World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lisa Amaya-Jackson

Lisa Amaya-Jackson

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9766 9138 5164 4714 68 6483

Lisa Amaya-Jackson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa Amaya-Jackson between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa Amaya-Jackson published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2008. 7 of the 75 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2008. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1992 2025

75 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa Amaya-Jackson: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 4
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 0
2007 2
2008 6
2009 0
2010 0
2011 2
2012 2
2013 3
2014 3
2015 0
2016 4
2017 2
2018 3
2019 1
2020 5
2021 5
2022 4
2023 3
2024 2
2025 5
Total 75
Download as CSV

Lisa Amaya-Jackson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Amaya-Jackson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 68 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 68
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa Amaya-Jackson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Amaya-Jackson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa Amaya-Jackson is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a specific emphasis on clinical psychology and general health professions. Their work spans related subfields including psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and health.

The scientist's research addresses several main topics, notably:

  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Community Health and Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Lisa Amaya-Jackson has published extensively, with a total of 16 publications in psychology-related fields. Their clinical psychology contributions amount to 15 papers, which forms a significant part of their scholarly output.

Frequent venues for their research include:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (15 publications)
  • PsycTESTS Dataset (2 publications)
  • American Psychologist (1 publication)
  • Implementation Science Communications (1 publication)
  • PEDIATRICS (1 publication)

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Lisa Amaya-Jackson include:

  • "All adverse childhood experiences are not equal: The contribution of synergy to adverse childhood experience scores." (2021), American Psychologist
  • "Improving the implementation and sustainment of evidence-based practices in community mental health organizations: a study protocol for a matched-pair cluster randomized pilot study of the Collaborative Organizational Approach to Selecting and Tailoring Implementation Strategies (COAST-IS)." (2020), Implementation Science Communications
  • "Children Exposed to Maltreatment: Assessment and the Role of Psychotropic Medication." (2020), PEDIATRICS
  • "Narrative Review: Impairing Emotional Outbursts: What They Are and What We Should Do About Them." (2022), Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Synergistic adversities and behavioral problems in traumatized children and adolescents." (2020), Child Abuse & Neglect

Lisa Amaya-Jackson collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Brooks Keeshin
  • Gabrielle A. Carlson
  • Tami D. Benton
  • Robert R. Althoff
  • Christopher Bellonci

Best Publications

  • Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Children and Adolescents Exposed to Traumatic Events

    Wendy K. Silverman;Claudio D. Ortiz;Chockalingham Viswesvaran;Barbara J. Burns

  • Children who prosper in unfavorable environments: the relationship to social capital

    Desmond K. Runyan;Wanda M. Hunter;Rebecca R. S. Socolar;Lisa Amaya-Jackson

  • Trauma‐focused cognitive‐behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in three‐through six year‐old children: a randomized clinical trial

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Carl F. Weems;Judith A. Cohen;Lisa Amaya-Jackson

  • Cognitive‐Behavioral Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder After a Single‐Incident Stressor

    John S. March;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Mary Cathryn Murray;Ann Schulte

  • Adverse behavioral and emotional outcomes from child abuse and witnessed violence

    Renee M. Johnson;Jonathan B. Kotch;Diane J. Catellier;Jane R. Winsor

  • Enhancing early attachments : theory, research, intervention, and policy

    Lisa J Berlin;Yair Ziv;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Mark T. Greenberg

  • Evidence Base Update for Psychosocial Treatments for Children and Adolescents Exposed to Traumatic Events

    Unknown

  • Pathways to PTSD, Part II: Sexually Abused Children

    Julie B. Kaplow;Kenneth A. Dodge;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Glenn N. Saxe

  • Functional Impairment and Utilization of Services Associated With Posttraumatic Stress in the Community

    Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Jonathan R. Davidson;Dana C. Hughes;Marvin Swartz

  • Posttraumatic symptomatology in children and adolescents after an industrial fire.

    John S. March;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Robert Terry;Philip Costanzo

  • All adverse childhood experiences are not equal: The contribution of synergy to adverse childhood experience scores.

    Ernestine C Briggs;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Karen T Putnam;Frank W Putnam

  • Understanding the Behavioral and Emotional Consequences of Child Abuse

    John Stirling;Lisa Amaya-Jackson

  • Child Physical and Sexual Abuse: Guidelines for Treatment

    Unknown

  • The National Child Traumatic Stress Network: Collaborating to improve the standard of care.

    Robert S. Pynoos;John A. Fairbank;Alan M. Steinberg;Lisa Amaya-Jackson

  • Links between child and adolescent trauma exposure and service use histories in a national clinic-referred sample

    Ernestine C. Briggs;John A. Fairbank;Johanna K. P. Greeson;Christopher M. Layne

  • Dissociation Predicts Later Attention Problems in Sexually Abused Children.

    Julie B. Kaplow;Erin Hall;Karestan C. Koenen;Kenneth A. Dodge

  • Use of the Breakthrough Series Collaborative to Support Broad and Sustained Use of Evidence-Based Trauma Treatment for Children in Community Practice Settings

    Lori Ebert;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Jan M. Markiewicz;Cassandra Kisiel

  • Directly Questioning Children and Adolescents About Maltreatment A Review of Survey Measures Used

    Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Rebecca R. S. Socolar;Wanda Hunter;Desmond K. Runyan

  • Feasibility and effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in preschool children: two case reports

    Michael S. Scheeringa;Alison Salloum;Ruth A. Arnberger;Carl F. Weems

  • Treatment considerations for clinicians in applying evidence-based practice to complex presentations in child trauma.

    Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Ruth R. DeRosa

  • Childhood Traumatic Grief: A Multi-Site Empirical Examination of the Construct and its Correlates

    Elissa J. Brown;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Judith Cohen;Stephanie Handel

  • Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Children and Adolescents

    Lisa Amaya-Jackson;John S. March

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernestine C. Briggs
Ernestine C. Briggs Duke University
John A. Fairbank
John A. Fairbank Duke University
John S. March
John S. March Duke University
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University
Julie B. Kaplow
Julie B. Kaplow Baylor College of Medicine
Judith A. Cohen
Judith A. Cohen Allegheny General Hospital
Desmond K. Runyan
Desmond K. Runyan University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Robert S. Pynoos
Robert S. Pynoos University of California, Los Angeles
Christopher M. Layne
Christopher M. Layne University of California, Los Angeles
Byron J. Powell
Byron J. Powell Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology students in the USA have a variety of online degree options that can pave the way to rewarding careers in mental health. Common pathways include becoming a mental health counselor, therapist, or behavioral specialist. Each state and city often has its own unique licensing and education requirements, so it's important to research the area where you plan to practice.

For example, those exploring opportunities in Chicago should familiarize themselves with the Chicago mental health counselor certification requirements. If you are looking at opportunities in California, be sure to understand how to become a mental health counselor in Chula Vista. Similarly, Ohio-based students can review important steps for how to become a mental health counselor in Cincinnati or check out the latest Cleveland mental health counselor education requirements.

Choosing an online degree with proper accreditation is crucial to meeting state requirements and advancing your career goals. Researching specific pathways and locations can help you set a clear plan for fulfilling education, practicum, and licensing needs.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Amaya-Jackson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles