World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
16304
World Ranking
9580
National Ranking
4229

Jonathan D. Wren publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan D. Wren sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 262 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jonathan D. Wren D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan D. Wren sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan D. Wren is affiliated with the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including molecular biology, immunology, physiology, cancer research, and cell biology.

Their research explores various topics such as epigenetics and DNA methylation, microRNA in disease regulation, muscle physiology and disorders, genetics, aging and longevity in model organisms, RNA research and splicing, extracellular vesicles in disease, and RNA modifications related to cancer.

Jonathan D. Wren has published numerous scientific papers, including recent works that address aging, mitochondrial protection, vascular rejuvenation, and cancer biology. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) supplementation promotes neurovascular rejuvenation in aged mice: transcriptional footprint of SIRT1 activation, mitochondrial protection, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effects" (2020, GeroScience)
  • "Circulating anti-geronic factors from heterochonic parabionts promote vascular rejuvenation in aged mice: transcriptional footprint of mitochondrial protection, attenuation of oxidative stress, and rescue of endothelial function by young blood" (2020, GeroScience)
  • "Many chronological aging clocks can be found throughout the epigenome: Implications for quantifying biological aging" (2021, Aging Cell)
  • "Identification of susceptibility loci for Takayasu arteritis through a large multi-ancestral genome-wide association study" (2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics)
  • "Micro RNA -195 controls MICU 1 expression and tumor growth in ovarian cancer" (2020, EMBO Reports)

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers, with frequent coauthors including Constantin Georgescu, Willard M. Freeman, Cory B. Giles, Subramaniyan Bharathiraja, and Matthew S. Walters.

Jonathan D. Wren's work has been published mainly in venues such as BioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), GeroScience, The FASEB Journal, Cancer Research, and Aging Cell.

Best Publications

  • The Achilles’ heel of senescent cells: from transcriptome to senolytic drugs

    Yi-Yi Zhu;Tamara Tchkonia;Tamar Pirtskhalava;Adam C Gower

  • Identification of a novel senolytic agent, navitoclax, targeting the Bcl-2 family of anti-apoptotic factors.

    Yi Zhu;Tamara Tchkonia;Heike Fuhrmann-Stroissnigg;Haiming M. Dai

  • Variants at multiple loci implicated in both innate and adaptive immune responses are associated with Sjogren's syndrome.

    Christopher J. Lessard;Christopher J. Lessard;He Li;He Li;Indra Adrianto;John A. Ice

  • Bioimage informatics

    Hanchuan Peng;Alex Bateman;Alfonso Valencia;Jonathan D. Wren

  • Endothelial dysfunction and angiogenesis impairment in the ageing vasculature

    Zoltan Ungvari;Stefano Tarantini;Stefano Tarantini;Tamas Kiss;Tamas Kiss;Jonathan D. Wren;Jonathan D. Wren

  • Genome-wide DNA methylation study suggests epigenetic accessibility and transcriptional poising of interferon-regulated genes in naïve CD4+ T cells from lupus patients

    Patrick Coit;Matlock Jeffries;Nezam Altorok;Mikhail G. Dozmorov

  • The role of DNA methylation in epigenetics of aging.

    Archana Unnikrishnan;Willard M. Freeman;Jordan Jackson;Jonathan D. Wren

  • Knowledge discovery by automated identification and ranking of implicit relationships

    Jonathan D. Wren;Raffi Bekeredjian;Jelena A. Stewart;Ralph V. Shohet

  • Computer program products, systems and methods for information discovery and relational analyses

    Harold R. Garner;Jonathan D. Wren

  • High-density genotyping of immune-related loci identifies new SLE risk variants in individuals with Asian ancestry

    Celi Sun;Julio E. Molineros;Loren L. Looger;Xu Jie Zhou

  • The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors

    Jonathan D. Wren;Katarzyna Z. Kozak;Kathryn R. Johnson;Sara J. Deakyne

  • Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in CD4+ T cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

    Matlock A. Jeffries;Mikhail Dozmorov;Yuhong Tang;Joan T. Merrill

  • Plant virus biodiversity and ecology.

    Jonathan D Wren;Marilyn J Roossinck;Richard S Nelson;Kay Scheets

  • Caloric restriction confers persistent anti-oxidative, pro-angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory effects and promotes anti-aging miRNA expression profile in cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells of aged rats.

    Anna Csiszar;Tripti Gautam;Danuta Sosnowska;Stefano Tarantini

  • Aging Exacerbates Obesity-induced Cerebromicrovascular Rarefaction, Neurovascular Uncoupling, and Cognitive Decline in Mice

    Zsuzsanna Tucsek;Peter Toth;Stefano Tarantini;Danuta Sosnowska

  • Repeat Polymorphisms within Gene Regions: Phenotypic and Evolutionary Implications

    Jonathan D. Wren;Eva Forgacs;John W. Fondon;Alexander Pertsemlidis

  • Ska3 Is Required for Spindle Checkpoint Silencing and the Maintenance of Chromosome Cohesion in Mitosis

    John R. Daum;Jonathan D. Wren;Jeremy J. Daniel;Sushama Sivakumar

  • Epigenome profiling reveals significant DNA demethylation of interferon signature genes in lupus neutrophils

    Patrick Coit;Srilakshmi Yalavarthi;Mikhail Ognenovski;Wenpu Zhao

  • PDGFRα signaling drives adipose tissue fibrosis by targeting progenitor cell plasticity

    Tomoaki Iwayama;Cameron Steele;Longbiao Yao;Mikhail G. Dozmorov;Mikhail G. Dozmorov

  • Clustering microarray-derived gene lists through implicit literature relationships

    Mark F. Burkart;Jonathan D. Wren;Jason I. Herschkowitz;Charles M. Perou

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna Csiszar
Anna Csiszar University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Amr H. Sawalha
Amr H. Sawalha University of Pittsburgh
Zoltan Ungvari
Zoltan Ungvari University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Arlan Richardson
Arlan Richardson University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
William E. Sonntag
William E. Sonntag University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Holly Van Remmen
Holly Van Remmen Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Judith A. James
Judith A. James Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
John B. Harley
John B. Harley United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Joan T. Merrill
Joan T. Merrill Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Gary J. Gorbsky
Gary J. Gorbsky Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your knowledge in Biology and Biochemistry opens up a range of academic and professional options beyond traditional on-campus study. In particular, online programs allow students to pursue specialized fields and flexible learning schedules. For those interested in health and nutrition, an online nutrition degree offers coursework that can lead to roles in healthcare, food science, or wellness industries.

Healthcare leadership is also a growing and in-demand field. Choosing a cahme accredited mha programs ensures your Master of Health Administration is recognized and respected, while enhancing your credibility with employers. For advanced nursing professionals, a dnp program no clinical lets you further your expertise without the requirement for hands-on clinical hours.

If you envision a future in executive health administration, a best online dha programs can prepare you for high-level roles in policy, research, or hospital administration. Exploring these online degrees is a strategic way to diversify your skills and remain adaptable within the rapidly evolving life sciences and healthcare sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan D. Wren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles