World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
11286
World Ranking
4799
National Ranking
2650

Diana J. English publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana J. English sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Diana J. English D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana J. English sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diana J. English is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their academic profile centers on research activities linked to this institution.

The available data does not list recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Diana J. English. Similarly, there is no specific information on their book publications, main fields of study, subfields of study, or main topics of work.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded for this scientist. They are currently living.

Best Publications

  • Educational and employment outcomes of adults formerly placed in foster care: Results from the Northwest Foster Care Alumni Study

    Peter J. Pecora;Peter J. Pecora;Ronald C. Kessler;Kirk O'Brien;Catherine Roller White

  • Children who prosper in unfavorable environments: the relationship to social capital

    Desmond K. Runyan;Wanda M. Hunter;Rebecca R. S. Socolar;Lisa Amaya-Jackson

  • Defining maltreatment according to substantiation: distinction without a difference?

    Jon M. Hussey;Jane Marie Marshall;Diana J. English;Elizabeth Dawes Knight

  • Maltreatment's Wake: The Relationship of Maltreatment Dimensions to Child Outcomes.

    Diana J. English;Mukund P. Upadhyaya;Alan J. Litrownik;Jane M. Marshall

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences and Child Health in Early Adolescence

    Emalee G. Flaherty;Emalee G. Flaherty;Richard Thompson;Howard Dubowitz;Elizabeth M. Harvey

  • Longscan: A consortium for longitudinal studies of maltreatment and the life course of children

    Desmond Kimo Runyan;Patrick A. Curtis;Wanda M. Hunter;Maureen M. Black

  • Effect of early childhood adversity on child health.

    Emalee G. Flaherty;Richard Thompson;Alan J. Litrownik;Adrea Theodore

  • Exposure to Family Violence in Young At-Risk Children: A Longitudinal Look at the Effects of Victimization and Witnessed Physical and Psychological Aggression

    Alan J. Litrownik;Rae Newton;Wanda M. Hunter;Diana English

  • Father involvement and children's functioning at age 6 years: a multisite study.

    Howard Dubowitz;Maureen M. Black;Christine E. Cox;Mia A. Kerr

  • Importance of early neglect for childhood aggression.

    Jonathan B. Kotch;Terri Lewis;Jon M. Hussey;Diana English

  • Characteristics of Repeated Referrals to Child Protective Services in Washington State

    Diana J. English;David B. Marshall;Sherry Brummel;Matthew Orme

  • What's in a name? A comparison of methods for classifying predominant type of maltreatment.

    Anna S. Lau;Rebecca T. Leeb;Diana English;J. Christopher Graham

  • Defining Maltreatment Chronicity: Are There Differences in Child Outcomes?.

    Diana J. English;J. Christopher Graham;Alan J. Litrownik;Mark Everson

  • The extent and consequences of child maltreatment.

    Diana J. English

  • Adverse Childhood Exposures and Reported Child Health at Age 12

    Emalee G. Flaherty;Richard Thompson;Alan J. Litrownik;Adam J. Zolotor

  • Risk assessment as a practice method in child protective services.

    Diana J. English;Peter J. Pecora

  • Concordance between adolescent reports of childhood abuse and Child Protective Service determinations in an at-risk sample of young adolescents.

    Mark D. Everson;Jamie B. Smith;Jon M. Hussey;Diana English

  • Examination of a conceptual model of child neglect

    Howard Dubowitz;Rae R. Newton;Alan J. Litrownik;Terri Lewis

  • Measuring the severity of child maltreatment.

    Alan J. Litrownik;Anna Lau;Diana J. English;Ernestine Briggs

  • Effects of Enhanced Foster Care on the Long-term Physical and Mental Health of Foster Care Alumni

    Ronald C. Kessler;Peter J. Pecora;Jason Williams;Eva Hiripi

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Thompson
Richard Thompson Juvenile Protective Association
Howard Dubowitz
Howard Dubowitz University of Maryland, Baltimore
Alan J. Litrownik
Alan J. Litrownik San Diego State University
Terri L. Lewis
Terri L. Lewis McMaster University
Ernestine C. Briggs
Ernestine C. Briggs Duke University
Maureen M. Black
Maureen M. Black University of Maryland, Baltimore
Scott C. Roesch
Scott C. Roesch San Diego State University
Anna S. Lau
Anna S. Lau University of California, Los Angeles
Deborah J. Jones
Deborah J. Jones University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Li Ching Lee
Li Ching Lee Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degree options and career pathways. Many students pursue specialized graduate programs to qualify for jobs in counseling, therapy, or clinical roles. Online degrees offer flexible learning and may help accelerate your journey compared to traditional on-campus study.

Key requirements for licensure and certification can vary widely by location. For example, those interested in becoming a counselor should review the Omaha mental health counselor education requirements or research the Orlando mental health counselor certification requirements to understand local expectations. Major U.S. cities may have different regulations, as seen in the Philadelphia mental health counselor certification requirements and the specific Phoenix mental health counselor education requirements.

Understanding these standards is crucial before committing to an online program. Whether your goal is counseling, research, or another psychology-related path, thorough planning ensures a smoother journey toward a fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Diana J. English

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles