World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 39 4088 3825 254 228 246 7088

Michael Krings publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Krings between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Krings published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2009. 6 of the 281 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2009. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1993 2026

281 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Krings: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 6
2001 5
2002 4
2003 11
2004 3
2005 13
2006 4
2007 13
2008 7
2009 24
2010 21
2011 14
2012 10
2013 12
2014 13
2015 17
2016 9
2017 15
2018 15
2019 8
2020 6
2021 11
2022 8
2023 9
2024 10
2025 5
2026 1
Total 281
Download as CSV

Michael Krings publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Krings sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 246–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 246 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46 246
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Michael Krings D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Krings sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229 39
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Genus
  • Ecology

Michael Krings mostly deals with Botany, Carboniferous, Paleontology, Herbivore and Oogonium. His Botany research includes elements of Devonian and Rhynie chert. Michael Krings has researched Carboniferous in several fields, including Microorganism, Coal ball and Paleozoic.

The Fossil Record, Geologic history and Prehistory research Michael Krings does as part of his general Paleontology study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Environmental ethics and Wonder, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His Herbivore research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Sicana odorifera, Cucurbitaceae, Insect and Palaeodictyopteroidea. His Oogonium study also includes fields such as

  • Peronosporomycetes and related Peat, Appendage and Hypha,
  • Viséan which intersects with area such as Endophyte, Lepidodendron and Fungus.

His most cited work include:

  • CONIFER POLLEN CONES FROM THE CRETACEOUS OF ARKANSAS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DIVERSITY AND REPRODUCTION IN THE CHEIROLEPIDIACEAE (36 citations)
  • Hassiella monospora gen. et sp. nov., a microfungus from the 400 million year old Rhynie chert. (36 citations)
  • Medullosa steinii sp. nov., a seed fern vine from the Upper Mississippian (35 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Paleontology, Devonian, Rhynie chert and Ecology. His research links Carboniferous with Botany. His work in the fields of Paleontology, such as Paleozoic and Permian, intersects with other areas such as Affinities.

His studies in Devonian integrate themes in fields like Plant tissue, Biodiversity, Cyanobacteria, Microbial mat and Genus. His study on Rhynie chert also encompasses disciplines like

  • Glomeromycota that connect with fields like Mantle and Mycelium,
  • Evolution of fungi which connect with Sporocarp. When carried out as part of a general Ecology research project, his work on Fossil Record, Ecosystem and Lichen is frequently linked to work in Host response, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (103.55%)
  • Paleontology (36.69%)
  • Devonian (43.79%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Botany (103.55%)
  • Devonian (43.79%)
  • Rhynie chert (46.15%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Devonian, Rhynie chert, Cyanobacteria and Paleontology. Botany is closely attributed to Microorganism in his research. His Devonian study incorporates themes from Microbial mat, Unicellular organism, Genus, Hypha and Glomeromycota.

He interconnects Chytridiomycota, Resting spore, Spore and Fossil Record in the investigation of issues within Rhynie chert. Within one scientific family, Michael Krings focuses on topics pertaining to Fungus under Spore, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Taxonomy. His research in Paleontology intersects with topics in Plant tissue and Ephemeral key.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • A microfossil resembling Merismopedia (Cyanobacteria) from the 410-million-yr-old Rhynie and Windyfield cherts – Rhyniococcus uniformis revisited (8 citations)
  • Fungal intruders of enigmatic propagule clusters occurring in microbial mats from the Lower Devonian Rhynie chert (6 citations)
  • Palaeolyngbya kerpii sp. nov., a large filamentous cyanobacterium with affinities to Oscillatoriaceae from the Lower Devonian Rhynie chert (5 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Genus
  • Ecology

His main research concerns Botany, Devonian, Cyanobacteria, Rhynie chert and Unicellular organism. His research combines Microbial mat and Botany. The Unicellular organism study combines topics in areas such as Microorganism and Substrate.

His Frond research includes themes of Polypodiales, Cretaceous, Molecular clock and Fern. His study in Trichome is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Oscillatoriales, Precambrian, Genus and Oscillatoriaceae. The various areas that Michael Krings examines in his Sporangium study include Pteridaceae and Fungus.

Best Publications

  • Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants

    Edith Taylor;Thomas Taylor;Michael Krings

  • Fungal endophytes in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: infection pathways, spatial distribution, and host responses.

    Michael Krings;Thomas N. Taylor;Hagen Hass;Hans Kerp

  • Fungi from the Rhynie chert: a view from the dark side

    T. N. Taylor;S. D. Klavins;M. Krings;E. L. Taylor

  • Perithecial ascomycetes from the 400 million year old Rhynie chert: an example of ancestral polymorphism

    Thomas N. Taylor;Hagen Hass;Hans Kerp;Michael Krings

  • In situ fossil forest from the upper Fremouw Formation (Triassic) of Antarctica: paleoenvironmental setting and paleoclimate analysis

    N.Rubén Cúneo;Edith L. Taylor;Thomas N. Taylor;Michael Krings

  • How Paleozoic Vines and Lianas Got off the Ground: On Scrambling and Climbing Carboniferous–Early Permian Pteridosperms

    Michael Krings;Hans Kerp;Thomas N. Taylor;Edith L. Taylor

  • Fossil microorganisms and land plants : Associations and interactions

    Thomas N. Taylor;Michael Krings

  • Acaulosporoid glomeromycotan spores with a germination shield from the 400-million-year-old Rhynie chert

    Nora Dotzler;Christopher Walker;Michael Krings;Michael Krings;Hagen Hass

  • Endophytic cyanobacteria in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: A scenario for the origin of a symbiosis?

    Michael Krings;Hagen Hass;Hans Kerp;Thomas N. Taylor

  • Germination shields in Scutellospora (Glomeromycota: Diversisporales, Gigasporaceae) from the 400 million-year-old Rhynie chert

    Nora Dotzler;Michael Krings;Thomas N. Taylor;Reinhard Agerer

  • The Carnian (Late Triassic) flora from Lunz in Lower Austria: Paleoecological considerations

    Christian Pott;Michael Krings;Hans Kerp

  • Morphology, Growth Habit, and Ecology of Blanzyopteris praedentata (Gothan) nov. comb., a Climbing Neuropteroid Seed Fern from the Stephanian of Central France

    Michael Krings;Hans Kerp

  • Fungal Endophytes as a Driving Force in Land Plant Evolution: Evidence from the Fossil Record

    Michael Krings;Michael Krings;Thomas N. Taylor;Nora Dotzler

  • Fossil Insect Eggs and Ovipositional Damage on Bennettitalean Leaf Cuticles from the Carnian (Upper Triassic) of Austria

    Christian Pott;Conrad C. Labandeira;Michael Krings;Hans Kerp

  • Oldest fossil basidiomycete clamp connections

    Michael Krings;Michael Krings;Nora Dotzler;Jean Galtier;Thomas N. Taylor

  • A filamentous cyanobacterium showing structured colonial growth from the Early Devonian Rhynie chert

    Michael Krings;Hans Kerp;Hagen Hass;Thomas N. Taylor

  • The Permian Peltasperm Radiation: Evidence from the Southwestern United States

    William A. DiMichele;H. Kerp;M. Krings;Dan S. Chaney

  • Revision of the Pterophyllum species (Cycadophytina: Bennettitales) in the Carnian (Late Triassic) flora from Lunz, Lower Austria

    Christian Pott;Johanna H.A. van Konijnenburg-van Cittert;Hans Kerp;Michael Krings

  • Systematics and Paleoecology of a New Peltaspermalean Seed Fern from the Triassic Polar Vegetation of Gondwana

    Benjamin Bomfleur;Edith L. Taylor;Thomas N. Taylor;Rudolph Serbet

  • Perithecial ascomycetes from the 400 million year old Rhynie chert: an example of ancestral polymorphism

    Unknown

  • Fungi and fungal interactions in the Rhynie chert: a review of the evidence, with the description of Perexiflasca tayloriana gen. et sp. nov.†.

    Michael Krings;Carla J. Harper;Carla J. Harper;Edith L. Taylor

  • Coprolites in a Middle Triassic cycad pollen cone: evidence for insect pollination in early cycads?

    Sharon D. Klavins;Derek W. Kellogg;Michael Krings;Edith L. Taylor

  • An improved method for obtaining large pteridosperm cuticles

    Michael Krings;Hans Kerp

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas N. Taylor
Thomas N. Taylor University of Kansas
Hans Kerp
Hans Kerp University of Münster
Christopher Walker
Christopher Walker Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
Jochen Heinrichs
Jochen Heinrichs Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Harald Schneider
Harald Schneider Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden
Reinhard Agerer
Reinhard Agerer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
James F. White
James F. White Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Gert Wörheide
Gert Wörheide Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Mark Brundrett
Mark Brundrett University of Western Australia
Dieter Uhl
Dieter Uhl University of Tübingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael Krings

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles