World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
46023
World Ranking
2100
National Ranking
1219

Nicki R. Crick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicki R. Crick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nicki R. Crick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicki R. Crick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicki R. Crick was affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. The scholar's career included contributions that did not leave a publicly documented record of frequent co-authors, recent papers, or specific publication venues, as per the available data.

There are no recorded fields or subfields of study explicitly connected to Nicki R. Crick in the current dataset. Similarly, the main topics of work, which often provide insight into the thematic focus of a scientist's research, are not documented here.

The absence of listed book publications and awards further limits detailed visibility into the scholar's broader academic and professional impact within their discipline.

Due to the data constraints, no specific titles, publication years, or venues of papers authored by Nicki R. Crick are available for inclusion.

Best Publications

  • A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment.

    Nicki R. Crick;Kenneth A. Dodge

  • Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment.

    Nicki R. Crick;Jennifer K. Grotpeter

  • Social Information‐Processing Mechanisms in Reactive and Proactive Aggression

    Nicki R. Crick;Kenneth A. Dodge

  • The Role of Overt Aggression, Relational Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior in the Prediction of Children's Future Social Adjustment

    Nicki R. Crick

  • Children's treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression

    Nicki R. Crick;Jennifer K. Grotpeter

  • Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: A multiinformant approach.

    Nicki R. Crick;Maureen A. Bigbee

  • Relational and Overt Aggression in Preschool

    Nicki R. Crick;Juan F. Casas;Monique Mosher

  • Relational aggression: The role of intent attributions, feelings of distress, and provocation type

    Nicki R. Crick

  • Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship

    Jennifer K. Grotpeter;Nicki R. Crick

  • Social Information-Processing Bases of Aggressive Behavior in Children:

    Kenneth A. Dodge;Nicki R. Crick

  • Childhood aggression and gender: a new look at an old problem.

    Nicki R. Crick;Nicole E. Werner;Juan F. Casas;Kathryn M. O'Brien

  • Engagement in Gender Normative Versus Nonnormative Forms of Aggression: Links to Social-Psychological Adjustment

    Nicki R. Crick

  • Relationally and physically aggressive children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations.

    Nicki R. Crick;Jennifer K. Grotpeter;Maureen A. Bigbee

  • The development of psychopathology in females and males: current progress and future challenges.

    Nicki R. Crick;Carolyn Zahn-Waxler

  • Gender Differences in Children's Normative Beliefs about Aggression: How Do I Hurt Thee? Let Me Count the Ways

    Nicki R. Crick;Maureen A. Bigbee;Cynthia Howes

  • Maternal and paternal parenting styles associated with relational aggression in children and adolescents: A conceptual analysis and meta-analytic review

    Yoshito Kawabata;Lenneke R.A. Alink;Wan-Ling Tseng;Marinus H. van IJzendoorn;Marinus H. van IJzendoorn

  • A longitudinal study of relational aggression, physical aggression, and children's social-psychological adjustment.

    Nicki R. Crick;Jamie M. Ostrov;Nicole E. Werner

  • Relational and Physical Forms of Peer Victimization in Preschool

    Nicki R. Crick;Juan F. Casas;Hyon-Chin Ku

  • Relational and Physical Victimization Within Friendships: Nobody Told Me There'd Be Friends Like These

    Nicki R. Crick;David A. Nelson

  • Relational aggression and social-psychological adjustment in a college sample.

    Nicole E. Werner;Nicki R. Crick

Frequent Co-Authors

Jamie M. Ostrov
Jamie M. Ostrov University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Dianna Murray-Close
Dianna Murray-Close University of Vermont
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Fred A. Rogosch
Fred A. Rogosch University of Rochester
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck Griffith University
Susan Shur-Fen Gau
Susan Shur-Fen Gau National Taiwan University
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University
Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen Radboud University
Douglas A. Gentile
Douglas A. Gentile Iowa State University
Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many students who pursue psychology go on to specialize in social work, counseling, or related roles.

Each state has specific requirements for a career in social work. For example, those interested in becoming a social worker in Pennsylvania must complete an approved degree, acquire supervised experience, and pass licensing exams. Similarly, individuals who are looking into becoming a social worker in Rhode Island need to follow a distinct licensure process.

If you plan to practice in the southeast, it's important to be familiar with the South Carolina social work license requirements, which include educational and examination commitments. Likewise, the South Dakota social work license requirements detail the steps needed for certification in that state.

Exploring related online programs and credentials can help you prepare for these varied pathways, ensuring you have the flexibility and qualifications needed for a successful career in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Nicki R. Crick

Recently Published Articles