World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 73 593 547 177 160 285 20159

James F. White publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James F. White between 1961 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James F. White published across 66 years, from 1961 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2021. 17 of the 412 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2021. 1961: 1 publication 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 2 publications
1961 2026

412 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James F. White: publications per year, 1961 to 2026
Year Publications
1961 1
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 3
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 4
1986 2
1987 3
1988 3
1989 5
1990 1
1991 6
1992 3
1993 4
1994 6
1995 4
1996 3
1997 9
1998 4
1999 4
2000 8
2001 4
2002 8
2003 13
2004 3
2005 23
2006 3
2007 4
2008 7
2009 9
2010 4
2011 5
2012 9
2013 3
2014 7
2015 9
2016 10
2017 21
2018 24
2019 26
2020 31
2021 40
2022 27
2023 9
2024 16
2025 15
2026 2
Total 412
Download as CSV

James F. White publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. White sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–285 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 285 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35 285
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

James F. White D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. White sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28 73
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Fungus

James F. White mostly deals with Botany, Endophyte, Epichloë, Fungus and Ecology. His research integrates issues of Symbiosis and Phylogenetics in his study of Botany. His Endophyte study incorporates themes from Acremonium, Mutualism, Host, Poaceae and Mycelium.

His work in Epichloë tackles topics such as Acremonium coenophialum which are related to areas like Aleurone, Pith, Endophytic fungus and Staining. In Fungus, James F. White works on issues like Festuca arundinacea, which are connected to Elymus canadensis. His work is dedicated to discovering how Ecology, Biotic stress are connected with Dark septate endophyte, Life history theory, Rhizosphere and Diazotroph and other disciplines.

His most cited work include:

  • Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. (1576 citations)
  • The fungal community : its organization and role in the ecosystem (516 citations)
  • The program of androgen-responsive genes in neoplastic prostate epithelium (383 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

James F. White mainly focuses on Botany, Endophyte, Ecology, Epichloë and Clavicipitaceae. Botany is closely attributed to Host in his research. He works mostly in the field of Endophyte, limiting it down to topics relating to Festuca and, in certain cases, Lolium, as a part of the same area of interest.

His Epichloë study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Neotyphodium. As a member of one scientific family, James F. White mostly works in the field of Clavicipitaceae, focusing on Genus and, on occasion, Systematics. His study focuses on the intersection of Taxonomy and fields such as Phylogenetics with connections in the field of Phylogenetic tree and Zoology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (61.79%)
  • Endophyte (30.36%)
  • Ecology (15.36%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Botany (61.79%)
  • Endophyte (30.36%)
  • Bacteria (9.29%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Botany, Endophyte, Bacteria, Seedling and Plant use of endophytic fungi in defense are his primary areas of study. His Botany study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Ecology, Host, Nutrient and Inoculation. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Abiotic stress, Epichloë, Horticulture and Plant physiology.

His study in Epichloë is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Biomass, Clavicipitaceae and Lolium perenne. His Bacteria study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Superoxide, Shoot and Crop. James F. White has researched Plant use of endophytic fungi in defense in several fields, including Hyperaccumulator, Phytoremediation and Mycelium.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Functions, mechanisms and regulation of endophytic and epiphytic microbial communities of plants (58 citations)
  • Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. (47 citations)
  • Seed-vectored endophytic bacteria modulate development of rice seedlings (46 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Fungus

James F. White spends much of his time researching Botany, Seedling, Bacteria, Endophyte and Plant use of endophytic fungi in defense. James F. White integrates many fields, such as Botany and Phragmites, in his works. His work carried out in the field of Seedling brings together such families of science as Shoot, Inoculation, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Germination.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Pathogen and Nutrient in addition to Bacteria. His studies in Endophyte integrate themes in fields like Biotic stress and Ecology. He interconnects Phytoremediation and Mycelium in the investigation of issues within Plant use of endophytic fungi in defense.

Best Publications

  • Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles.

    R. J. Rodriguez;R. J. Rodriguez;J. F. White;A. E. Arnold;R. S. Redman

  • The fungal community : its organization and role in the ecosystem

    J. Dighton;James F. White;Peter Oudemans

  • Nomenclatural realignment of Neotyphodium species with genus Epichloë

    Adrian Leuchtmann;charles Wilson bacon;Christopher L. Schardl;James F. White

  • Review: Endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management.

    James F White;Kathryn L Kingsley;Qiuwei Zhang;Rajan Verma

  • Endophytic Bacillus spp. produce antifungal lipopeptides and induce host defence gene expression in maize.

    Surendra K. Gond;Marshall S. Bergen;Mónica S. Torres;James F. White

  • Phylogenetic evidence for an animal pathogen origin of ergot and the grass endophytes.

    JW Spatafora;GH Sung;JM Sung;NL Hywel-Jones

  • Biotechnology of Endophytic Fungi of Grasses

    Charles W. Bacon;James F. White

  • Is plant endophyte-mediated defensive mutualism the result of oxidative stress protection?

    James F. White;Mónica S. Torres

  • Widespread distribution of endophytes in the Poaceae

    J. F. Jr White

  • Improved histochemical techniques for the detection of Acremonium coenophialum in tall fescue and methods of in vitro culture of the fungus

    E.M. Clark;J.F. White;R.M. Patterson

  • Isolation and characterization of fungal inhibitors from Epichloë festucae

    Qin Yue;Christina J. Miller;James F. White;Michael D. Richardson

  • Endophyte-Mediated Suppression of Dollar Spot Disease in Fine Fescues.

    Bruce B. Clarke;James F. White;Richard H. Hurley;Mónica S. Torres

  • Light Converts Endosymbiotic Fungus to Pathogen, Influencing Seedling Survival and Niche-Space Filling of a Common Tropical Tree, Iriartea deltoidea

    Patricia Álvarez-Loayza;James F. White;Mónica S. Torres;Henrik Balslev

  • Functions, mechanisms and regulation of endophytic and epiphytic microbial communities of plants

    Charles W. Bacon;James F. White

  • Stains, Media, and Procedures for Analyzing Endophytes

    Charles W. Bacon;James F. White

  • Taxonomy, life cycle, reproduction and detection of Acremonium endophytes.

    James White;G. Morgan-Jones;A. C. Morrow

  • The Potential Application of Endophytes in Management of Stress from Drought and Salinity in Crop Plants.

    Hariom Verma;Dharmendra Kumar;Vinod Kumar;Madhuree Kumari

  • Endophyte-host associations in forage grasses. XI: A proposal concerning origin and evolution

    James F. White

  • Molecular phylogenetic relationships of nonpathogenic grass mycosymbionts and clavicipitaceous plant pathogens

    Christopher L. Schardl;Jih Shiou Liu;James F. White;Raphael A. Finkel

  • Leaf-inhabiting genera of the Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales

    M.V. Sogonov;L.A. Castlebury;A.Y. Rossman;L.C. Mejía;L.C. Mejía

  • Endophyte roles in nutrient acquisition, root system architecture development and oxidative stress tolerance

    S.K. Verma;P.K. Sahu;K. Kumar;G. Pal

  • Systematic analysis of the falcate-spored graminicolous Colletotrichum and a description of six new species from warm-season grasses.

    Jo Anne Crouch;Bruce B. Clarke;James F. White;Bradley I. Hillman

  • ENDOPHYTE-HOST ASSOCIATIONS IN FORAGE GRASSES. VIII. HETEROTHALLISM IN EPICHLOË TYPHINA

    James F. White;Thomas L. Bultman

  • Seed-vectored endophytic bacteria modulate development of rice seedlings

    S.K. Verma;K. Kingsley;I. Irizarry;M. Bergen

  • Endophyte-host associations in forage grasses. III: In vitro inhibition of fungi by Acremonium coenophialum

    James F. White;Garry T. Cole

  • Mutualistic transfer of Epichloe spermatia by Phorbia flies

    Thomas L. Bultman;James F. White;Todd I. Bowdish;Allison M. Welch

  • Indigenous endophytic seed bacteria promote seedling development and defend against fungal disease in browntop millet (Urochloa ramosa L.)

    S.K. Verma;S.K. Verma;J.F. White

  • Phoma glomerata as a mycoparasite of powdery mildew.

    Raymond F. Sullivan;James F. White

  • ENDOPHYTE-HOST ASSOCIATIONS IN GRASSES. XXII. CONIDIA FORMATION BY ACREMONIUM ENDOPHYTES ON THE PHYLLOPLANES OF AGROSTIS HIEMALIS AND POA RIGIDIFOLIA

    James F. White;Tyler I. Martin;Daniel Cabral

  • Endophytic and pathogenic fungi of developing cranberry ovaries from flower to mature fruit: diversity and succession

    Mariusz Tadych;Marshall S. Bergen;Jennifer Johnson-Cicalese;James J. Polashock

  • Evaluation of the potential role of water in spread of conidia of the Neotyphodium endophyte of Poa ampla.

    Mariusz Tadych;Marshall Bergen;Frank M. Dugan;James F. White

  • Molecular systematics of Clavicipitaceae supporting monophyly of genus Epichloe and form genus Ephelis

    Gretchen A. Kuldau;Jih Shiou Liu;Jih Shiou Liu;James F. White;Malcolm R. Siegel

  • Isolation of resveratrol from Festuca versuta and evidence for the widespread occurrence of this stilbene in the poaceae

    Richard G. Powell;Mark R. TePaske;Ronald D. Plattner;James F. White;James F. White

  • Epichloë spp. associated with grasses: new insights on life cycles, dissemination and evolution.

    Mariusz Tadych;Marshall S. Bergen;James F. White

  • ENDOPHYTE-HOST ASSOCIATIONS IN FORAGE GRASSES. IV. THE ENDOPHYTE OF FESTUCA VERSUTA

    James F. White;Garry T. Cole

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles W. Bacon
Charles W. Bacon Agricultural Research Service
John Dighton
John Dighton Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lisa A. Castlebury
Lisa A. Castlebury United States Department of Agriculture
Amy Y. Rossman
Amy Y. Rossman Agricultural Research Service
Faith C. Belanger
Faith C. Belanger Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Thomas N. Taylor
Thomas N. Taylor University of Kansas
Garry T. Cole
Garry T. Cole The University of Texas at San Antonio
Christopher L. Schardl
Christopher L. Schardl University of Kentucky
Zhibiao Nan
Zhibiao Nan Lanzhou University
Gerald F. Bills
Gerald F. Bills The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James F. White

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles