World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
126
Citations
68752
World Ranking
2916
National Ranking
154

Jürgen Debus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Debus sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,631 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jürgen Debus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Debus sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jürgen Debus is affiliated with the University Hospital Heidelberg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a considerable body of work in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, radiation, oncology, and surgery.

The scientist has contributed extensively to several specialized topics, including:

  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Some of the recent publications associated with Jürgen Debus include:

  • Sarcoma classification by DNA methylation profiling, 2021, Nature Communications
  • An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection, 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • FAPI-74 PET/CT Using Either18F-AlF or Cold-Kit68Ga Labeling: Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry, and Tumor Delineation in Lung Cancer Patients, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of biodistribution and tumor uptake of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in cancer patients, 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Impact of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT Imaging on the Therapeutic Management of Primary and Recurrent Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Frequently publishing in prominent scientific journals, Jürgen Debus has a substantial number of contributions in:

  • Radiotherapy and Oncology
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Cancers
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Frontiers in Oncology

The scientist works collaboratively with several notable co-authors including:

  • Juliane Hörner-Rieber
  • Laila König
  • Amir Abdollahi
  • Klaus Herfarth
  • Sebastian Adeberg

Jürgen Debus's research spans multiple key areas that integrate clinical, imaging, and therapeutic approaches, contributing to the fields of cancer diagnosis and treatment and radiotherapy methodologies. Their scholarly work is characterized by interdisciplinary collaboration and publication in highly specialized journals focused on oncology and medical imaging techniques.

Best Publications

  • DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours

    David Capper;David Capper;David Capper;David T. W. Jones;Martin Sill;Volker Hovestadt

  • 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer

    Clemens Kratochwil;Paul Flechsig;Thomas Lindner;Labidi Abderrahim

  • Reduced treatment intensity in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.

    Andreas Engert;Annette Plütschow;Hans Theodor Eich;Andreas Lohri

  • Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer

    Ali Afshar-Oromieh;Christian M. Zechmann;Anna Malcher;Matthias Eder

  • Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine

    Michael Baumann;Mechthild Krause;Jens Overgaard;Juergen Debus

  • Development of Quinoline-Based Theranostic Ligands for the Targeting of Fibroblast Activation Protein

    Thomas Lindner;Anastasia Loktev;Anastasia Loktev;Anastasia Loktev;Annette Altmann;Annette Altmann;Frederik Giesel

  • A Tumor-Imaging Method Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts.

    Anastasia Loktev;Anastasia Loktev;Anastasia Loktev;Thomas Lindner;Walter Mier;Jürgen Debus;Jürgen Debus

  • 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Biodistribution and Preliminary Dosimetry Estimate of 2 DOTA-Containing FAP-Targeting Agents in Patients with Various Cancers.

    Frederik L. Giesel;Clemens Kratochwil;Thomas Lindner;Manfred M. Marschalek

  • Endostatin's antiangiogenic signaling network

    Amir Abdollahi;Philip Hahnfeldt;Christian Maercker;Hermann Josef Gröne

  • Carbon ion radiotherapy in Japan: an assessment of 20 years of clinical experience.

    Tadashi Kamada;Hirohiko Tsujii;Eleanor A Blakely;Jürgen Debus

  • Intensified Chemotherapy and Dose-Reduced Involved-Field Radiotherapy in Patients With Early Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 Trial

    Hans Theodor Eich;Volker Diehl;Helen Görgen;Thomas Pabst

  • Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients.

    Ali Afshar-Oromieh;Ali Afshar-Oromieh;Tim Holland-Letz;Frederik L. Giesel;Clemens Kratochwil

  • Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study.

    Philipp Kickingereder;Fabian Isensee;Irada Tursunova;Jens Petersen

  • Improvement of surgical results for pancreatic cancer.

    Werner Hartwig;Jens Werner;Dirk Jäger;Jürgen Debus

  • A New Noninvasive Approach in Breast Cancer Therapy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery

    Peter E. Huber;Juergen W. Jenne;Ralf Rastert;Ioannis Simiantonakis

  • Radiation dosimetry and first therapy results with a 124I/131I-labeled small molecule (MIP-1095) targeting PSMA for prostate cancer therapy

    Christian M Zechmann;Ali Afshar-Oromieh;Tom Armor;James B Stubbs

  • Efficacy of Fractionated Stereotactic Reirradiation in Recurrent Gliomas: Long-Term Results in 172 Patients Treated in a Single Institution

    Stephanie E. Combs;Christoph Thilmann;Lutz Edler;Jürgen Debus

  • Effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of skull-base chordomas

    Daniela Schulz-Ertner;Christian P. Karger;Alexandra Feuerhake;Anna Nikoghosyan

  • TERT Promoter Mutations and Risk of Recurrence in Meningioma

    Felix Sahm;Felix Sahm;Daniel Schrimpf;Daniel Schrimpf;Adriana Olar;Christian Koelsche;Christian Koelsche

  • Sarcoma classification by DNA methylation profiling

    Christian Koelsche;Christian Koelsche;Daniel Schrimpf;Daniel Schrimpf;Damian Stichel;Martin Sill

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephanie E. Combs
Stephanie E. Combs Technical University of Munich
Amir Abdollahi
Amir Abdollahi National Center for Tumor Diseases
Uwe Haberkorn
Uwe Haberkorn Heidelberg University
Maximilian F. Reiser
Maximilian F. Reiser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frederik L. Giesel
Frederik L. Giesel University Hospital Heidelberg
Marco Essig
Marco Essig University of Manitoba
Wolfgang Wick
Wolfgang Wick German Cancer Research Center
Claus Belka
Claus Belka Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer German Cancer Research Center
Andreas von Deimling
Andreas von Deimling Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can create diverse career pathways beyond traditional medical school. For registered nurses aiming to specialize and advance their practice, an rn to np bridge program offers a focused route to become a nurse practitioner, with flexible study formats balancing clinical and online learning.

Students interested in promoting health and wellness might consider a nutritionist online degree. This path equips graduates to counsel clients, plan healthy diets, or work in research and public health.

For those with a business mindset, the top cahme accredited mha programs deliver accredited online training in healthcare administration, preparing graduates to lead hospitals, clinics, and public health systems.

Nurses seeking to broaden their skillset without on-site clinicals may look into rn to bsn programs without clinicals. These programs streamline the path to a bachelor’s degree and open doors to leadership or specialized roles.

Ultimately, online healthcare degrees can help you tailor your medical or health career to fit your interests, schedule, and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen Debus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles