World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
94
Citations
33824
World Ranking
2001
National Ranking
1090

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
33776
World Ranking
10837
National Ranking
5578

Mervin C. Yoder publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mervin C. Yoder sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 451 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mervin C. Yoder D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mervin C. Yoder sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mervin C. Yoder is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and focuses their research primarily in the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work spans several specialized subfields, including molecular biology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, genetics, biomedical engineering, and cell biology.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics, particularly those related to cellular and molecular mechanisms in health and disease. Key areas of study include angiogenesis and VEGF in cancer, zebrafish biomedical research applications, mesenchymal stem cell research, 3D printing in biomedical research, pluripotent stem cells research, immune cells in cancer, and renal and related cancers.

They have contributed to several notable scientific publications. Some of their recent papers include:

  • Sox9 and Rbpj differentially regulate endothelial to mesenchymal transition and wound scarring in murine endovascular progenitors, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Origin, prospective identification, and function of circulating endothelial colony-forming cells in mice and humans, 2023, JCI Insight
  • Isolation of tissue-resident vascular endothelial stem cells from mouse liver, 2020, Nature Protocols
  • Identification of a physiologic vasculogenic fibroblast state to achieve tissue repair, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Novel Markers of Angiogenesis in the Setting of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia, 2020, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • Nature Communications
  • Molecular Therapy
  • Circulation Research
  • Cell Stem Cell
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Collaborations form an important part of their research activity. Frequent co-authors have been:

  • Chang-Hyun Gil
  • Michael P. Murphy
  • Kimihiko Banno
  • David P. Basile
  • Chandan K. Sen

Their contributions detail various aspects of endothelial biology, regenerative medicine, and vascular research through both experimental and translational approaches. The range and focus of their publications reflect an integration of molecular pathways and cellular functions relevant to tissue repair, cancer biology, and degenerative diseases.

Best Publications

  • Identification of a novel hierarchy of endothelial progenitor cells using human peripheral and umbilical cord blood.

    David A. Ingram;Laura E. Mead;Hiromi Tanaka;Virginia Meade

  • Redefining endothelial progenitor cells via clonal analysis and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell principals

    Mervin C. Yoder;Laura E. Mead;Daniel Prater;Theresa R. Krier

  • Assessing Identity, Phenotype, and Fate of Endothelial Progenitor Cells

    Karen K. Hirschi;David A. Ingram;Mervin C. Yoder

  • Vessel wall–derived endothelial cells rapidly proliferate because they contain a complete hierarchy of endothelial progenitor cells

    David A. Ingram;Laura E. Mead;Daniel B. Moore;Wayne Woodard

  • Endothelial progenitor cells: identity defined?

    Frank Timmermans;Jean Plum;Mervin C. Yöder;David A. Ingram

  • Human CD34+AC133+VEGFR-2+ cells are not endothelial progenitor cells but distinct, primitive hematopoietic progenitors

    Jamie Case;Laura E. Mead;Waylan K. Bessler;Daniel Prater

  • Growth characteristics and expansion of human umbilical cord blood and estimation of its potential for transplantation in adults.

    H E Broxmeyer;G Hangoc;S Cooper;R C Ribeiro

  • Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays

    Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska;Kari Alitalo;Elizabeth Allen;Andrey Anisimov

  • Biomechanical forces promote embryonic haematopoiesis

    Luigi Adamo;Olaia Naveiras;Olaia Naveiras;Pamela L. Wenzel;Pamela L. Wenzel;Shannon McKinney-Freeman;Shannon McKinney-Freeman

  • Unresolved questions, changing definitions, and novel paradigms for defining endothelial progenitor cells

    David A. Ingram;Noel M. Caplice;Noel M. Caplice;Mervin C. Yoder;Mervin C. Yoder

  • BMP10 is essential for maintaining cardiac growth during murine cardiogenesis.

    Hanying Chen;Shu Shi;Lourdes Acosta;Weiming Li

  • Yolk-sac hematopoiesis: The first blood cells of mouse and man

    James Palis;Mervin C Yoder

  • Characterization of Definitive Lymphohematopoietic Stem Cells in the Day 9 Murine Yolk Sac

    Mervin C Yoder;Kelly Hiatt;Parmesh Dutt;Pinku Mukherjee

  • Human Endothelial Progenitor Cells

    Mervin C. Yoder

  • Endothelial Progenitors: A Consensus Statement on Nomenclature.

    Reinhold J. Medina;Chad L. Barber;Florence Sabatier;Francoise Dignat-George

  • CD41 expression defines the onset of primitive and definitive hematopoiesis in the murine embryo

    Michael J. Ferkowicz;Mark Starr;Xiaodong Xie;Weiming Li

  • Murine embryonic stem cell differentiation is promoted by SOCS-3 and inhibited by the zinc finger transcription factor Klf4.

    Yanjun Li;Jeanette McClintick;Li Zhong;Howard J. Edenberg

  • The emergence of hematopoietic stem cells is initiated in the placental vasculature in the absence of circulation.

    Katrin E. Rhodes;Christos Gekas;Yanling Wang;Christopher T. Lux

  • Working hypothesis to redefine endothelial progenitor cells

    D. N. Prater;Jamie Case;David Ingram;Mervin Yoder

  • In vivo repopulating hematopoietic stem cells are present in the murine yolk sac at day 9.0 postcoitus

    Mervin C. Yoder;Kelly Hiatt;Pinku Mukherjee

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Ingram
David A. Ingram Indiana University
Arun Srivastava
Arun Srivastava University of Florida
Reuben Kapur
Reuben Kapur Indiana University
Hal E. Broxmeyer
Hal E. Broxmeyer Indiana University
Maria B. Grant
Maria B. Grant University of Alabama at Birmingham
Edward F. Srour
Edward F. Srour Indiana University
Steven D. Douglas
Steven D. Douglas Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Selvarangan Ponnazhagan
Selvarangan Ponnazhagan University of Alabama at Birmingham
Mary C. Dinauer
Mary C. Dinauer Washington University in St. Louis
David A. Williams
David A. Williams Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mervin C. Yoder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles