World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
20729
World Ranking
17662
National Ranking
740

Michael Milosevic publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Milosevic sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 532 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Milosevic D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Milosevic sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Milosevic is affiliated with the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Canada, where their research focuses primarily on medicine with a concentration in radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, obstetrics and gynecology, oncology, epidemiology, and surgery. Their work covers a substantial body of research in endometrial and cervical cancer treatments, advances in oncology and radiotherapy, cervical cancer and HPV research, management of metastatic bone disease, advanced radiotherapy techniques, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, and MRI in cancer diagnosis.

Their recent notable publications include:

  • Definitive radiotherapy with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for primary vaginal cancer (2020) in The Lancet Oncology
  • Clinical Validation of Human Papilloma Virus Circulating Tumor DNA for Early Detection of Residual Disease After Chemoradiation in Cervical Cancer (2023) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Multi-institutional Prognostic Modeling in Head and Neck Cancer: Evaluating Impact and Generalizability of Deep Learning and Radiomics (2023) in Cancer Research Communications
  • The Oral CXCR4 Inhibitor X4-136 Improves Tumor Control and Reduces Toxicity in Cervical Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy (2021) in International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • A Phase II Randomized Trial of Chemoradiation with or without Metformin in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (2022) in Clinical Cancer Research

Frequent co-authors who collaborate with Milosevic include Jennifer Croke, Kathy Han, Anthony Fyles, Jelena Lukovic, and Jessica L. Conway. This reflects a collaborative research environment contributing to a diverse output of scientific publications.

Milosevic's publications have appeared predominantly in venues such as Radiotherapy and Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Brachytherapy, and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Their main areas of study encompass 130 publications in medicine, with substantial work in subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging (35 publications), obstetrics and gynecology (23 publications), oncology (21 publications), epidemiology (10 publications), and surgery (10 publications).

Their research topics reflect a strong concentration on:

  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Management of metastatic bone disease
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis

Best Publications

  • Expanding global access to radiotherapy

    Rifat Atun;David A Jaffray;David A Jaffray;David A Jaffray;Michael B Barton;Freddie Bray

  • Oxygenation predicts radiation response and survival in patients with cervix cancer

    Anthony W Fyles;Anthony W Fyles;Michael Milosevic;Michael Milosevic;Raimond Wong;Raimond Wong;Mary-Claire Kavanagh

  • Trends in the Utilization of Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer in the United States

    Kathy Han;Michael Milosevic;Anthony Fyles;Melania Pintilie

  • Tumor Hypoxia Has Independent Predictor Impact Only in Patients With Node-Negative Cervix Cancer

    A. Fyles;M. Milosevic;D. Hedley;M. Pintilie

  • Gut Microbial Metabolism Drives Transformation of Msh2-Deficient Colon Epithelial Cells

    Antoaneta Belcheva;Thergiory Irrazabal;Susan J. Robertson;Catherine Streutker

  • Randomized study of brachytherapy in the initial management of patients with malignant astrocytoma

    Normand J Laperriere;Phil M.K Leung;Stephen McKenzie;Michael Milosevic

  • Tumour genomic and microenvironmental heterogeneity for integrated prediction of 5-year biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study

    Emilie Lalonde;Emilie Lalonde;Adrian S Ishkanian;Jenna Sykes;Michael Fraser;Michael Fraser

  • Interstitial Fluid Pressure Predicts Survival in Patients with Cervix Cancer Independent of Clinical Prognostic Factors and Tumor Oxygen Measurements

    Michael Milosevic;Anthony Fyles;David Hedley;Melania Pintilie

  • Reprogramming Metabolism with Metformin Improves Tumor Oxygenation and Radiotherapy Response

    Vanessa E. Zannella;Alan Dal Pra;Alan Dal Pra;Hala Muaddi;Hala Muaddi;Trevor D. McKee

  • Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer

    Patrick Z. McVeigh;Aejaz M. Syed;Michael Milosevic;Anthony Fyles

  • Tumor Hypoxia Predicts Biochemical Failure following Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

    Michael Milosevic;Padraig Warde;Padraig Warde;Cynthia Ménard;Cynthia Ménard;Peter Chung;Peter Chung

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for localization of recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy.

    Masoom A. Haider;Peter Chung;Joan Sweet;Ants Toi

  • Vulnerabilities of radiomic signature development: The need for safeguards.

    Mattea L. Welch;Chris McIntosh;Benjamin Haibe-Kains;Michael F. Milosevic

  • Propensity score analysis of radical cystectomy versus bladder-sparing trimodal therapy in the setting of a multidisciplinary bladder cancer clinic

    Girish S Kulkarni;Thomas Hermanns;Yanliang Wei;Bimal Bhindi

  • Radiotherapy for atypical or malignant intracranial meningioma.

    M.F. Milosevic;P.J. Frost;P.J. Frost;N.J. Laperriere;N.J. Laperriere;C.S. Wong;C.S. Wong

  • Inter- and intrafractional tumor and organ movement in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: a cinematic-MRI point-of-interest study.

    Philip Chan;Robert Dinniwell;Robert Dinniwell;Masoom A. Haider;Masoom A. Haider;Young Bin Cho;Young Bin Cho

  • The clinical significance of hypoxia in human cancers.

    Neesha Dhani;Neesha Dhani;Anthony Fyles;Anthony Fyles;David Hedley;David Hedley;Michael Milosevic;Michael Milosevic

  • Adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate

    Charles Catton;Mary Gospodarowicz;Padraig Warde;Tony Panzarella

  • The human tumor microenvironment: invasive (needle) measurement of oxygen and interstitial fluid pressure

    Michael Milosevic;Michael Milosevic;Anthony Fyles;Anthony Fyles;David Hedley;David Hedley;Richard Hill;Richard Hill

  • Erratum: Gut microbial metabolism drives transformation of msh2-deficient colon epithelial cells (Cell (2014) 158 (288-299) )

    Antoaneta Belcheva;Thergiory Irrazabal;Susan J. Robertson;Catherine Streutker

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony Fyles
Anthony Fyles Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Richard P. Hill
Richard P. Hill Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Melania Pintilie
Melania Pintilie Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Robert G. Bristow
Robert G. Bristow University of Manchester
Padraig Warde
Padraig Warde Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
David A. Jaffray
David A. Jaffray The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Charles Catton
Charles Catton University of Toronto
Mary K. Gospodarowicz
Mary K. Gospodarowicz Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
David W. Hedley
David W. Hedley Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Amit M. Oza
Amit M. Oza Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring modern pathways in healthcare education reveals many flexible options for medical and allied health careers beyond the traditional MD degree. Online degrees have made advancement more accessible, especially for those seeking to build on existing qualifications or quickly enter the workforce.

Registered nurses looking to boost their credentials increasingly opt for online bachelor’s programs. For those seeking affordability, consider a cheapest rn to bsn program online to complete your degree faster and with less financial strain. Non-nursing graduates interested in advanced roles can benefit from direct entry msn programs online, which allow you to transition into nursing leadership positions even without prior nursing experience.

If you’re focused on accessible pathways, there are several easiest nursing programs to get into that streamline admissions while maintaining quality education. Alternatively, not all medical careers require direct patient care. Join the fast-growing administrative side of healthcare by training at medical billing and coding schools with financial aid, opening doors to strong job prospects with flexible study options.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Milosevic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles