World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ernestine C. Briggs

Ernestine C. Briggs

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9443 8826 5003 4558 79 6604

Ernestine C. Briggs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ernestine C. Briggs between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ernestine C. Briggs published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2014. 7 of the 85 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2014. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
1999 2025

85 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ernestine C. Briggs: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 6
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
2011 5
2012 4
2013 5
2014 14
2015 0
2016 5
2017 3
2018 4
2019 5
2020 7
2021 6
2022 3
2023 5
2024 2
2025 5
Total 85
Download as CSV

Ernestine C. Briggs publications per year - data summary

  • Ernestine C. Briggs, a Psychology scholar from Duke University, has 85 publications recorded across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1999, 2006, 2007, 2008 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 27 years in the span carry no publications at all (2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.0 per year counting only the 21 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 21 publications, 25% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2007: 9 publications (1.0 per year); 2008-2016: 36 publications (4.0 per year); 2017-2025: 40 publications (4.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ernestine C. Briggs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernestine C. Briggs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 79
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ernestine C. Briggs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Ernestine C. Briggs, a Psychology scholar from Duke University, records 79 publications - the 8th percentile of the discipline.
  • 8% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Ernestine C. Briggs, and about 92% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Ernestine C. Briggs ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ernestine C. Briggs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernestine C. Briggs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Ernestine C. Briggs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Ernestine C. Briggs, a Psychology scholar from Duke University, records 36 D-Index - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Ernestine C. Briggs, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Ernestine C. Briggs ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Ernestine C. Briggs is affiliated with Duke University in the United States, focusing extensively on research within psychology and health professions. Their work primarily addresses issues related to child abuse, trauma, and the complex interplay of social determinants affecting mental health.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Health Professions

Subfields of specialization encompass:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Key research topics covered by Ernestine C. Briggs include:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Frequent co-authors in their publications are:

  • Julián D. Ford
  • Angela M. Tunno
  • Sherika Hill
  • Briana Woods-Jaeger
  • Lilian Bravo

Their work has been published in several notable venues, including:

  • Journal of Traumatic Stress
  • Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health
  • UNC Libraries
  • American Psychologist
  • Child Maltreatment

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ernestine C. Briggs include:

  • All adverse childhood experiences are not equal: The contribution of synergy to adverse childhood experience scores. (2021, American Psychologist)
  • Addressing Systemic Racism in the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children Publications. (2023, Child Maltreatment)

Other relevant papers in the field connected to their research topics include:

  • Synergistic adversities and behavioral problems in traumatized children and adolescents. (2020, Child Abuse & Neglect)
  • Translating cultural assets research into action to mitigate adverse childhood experience-related health disparities among African American youth. (2021, American Psychologist)
  • Training psychologists to address social determinants of mental health. (2020, Training and Education in Professional Psychology)

Best Publications

  • Complex trauma and mental health in children and adolescents placed in foster care: findings from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network.

    Johanna K.P. Greeson;Ernestine C. Briggs;Cassandra L. Kisiel;Christopher M. Layne

  • Trauma histories among justice-involved youth: findings from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network

    Carly B. Dierkhising;Susan J. Ko;Briana Woods-Jaeger;Ernestine C. Briggs

  • Psychometric Properties of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index: Part I

    Alan M. Steinberg;Melissa J. Brymer;Soeun Kim;Ernestine C. Briggs

  • Unseen wounds: The contribution of psychological maltreatment to child and adolescent mental health and risk outcomes.

    Joseph Spinazzola;Hilary Hodgdon;Li-Jung Liang;Julian D. Ford

  • What's in a name? A comparison of methods for classifying predominant type of maltreatment.

    Anna S. Lau;Rebecca T. Leeb;Diana English;J. Christopher Graham

  • Evidence Base Update for Psychosocial Treatments for Children and Adolescents Exposed to Traumatic Events

    Unknown

  • DSM-V PTSD diagnostic criteria for children and adolescents: a developmental perspective and recommendations.

    Robert S. Pynoos;Alan M. Steinberg;Christopher M. Layne;Ernestine C. Briggs

  • Trauma Exposure, Psychosocial Functioning, and Treatment Needs of Youth in Residential Care: Preliminary Findings from the NCTSN Core Data Set

    Ernestine C. Briggs;Johanna K. P. Greeson;Christopher M. Layne;Christopher M. Layne;John A. Fairbank

  • Examination of a conceptual model of child neglect

    Howard Dubowitz;Rae R. Newton;Alan J. Litrownik;Terri Lewis

  • Measuring the severity of child maltreatment.

    Alan J. Litrownik;Anna Lau;Diana J. English;Ernestine Briggs

  • All adverse childhood experiences are not equal: The contribution of synergy to adverse childhood experience scores.

    Ernestine C Briggs;Lisa Amaya-Jackson;Karen T Putnam;Frank W Putnam

  • Cumulative trauma exposure and high risk behavior in adolescence: Findings from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network Core Data Set.

    Christopher M. Layne;Johanna K. P. Greeson;Sarah A. Ostrowski;Soeun Kim

  • Traumatic childhood experiences in the 21st century: broadening and building on the ACE studies with data from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network

    Johanna K. P. Greeson;Ernestine C. Briggs;Christopher M. Layne;Christopher M. Layne;Harolyn M. E. Belcher

  • The Influence of Mentoring on the Peer Relationships of Foster Youth in Relative and Nonrelative Care

    Jean E. Rhodes;Wendy L. Haight;Ernestine C. Briggs

  • Psychometric Properties of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index. Part II: Investigating Factor Structure Findings in a National Clinic-Referred Youth Sample

    Jon D. Elhai;Christopher M. Layne;Christopher M. Layne;Alan M. Steinberg;Alan M. Steinberg;Melissa J. Brymer;Melissa J. Brymer

  • Polyvictimization: latent profiles and mental health outcomes in a clinical sample of adolescents

    Zachary W. Adams;Angela Moreland;Joseph R. Cohen;Robert C. Lee

  • Links between child and adolescent trauma exposure and service use histories in a national clinic-referred sample

    Ernestine C. Briggs;John A. Fairbank;Johanna K. P. Greeson;Christopher M. Layne

  • Early Adolescent Risk Behavior Outcomes of Childhood Externalizing Behavioral Trajectories

    Richard Thompson;Jiyoung Kim Tabone;Alan J. Litrownik;Ernestine C. Briggs

  • Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Children and Adolescents

    Shannon Dorsey;Ernestine C. Briggs;Briana A. Woods

  • Toward a Definition of Neglect in Young Children

    Diana J. English;Richard Thompson;J. Christopher Graham;Ernestine C. Briggs

  • Suicidal ideation among 8-year-olds who are maltreated and at risk: findings from the LONGSCAN studies.

    Richard Thompson;Richard Thompson;Ernestine Briggs;Diana J. English;Howard Dubowitz;Howard Dubowitz

  • Treatment Needs and Approaches for Perpetrators and Victims of Trauma Trauma Exposure, Psychosocial Functioning, and Treatment Needs of Youth in Residential Care: Preliminary Findings from the NCTSN Core Data Set

    Ernestine C. Briggs;Johanna K. P. Greeson;Christopher M. Layne;John A. Fairbank

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert S. Pynoos
Robert S. Pynoos University of California, Los Angeles
Christopher M. Layne
Christopher M. Layne University of California, Los Angeles
John A. Fairbank
John A. Fairbank Duke University
Richard Thompson
Richard Thompson Juvenile Protective Association
Lisa Amaya-Jackson
Lisa Amaya-Jackson Duke University
Diana J. English
Diana J. English University of Washington
Howard Dubowitz
Howard Dubowitz University of Maryland, Baltimore
Julian D. Ford
Julian D. Ford University of Connecticut
Joseph Spinazzola
Joseph Spinazzola Justice Resource Institute
Julia S. Seng
Julia S. Seng University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up diverse online degree options and versatile career pathways, especially in the field of counseling. Many accredited programs are now offered fully online, allowing students to gain practical skills and theoretical knowledge from anywhere, without sacrificing academic quality.

When considering a counseling pathway, it's crucial to research the program’s reputation, licensure outcomes, and specializations. For those interested in Ohio, explore the best counseling program rankings in Cincinnati and top counseling degree programs in Cleveland to compare recognized options. Prospective students beyond Ohio can also review the top counseling degree programs in Georgia and the best counseling program rankings in Iowa for nationally ranked programs.

Online psychology and counseling degrees frequently lead to roles in mental health services, school counseling, or organizational consulting. Earning a recognized qualification not only supports professional growth, but also facilitates meeting state licensure requirements—an essential step for most counseling careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ernestine C. Briggs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles