ayers;Irwin N. Sandler;Stephen G. West;Mark W. Roosa

  • Agreement between Parent and Child Reports on Parental Behaviors.

    Jenn-Yunn Tein;Mark W. Roosa;Marcia Michaels

  • Examination of the Cross-cultural and Cross-language Equivalence of the Parenting Self-Agency Measure.

    Larry E. Dumka;Heather D. Stoerzinger;Kristina M. Jackson;Mark W. Roosa

  • Parenting and family socialization strategies and children's mental health: low-income Mexican-American and Euro-American mothers and children.

    Nancy E. Hill;Kevin R. Bush;Mark W. Roosa

  • Risk, Conflict, Mothers' Parenting, and Children's Adjustment in Low-Income, Mexican Immigrant, and Mexican American Families.

    Larry E. Dumka;Mark W. Roosa;Kristina M. Jackson

  • Studying Ethnic Minority and Economically Disadvantaged Populations: Methodological Challenges and Best Practices

    George P. Knight;Mark W. Roosa;Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor

  • Discrimination and adjustment for Mexican American adolescents: A prospective examination of the benefits of culturally-related values

    Cady Berkel;George P. Knight;Katharine H. Zeiders;Jenn-Yun Tein

  • Pathways from family economic conditions to adolescents' distress: Supportive parenting, stressors outside the family, and deviant peers

    Manuel Barrera Jr.;Hazel M. Prelow;Larry E. Dumka;Nancy A. Gonzales

  • Developing Linkages between Theory and Intervention in Stress and Coping Processes

    Irwin N. Sandler;Sharlene A. Wolchik;David MacKinnon;Tim S. Ayers

  • Early Puberty and Adolescent Pregnancy: The Influence of Alcohol Use

    Julianna Deardorff;Nancy A. Gonzales;F. Scott Christopher;Mark W. Roosa

  • Socialization and family correlates of mental health outcomes among Hispanic and Anglo American children: consideration of cross-ethnic scalar equivalence

    George P. Knight;Lynn M. Virdin;Mark Roosa

  • Economic Hardship, Neighborhood Context, and Parenting: Prospective Effects on Mexican–American Adolescent’s Mental Health

    Nancy A. Gonzales;Stefany Coxe;Mark W. Roosa;Rebecca M. B. White

  • A mediational model of the impact of interparental conflict on child adjustment in a multiethnic, low-income sample

    Nancy A. Gonzales;Steven C. Pitts;Nancy E. Hill;Mark W. Roosa

  • An evaluation of an adolescent pregnancy prevention program: Is "just say no" enough?

    Christopher Fs;Roosa Mw

  • The relationship between acculturation and problem behavior proneness in a Hispanic youth sample: a longitudinal mediation model.

    Khanh T. Dinh;Mark W. Roosa;Jenn-Yun Tein;Vera A. Lopez

  • Cultural and Contextual Influences on Parenting in Mexican American Families

    Rebecca M. B. White;Mark W. Roosa;Scott R. Weaver;Rajni L. Nair

  • Prevention science and neighborhood influences on low-income children's development: theoretical and methodological issues.

    Mark W. Roosa;Sarah Jones;Jenn-Yun Tein;Willa Cree

  • Recruitment and Retention of High-Risk Families into a Preventive Parent Training Intervention

    Larry E. Dumka;Camille A. Garza;Mark W. Roosa;Heather D. Stoerzinger

  • Sampling and recruitment in studies of cultural influences on adjustment: A case study with Mexican Americans.

    Mark W. Roosa;Freda F. Liu;Marisela Torres;Nancy A. Gonzales

  • History of spouse violence against mother: Correlated risks and unique effects in child mental health

    Steve Spaccarelli;Irwin N. Sandler;Mark Roosa

  • Risk status of adolescent children of problem-drinking parents.

    Mark W. Roosa;Irwin N. Sandler;Janette Beals;Jerome L. Short

Frequent Co-Authors

George P. Knight
George P. Knight Arizona State University
Jenn-Yun Tein
Jenn-Yun Tein Arizona State University
Nancy A. Gonzales
Nancy A. Gonzales Arizona State University
Katharine H. Zeiders
Katharine H. Zeiders University of Arizona
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor Harvard University
Irwin N. Sandler
Irwin N. Sandler Arizona State University
Stephen G. West
Stephen G. West Arizona State University
Kristina M. Jackson
Kristina M. Jackson Brown University
Hiram E. Fitzgerald
Hiram E. Fitzgerald Michigan State University
Kimberly A. Updegraff
Kimberly A. Updegraff Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring psychology students have a variety of online degree options and career pathways to consider across the United States. Choosing the right online program often comes down to factors like affordability, program reputation, and future job prospects. For those seeking budget-friendly choices, the cheapest psychology degrees in Utah and cheapest psychology degrees in Vermont are popular options, offering accredited programs at a lower cost.

The popularity of psychology degrees also varies by region and city, creating unique career networks and learning experiences. For example, the most popular psychology degree programs in Charlotte provide access to a diverse range of specialties and internship opportunities in North Carolina’s largest city. Likewise, students in the nation’s capital may consider the most popular psychology degree programs in Washington, D.C. to benefit from proximity to government agencies and research institutions.

Whether you choose an affordable path or a program in a vibrant metro area, an online psychology degree can open doors to a range of careers in counseling, research, education, and mental health support. Be sure to explore program flexibility, networking opportunities, and field-specific coursework when making your decision.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Roosa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles