World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
9000
World Ranking
15760
National Ranking
1236

James W. McNicol publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. McNicol sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 133 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

James W. McNicol D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. McNicol sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

James W. McNicol is affiliated with the University of Dundee in the United Kingdom. Their academic work is associated with this institution.

Currently, there are no records of recent papers, coauthors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or specific topics related to James W. McNicol's research output available from the provided data.

Similarly, no awards or distinctions have been documented for this individual within the available information.

The profile focuses solely on verified affiliations and the absence of detailed research or publication data suggests either limited publicly accessible information or a specialized, less documented research trajectory.

Best Publications

  • Alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated decay modulate expression of important regulatory genes in Arabidopsis

    Maria Kalyna;Craig G. Simpson;Naeem H. Syed;Dominika Lewandowska

  • Genome Analyses of an Aggressive and Invasive Lineage of the Irish Potato Famine Pathogen

    David E. L. Cooke;Liliana M. Cano;Sylvain Raffaele;Ruairidh A. Bain

  • The Use of Principal Components in the Analysis of Near-Infrared Spectra

    Ian A. Cowe;James W. McNicol

  • Tri-trophic interactions involving pest aphids, predatory 2-spot ladybirds and transgenic potatoes expressing snowdrop lectin for aphid resistance

    A. Nicholas E. Birch;Irene E. Geoghegan;Michael E.N. Majerus;James W. McNicol

  • Co-ordinated gene expression during phases of dormancy release in raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) buds

    Luca Mazzitelli;Robert D. Hancock;Sophie Haupt;Paul G. Walker

  • Hypervariable microsatellites provide a general source of polymorphic DNA markers for the chloroplast genome

    W. Powell;M. Morgante;C. Andre;J.W. McNicol

  • Comparison of Tuber Proteomes of Potato Varieties, Landraces, and Genetically Modified Lines

    Satu J. Lehesranta;Howard V. Davies;Louise V.T. Shepherd;Naoise Nunan

  • Spatial structure in soil chemical and microbiological properties in an upland grassland.

    K. Ritz;K. Ritz;J.W. McNicol;N. Nunan;S. Grayston

  • Links between plant and rhizoplane bacterial communities in grassland soils, characterized using molecular techniques

    Naoise Nunan;Timothy J. Daniell;Brajesh K. Singh;Artemis Papert

  • Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis of genetic variation in Moringa oleifera Lam.

    Geoffrey M. Muluvi;J. I. Sprent;N. Soranzo;J. Provan

  • Evaluating genetic relationships between indigenous coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) accessions from Sri Lanka by means of AFLP profiling

    L. Perera;J. R. Russell;J. Provan;J. W. McNicol

  • Analysis of quantitative traits in barley by the use of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms

    W Powell;W T B Thomas;E Baird;P Lawrence

  • An atlas of gene expression from seed to seed through barley development

    Arnis Druka;Gary Muehlbauer;Ilze Druka;Rico Caldo

  • Gene-pool variation in Caledonian and European Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) revealed by chloroplast simple-sequence repeats

    J. Provan;N. Soranzo;N. J. Wilson;J. W. McNicol

  • Genepool Variation in Genus Glycine Subgenus Soja Revealed by Polymorphic Nuclear and Chloroplast Microsatellites

    W. Powell;M. Morgante;J. J. Doyle;J. W. McNicol

  • The use of AFLPs to examine genetic relatedness in barley

    Roger P. Ellis;James W. McNicol;Eileen Baird;Allan Booth

  • Construction of a genetic linkage map in tetraploid species using molecular markers.

    Z W Luo;Z W Luo;C A Hackett;J E Bradshaw;J W McNicol

  • Identification of AFLP and SSR markers associated with quantitative resistance to Globodera pallida (Stone) in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum) with a view to marker-assisted selection

    J. E. Bradshaw;C. A. Hackett;R. C. Meyer;D. Milbourne

  • Chloroplast DNA variability in wild and cultivated rice (Oryza spp.) revealed by polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeats

    Jim Provan;G. Corbett;J.W. McNicol;W. Powell

  • Soil organic carbon contents in long‐term experimental grassland plots in the UK (Palace Leas and Park Grass) have not changed consistently in recent decades

    David W. Hopkins;David W. Hopkins;I. S. Waite;J. W. Mcnicol;P. R. Poulton

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard V. Davies
Howard V. Davies James Hutton Institute
Christine A. Hackett
Christine A. Hackett University of Dundee
Wayne Powell
Wayne Powell Scotland's Rural College
Derek Stewart
Derek Stewart James Hutton Institute
John W. S. Brown
John W. S. Brown James Hutton Institute
John E. Bradshaw
John E. Bradshaw James Hutton Institute
Philip J. White
Philip J. White James Hutton Institute
Naoise Nunan
Naoise Nunan Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Scott N. Johnson
Scott N. Johnson Western Sydney University
Pete E. Hedley
Pete E. Hedley James Hutton Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With a background in Biology or Biochemistry, students have various online degree options and career pathways to consider. One popular route is pursuing a cheapest online mba in healthcare management, which allows graduates to combine scientific expertise with business and leadership skills for management roles in healthcare settings.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, earning credentials as a certified coding specialist can open doors to essential positions in medical data management. If you’re curious about the earning potential, you can explore exact medical coding jobs salary figures, which vary based on experience and specialization.

It’s also important to consider the job outlook for medical billing and coding. These roles are experiencing steady growth due to the increasing demand for accurate healthcare documentation and insurance processing. Whether you’re aiming for a clinical, administrative, or leadership path, online programs make these opportunities more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing James W. McNicol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles