World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
61
Citations
23710
World Ranking
2129
National Ranking
765

Stanley H. Faeth publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley H. Faeth sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 147 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stanley H. Faeth D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley H. Faeth sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanley H. Faeth is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Greensboro in the United States. Their academic work is centered primarily within this institution. Although specific research papers or publications are not listed, this association provides context for their academic environment and potential research focus.

There are no detailed records of co-authors, which suggests that either collaborations have not been publicly documented or are minimal in the provided source data.

The absence of data on recent papers, including publication venues or citations, limits detailed insight into the evolving trends or impact of their scholarly contributions. Similarly, no book publications or their publishers are recorded, indicating that their contributions to academic books have either not been documented here or are limited.

Information regarding fields of study, subfields, or main research topics is not available. As a result, it is not possible to delineate specific areas of expertise or thematic concentrations in their research agenda based on the current dataset.

There are no awards or honors associated with Stanley H. Faeth in the given data, nor are there indications of passing, suggesting that they are currently active or at least living.

Best Publications

  • Global Change and the Ecology of Cities

    Nancy B. Grimm;Stanley H. Faeth;Nancy E. Golubiewski;Charles L. Redman

  • FUNGAL ENDOPHYTES: A Continuum of Interactions with Host Plants

    K. Saikkonen;S. H. Faeth;M. Helander;T. J. Sullivan

  • From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology.

    Eyal Shochat;Eyal Shochat;Paige S. Warren;Paige S. Warren;Stanley H. Faeth;Nancy E. McIntyre

  • Evolution of endophyte-plant symbioses

    Kari Saikkonen;Piippa Wäli;Marjo Helander;Stanley H. Faeth

  • Urban Biodiversity: Patterns and Mechanisms

    Stanley H. Faeth;Christofer Bang;Susanna Saari

  • Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems

    Eyal Shochat;Susannah B. Lerman;John M. Anderies;Paige S. Warren

  • Trophic Dynamics in Urban Communities

    Stanley H. Faeth;Paige S. Warren;Eyal Shochat;Wendy A. Marussich

  • Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment

    N.E. McIntyre;J. Rango;W.F. Fagan;S.H. Faeth

  • Fungal endophytes: common host plant symbionts but uncommon mutualists.

    Stanley H. Faeth;William F. Fagan

  • Are endophytic fungi defensive plant mutualists

    Stanley H. Faeth

  • Model systems in ecology: dissecting the endophyte–grass literature

    Kari Saikkonen;Päivi Lehtonen;Marjo Helander;Julia Koricheva

  • Indirect Interactions Between Temporally Separated Herbivores Mediated by the Host Plant

    Stanley H. Faeth

  • Ecology and Evolution of the Grass-Endophyte Symbiosis

    Gregory P. Cheplick;Stanley Faeth

  • Mutualistic asexual endophytes in a native grass are usually parasitic.

    Stanley H. Faeth;T. J. Sullivan

  • Effect of Vertebrate Grazing on Plant and Insect Community Structure

    Jennie L. Rambo;Stanley H. Faeth

  • Search for cell motility and angiogenesis inhibitors with potential anticancer activity: beauvericin and other constituents of two endophytic strains of Fusarium oxysporum.

    Jixun Zhan;Anna M. Burns;Manping X. Liu;Stanley H. Faeth

  • URBANIZATION AND SPIDER DIVERSITY: INFLUENCES OF HUMAN MODIFICATION OF HABITAT STRUCTURE AND PRODUCTIVITY

    E. Shochat;W. L. Stefanov;M. E. A. Whitehouse;S. H. Faeth

  • Taxonomic isolation and the accumulation of herbivorous insects: a comparison of introduced and native trees

    Edward F. Connor;Stanley H. Faeth;Daniel Simberloff;Paul A. Opler

  • Early Leaf Abscission: A Neglected Source of Mortality for Folivores

    Stanley H. Faeth;Edward F. Connor;Daniel Simberloff

  • Search for Hsp90 inhibitors with potential anticancer activity: isolation and SAR studies of radicicol and monocillin I from two plant-associated fungi of the Sonoran desert.

    Thomas J. Turbyville;E. M. Kithsiri Wijeratne;Manping X. Liu;Anna M. Burns

Frequent Co-Authors

Kari Saikkonen
Kari Saikkonen University of Turku
Marjo Helander
Marjo Helander University of Turku
Nicholas H. Oberlies
Nicholas H. Oberlies University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Daniel Simberloff
Daniel Simberloff University of Tennessee at Knoxville
A. A. Leslie Gunatilaka
A. A. Leslie Gunatilaka University of Arizona
Edward F. Connor
Edward F. Connor San Francisco State University
Thomas A. Day
Thomas A. Day Arizona State University
Xuemei Bai
Xuemei Bai Australian National University
Lowell P. Bush
Lowell P. Bush University of Kentucky
Rebecca L. McCulley
Rebecca L. McCulley University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in Ecology and Evolution may also explore healthcare or science-focused careers. The rise of online degrees makes it easier to transition into these fields or enhance your academic background. For those with a nursing background, there are various pathways to accelerate professional growth and specialty training.

Healthcare professionals can further their careers through adn to np programs online, which allow registered nurses to gain advanced clinical skills and qualify as nurse practitioners. Even if you don't have a traditional nursing degree, options such as direct entry msn programs make switching into nursing from unrelated fields more accessible than ever.

When considering online nursing programs, accreditation is vital for licensure and future employment. Compare institutions and learn about the importance of credentials, such as capella university nursing accreditation, to ensure your investment leads to recognized qualifications.

For those starting with an RN license, efficient educational tracks like rn to bsn to msn online programs can streamline progress toward leadership or specialist roles. Whether advancing in nursing or moving into new science careers, online degrees offer flexibility and multiple entry points for students inspired by Ecology, Evolution, and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley H. Faeth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles