World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
92
Citations
26614
World Ranking
2242
National Ranking
1204

Mary C. Dinauer publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Dinauer sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 267 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mary C. Dinauer D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Dinauer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Mary C. Dinauer is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of immunology and microbiology, with particular attention to immunology as a subfield and the study of immune cells in cancer.

Their recent scholarly output includes the paper titled Investigating pulmonary neutrophil responses to inflammation in mice via flow cytometry, published in 2024 in the Journal of Leukocyte Biology. This work addresses the behavior of pulmonary neutrophils in the context of inflammation, using flow cytometry techniques.

Mary C. Dinauer has collaborated frequently with several researchers, which include:

  • Zhimin Song
  • Regina A. Clemens
  • Yun Zhang
  • Jingjing Chen
  • Yaofeng Wang

The primary publication venue associated with their work is the Journal of Leukocyte Biology.

The scientist's research topics prominently feature the investigation of immune cells related to cancer, highlighting a continuing focus on immune mechanisms in oncological contexts.

Mary C. Dinauer has received recognition within the scientific community, including the distinction of being a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2014, along with membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Mouse model of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease, an inherited defect in phagocyte superoxide production

    Jonathan D. Pollock;David A. Williams;David A. Williams;Mary A.C. Gifford;Ling Lin Li

  • Functional analysis of Nox4 reveals unique characteristics compared to other NADPH oxidases

    Kendra D. Martyn;Linda M. Frederick;Katharina von Loehneysen;Mary C. Dinauer

  • Salmonella pathogenicity island 2-dependent evasion of the phagocyte NADPH oxidase.

    Andrés Vazquez-Torres;Yisheng Xu;Jessica Jones-Carson;David W. Holden

  • Phenotype of mice and macrophages deficient in both phagocyte oxidase and inducible nitric oxide synthase.

    Michael U Shiloh;John D MacMicking;Susan Nicholson;Juliet E Brause

  • Deficiency of the hematopoietic cell-specific Rho family GTPase Rac2 is characterized by abnormalities in neutrophil function and host defense.

    Andrew W. Roberts;Chaekyun Kim;Ling Zhen;John B. Lowe

  • Activation of antibacterial autophagy by NADPH oxidases

    Ju Huang;Veronica Canadien;Grace Y. Lam;Benjamin E. Steinberg

  • Absence of Respiratory Burst in X-linked Chronic Granulomatous Disease Mice Leads to Abnormalities in Both Host Defense and Inflammatory Response to Aspergillus fumigatus

    David E. Morgenstern;Mary A.C. Gifford;Ling Lin Li;Claire M. Doerschuk

  • Periplasmic superoxide dismutase protects Salmonella from products of phagocyte NADPH-oxidase and nitric oxide synthase

    Mary Ann De Groote;Urs A. Ochsner;Michael U. Shiloh;Carl Nathan

  • The glycoprotein encoded by the X-linked chronic granulomatous disease locus is a component of the neutrophil cytochrome b complex

    Mary C. Dinauer;Stuart H. Orkin;Stuart H. Orkin;Robin Brown;Robin Brown;Algirdas J. Jesaitis

  • Ischemic Stroke Injury Is Reduced in Mice Lacking a Functional NADPH Oxidase

    Claire E. Walder;Simon P. Green;Walter C. Darbonne;Joanne Mathias

  • A new genetic subgroup of chronic granulomatous disease with autosomal recessive mutations in p40phox and selective defects in neutrophil NADPH oxidase activity

    Juan D. Matute;Andres A. Arias;Nicola A. M. Wright;Iwona Wrobel

  • Human neutrophil cytochrome b light chain (p22-phox). Gene structure, chromosomal location, and mutations in cytochrome-negative autosomal recessive chronic granulomatous disease.

    M. C. Dinauer;E. A. Pierce;G. A. P. Bruns;J. T. Curnutte

  • Primary structure and unique expression of the 22-kilodalton light chain of human neutrophil cytochrome b.

    Charles A. Parkos;Mary C. Dinauer;Leslie E. Walker;Rodger A. Allen

  • Endothelial NADPH Oxidase as the Source of Oxidants in Lungs Exposed to Ischemia or High K

    Abu B. Al-Mehdi;Guochang Zhao;Chandra Dodia;Kasumi Tozawa

  • Dominant negative mutation of the hematopoietic-specific Rho GTPase, Rac2, is associated with a human phagocyte immunodeficiency

    David A. Williams;Wen Tao;Fengchun Yang;Chaekyun Kim

  • Rac1 Deletion in Mouse Neutrophils Has Selective Effects on Neutrophil Functions

    Michael Glogauer;Christophe C. Marchal;Fei Zhu;Aelaf Worku

  • Association of a Ras-related protein with cytochrome b of human neutrophils.

    Mark T. Quinn;Charles A. Parkos;Charles A. Parkos;Leslie Walker;Stuart H. Orkin;Stuart H. Orkin

  • O2 sensing is preserved in mice lacking the gp91 phox subunit of NADPH oxidase

    S. L. Archer;H. L. Reeve;E. Michelakis;L. Puttagunta

  • Gene targeting of X chromosome-linked chronic granulomatous disease locus in a human myeloid leukemia cell line and rescue by expression of recombinant gp91phox.

    Ling Zhen;Alexandra A. J. King;Yonghong Xiao;Stephen J. Chanock

  • Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 2—Dependent Evasion of the

    Yisheng Xu;Jessica Jones-Carson;David W. Holden;Scott M. Lucia

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart H. Orkin
Stuart H. Orkin Harvard University
Algirdas J. Jesaitis
Algirdas J. Jesaitis Montana State University
Ulla G. Knaus
Ulla G. Knaus University College Dublin
David A. Ingram
David A. Ingram Indiana University
Mervin C. Yoder
Mervin C. Yoder Indiana University
Akira Yamauchi
Akira Yamauchi Kawasaki Medical School
William M. Nauseef
William M. Nauseef University of Iowa
Kenneth Cornetta
Kenneth Cornetta Indiana University
Mark T. Quinn
Mark T. Quinn Montana State University
David A. Williams
David A. Williams Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Biology and Biochemistry open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, many of which require advanced or specialized education. If you are considering further study, it’s important to evaluate the cost of masters degree in nutrition, as tuition fees and financial aid options vary widely between institutions.

For those interested in healthcare diagnostics, accredited online sonography programs offer flexible pathways to become an ultrasound technician. Similarly, exploring an online rad tech programs is ideal for students interested in radiology technology, with online options making it easier to balance study and work.

Nutrition and dietetics also provide strong career prospects in clinical, community, and research settings. To stand out professionally, consider the best dietetics programs that offer both online coursework and practical experience.

Each of these online degrees supports diverse career pathways, allowing students to customize educational experiences to match personal and professional goals in the life sciences and healthcare sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Mary C. Dinauer

Trending Scientists