World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4797 4443 2650 2398 102 11286

Diana J. English publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diana J. English between 1975 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diana J. English published across 45 years, from 1975 to 2019, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2009. 3 of the 106 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2009. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications
1975 2019

106 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diana J. English: publications per year, 1975 to 2019
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 0
2005 11
2006 6
2007 3
2008 4
2009 18
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 3
2014 3
2015 5
2016 4
2017 2
2018 1
2019 2
Total 106
Download as CSV

Diana J. English publications per year - data summary

  • Diana J. English, a Psychology scholar from University of Washington, has 106 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1975 to 2019.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1975 and the most recent to 2019.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 18 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1975, 1995, 1997 and 2018, with 1 publication each.
  • 19 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1976, 1977, 1978, 1979 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.1 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2015-2019) hold 14 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1975-1989: 3 publications (0.2 per year); 1990-2004: 23 publications (1.5 per year); 2005-2019: 80 publications (5.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Diana J. English publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana J. English sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 102
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Diana J. English publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Diana J. English, a Psychology scholar from University of Washington, records 102 publications - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Diana J. English, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Diana J. English ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Diana J. English D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana J. English sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Diana J. English D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Diana J. English, a Psychology scholar from University of Washington, records 53 D-Index - the 59th percentile of the discipline.
  • 59% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Diana J. English, and about 41% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Diana J. English ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Diana J. English is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their academic profile centers on research activities linked to this institution.

The available data does not list recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Diana J. English. Similarly, there is no specific information on their book publications, main fields of study, subfields of study, or main topics of work.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded for this scientist. They are currently living.

Best Publications

  • Educational and employment outcomes of adults formerly placed in foster care: Results from the Northwest Foster Care Alumni Study

    Peter J. Pecora;Peter J. Pecora;Ronald C. Kessler;Kirk O'Brien;Catherine Roller White

  • Children who prosper in unfavorable environments: the relationship to social capital

    Desmond K. Runyan;Wanda M. Hunter;Rebecca R. S. Socolar;Lisa Amaya-Jackson

  • Defining maltreatment according to substantiation: distinction without a difference?

    Jon M. Hussey;Jane Marie Marshall;Diana J. English;Elizabeth Dawes Knight

  • Maltreatment's Wake: The Relationship of Maltreatment Dimensions to Child Outcomes.

    Diana J. English;Mukund P. Upadhyaya;Alan J. Litrownik;Jane M. Marshall

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences and Child Health in Early Adolescence

    Emalee G. Flaherty;Emalee G. Flaherty;Richard Thompson;Howard Dubowitz;Elizabeth M. Harvey

  • Longscan: A consortium for longitudinal studies of maltreatment and the life course of children

    Desmond Kimo Runyan;Patrick A. Curtis;Wanda M. Hunter;Maureen M. Black

  • Effect of early childhood adversity on child health.

    Emalee G. Flaherty;Richard Thompson;Alan J. Litrownik;Adrea Theodore

  • Exposure to Family Violence in Young At-Risk Children: A Longitudinal Look at the Effects of Victimization and Witnessed Physical and Psychological Aggression

    Alan J. Litrownik;Rae Newton;Wanda M. Hunter;Diana English

  • Father involvement and children's functioning at age 6 years: a multisite study.

    Howard Dubowitz;Maureen M. Black;Christine E. Cox;Mia A. Kerr

  • Importance of early neglect for childhood aggression.

    Jonathan B. Kotch;Terri Lewis;Jon M. Hussey;Diana English

  • Characteristics of Repeated Referrals to Child Protective Services in Washington State

    Diana J. English;David B. Marshall;Sherry Brummel;Matthew Orme

  • What's in a name? A comparison of methods for classifying predominant type of maltreatment.

    Anna S. Lau;Rebecca T. Leeb;Diana English;J. Christopher Graham

  • Defining Maltreatment Chronicity: Are There Differences in Child Outcomes?.

    Diana J. English;J. Christopher Graham;Alan J. Litrownik;Mark Everson

  • The extent and consequences of child maltreatment.

    Diana J. English

  • Adverse Childhood Exposures and Reported Child Health at Age 12

    Emalee G. Flaherty;Richard Thompson;Alan J. Litrownik;Adam J. Zolotor

  • Risk assessment as a practice method in child protective services.

    Diana J. English;Peter J. Pecora

  • Concordance between adolescent reports of childhood abuse and Child Protective Service determinations in an at-risk sample of young adolescents.

    Mark D. Everson;Jamie B. Smith;Jon M. Hussey;Diana English

  • Examination of a conceptual model of child neglect

    Howard Dubowitz;Rae R. Newton;Alan J. Litrownik;Terri Lewis

  • Measuring the severity of child maltreatment.

    Alan J. Litrownik;Anna Lau;Diana J. English;Ernestine Briggs

  • Effects of Enhanced Foster Care on the Long-term Physical and Mental Health of Foster Care Alumni

    Ronald C. Kessler;Peter J. Pecora;Jason Williams;Eva Hiripi

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Thompson
Richard Thompson Juvenile Protective Association
Howard Dubowitz
Howard Dubowitz University of Maryland, Baltimore
Alan J. Litrownik
Alan J. Litrownik San Diego State University
Desmond K. Runyan
Desmond K. Runyan University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Peter J. Pecora
Peter J. Pecora University of Washington
Jonathan B. Kotch
Jonathan B. Kotch University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Terri L. Lewis
Terri L. Lewis McMaster University
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Ernestine C. Briggs
Ernestine C. Briggs Duke University
Shrikant I. Bangdiwala
Shrikant I. Bangdiwala McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degree options and career pathways. Many students pursue specialized graduate programs to qualify for jobs in counseling, therapy, or clinical roles. Online degrees offer flexible learning and may help accelerate your journey compared to traditional on-campus study.

Key requirements for licensure and certification can vary widely by location. For example, those interested in becoming a counselor should review the Omaha mental health counselor education requirements or research the Orlando mental health counselor certification requirements to understand local expectations. Major U.S. cities may have different regulations, as seen in the Philadelphia mental health counselor certification requirements and the specific Phoenix mental health counselor education requirements.

Understanding these standards is crucial before committing to an online program. Whether your goal is counseling, research, or another psychology-related path, thorough planning ensures a smoother journey toward a fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Diana J. English

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles