World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 126 2916 2720 154 148 1631 68752

Jürgen Debus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jürgen Debus between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jürgen Debus published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 54.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 137 publications in 2011. 67 of the 1,917 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 137. Peak 137 publications in 2011. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 34 publications 2000: 22 publications 2001: 33 publications 2002: 42 publications 2003: 51 publications 2004: 44 publications 2005: 68 publications 2006: 53 publications 2007: 53 publications 2008: 42 publications 2009: 45 publications 2010: 62 publications 2011: 137 publications 2012: 78 publications 2013: 88 publications 2014: 97 publications 2015: 78 publications 2016: 88 publications 2017: 97 publications 2018: 105 publications 2019: 113 publications 2020: 125 publications 2021: 93 publications 2022: 70 publications 2023: 64 publications 2024: 53 publications 2025: 14 publications
1991 2025

1,917 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jürgen Debus: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 6
1995 4
1996 14
1997 18
1998 21
1999 34
2000 22
2001 33
2002 42
2003 51
2004 44
2005 68
2006 53
2007 53
2008 42
2009 45
2010 62
2011 137
2012 78
2013 88
2014 97
2015 78
2016 88
2017 97
2018 105
2019 113
2020 125
2021 93
2022 70
2023 64
2024 53
2025 14
Total 1,917
Download as CSV

Jürgen Debus publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Debus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,621–1,640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,631 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11 1,631
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jürgen Debus D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Debus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252 126
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jürgen Debus is affiliated with the University Hospital Heidelberg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a considerable body of work in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, radiation, oncology, and surgery.

The scientist has contributed extensively to several specialized topics, including:

  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Some of the recent publications associated with Jürgen Debus include:

  • Sarcoma classification by DNA methylation profiling, 2021, Nature Communications
  • An R package for an integrated evaluation of statistical approaches to cancer incidence projection, 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • FAPI-74 PET/CT Using Either18F-AlF or Cold-Kit68Ga Labeling: Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry, and Tumor Delineation in Lung Cancer Patients, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine
  • Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of biodistribution and tumor uptake of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in cancer patients, 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Impact of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT Imaging on the Therapeutic Management of Primary and Recurrent Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Frequently publishing in prominent scientific journals, Jürgen Debus has a substantial number of contributions in:

  • Radiotherapy and Oncology
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Cancers
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Frontiers in Oncology

The scientist works collaboratively with several notable co-authors including:

  • Juliane Hörner-Rieber
  • Laila König
  • Amir Abdollahi
  • Klaus Herfarth
  • Sebastian Adeberg

Jürgen Debus's research spans multiple key areas that integrate clinical, imaging, and therapeutic approaches, contributing to the fields of cancer diagnosis and treatment and radiotherapy methodologies. Their scholarly work is characterized by interdisciplinary collaboration and publication in highly specialized journals focused on oncology and medical imaging techniques.

Best Publications

  • DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours

    David Capper;David Capper;David Capper;David T. W. Jones;Martin Sill;Volker Hovestadt

  • 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer

    Clemens Kratochwil;Paul Flechsig;Thomas Lindner;Labidi Abderrahim

  • Reduced treatment intensity in patients with early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.

    Andreas Engert;Annette Plütschow;Hans Theodor Eich;Andreas Lohri

  • Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer

    Ali Afshar-Oromieh;Christian M. Zechmann;Anna Malcher;Matthias Eder

  • Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine

    Michael Baumann;Mechthild Krause;Jens Overgaard;Juergen Debus

  • Development of Quinoline-Based Theranostic Ligands for the Targeting of Fibroblast Activation Protein

    Thomas Lindner;Anastasia Loktev;Anastasia Loktev;Anastasia Loktev;Annette Altmann;Annette Altmann;Frederik Giesel

  • A Tumor-Imaging Method Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts.

    Anastasia Loktev;Anastasia Loktev;Anastasia Loktev;Thomas Lindner;Walter Mier;Jürgen Debus;Jürgen Debus

  • 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Biodistribution and Preliminary Dosimetry Estimate of 2 DOTA-Containing FAP-Targeting Agents in Patients with Various Cancers.

    Frederik L. Giesel;Clemens Kratochwil;Thomas Lindner;Manfred M. Marschalek

  • Endostatin's antiangiogenic signaling network

    Amir Abdollahi;Philip Hahnfeldt;Christian Maercker;Hermann Josef Gröne

  • Carbon ion radiotherapy in Japan: an assessment of 20 years of clinical experience.

    Tadashi Kamada;Hirohiko Tsujii;Eleanor A Blakely;Jürgen Debus

  • Intensified Chemotherapy and Dose-Reduced Involved-Field Radiotherapy in Patients With Early Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group HD11 Trial

    Hans Theodor Eich;Volker Diehl;Helen Görgen;Thomas Pabst

  • Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients.

    Ali Afshar-Oromieh;Ali Afshar-Oromieh;Tim Holland-Letz;Frederik L. Giesel;Clemens Kratochwil

  • Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study.

    Philipp Kickingereder;Fabian Isensee;Irada Tursunova;Jens Petersen

  • Improvement of surgical results for pancreatic cancer.

    Werner Hartwig;Jens Werner;Dirk Jäger;Jürgen Debus

  • A New Noninvasive Approach in Breast Cancer Therapy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery

    Peter E. Huber;Juergen W. Jenne;Ralf Rastert;Ioannis Simiantonakis

  • Radiation dosimetry and first therapy results with a 124I/131I-labeled small molecule (MIP-1095) targeting PSMA for prostate cancer therapy

    Christian M Zechmann;Ali Afshar-Oromieh;Tom Armor;James B Stubbs

  • Efficacy of Fractionated Stereotactic Reirradiation in Recurrent Gliomas: Long-Term Results in 172 Patients Treated in a Single Institution

    Stephanie E. Combs;Christoph Thilmann;Lutz Edler;Jürgen Debus

  • Effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of skull-base chordomas

    Daniela Schulz-Ertner;Christian P. Karger;Alexandra Feuerhake;Anna Nikoghosyan

  • TERT Promoter Mutations and Risk of Recurrence in Meningioma

    Felix Sahm;Felix Sahm;Daniel Schrimpf;Daniel Schrimpf;Adriana Olar;Christian Koelsche;Christian Koelsche

  • Sarcoma classification by DNA methylation profiling

    Christian Koelsche;Christian Koelsche;Daniel Schrimpf;Daniel Schrimpf;Damian Stichel;Martin Sill

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephanie E. Combs
Stephanie E. Combs Technical University of Munich
Amir Abdollahi
Amir Abdollahi National Center for Tumor Diseases
Uwe Haberkorn
Uwe Haberkorn Heidelberg University
Maximilian F. Reiser
Maximilian F. Reiser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frederik L. Giesel
Frederik L. Giesel University Hospital Heidelberg
Marco Essig
Marco Essig University of Manitoba
Wolfgang Wick
Wolfgang Wick German Cancer Research Center
Claus Belka
Claus Belka Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer German Cancer Research Center
Andreas von Deimling
Andreas von Deimling Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can create diverse career pathways beyond traditional medical school. For registered nurses aiming to specialize and advance their practice, an rn to np bridge program offers a focused route to become a nurse practitioner, with flexible study formats balancing clinical and online learning.

Students interested in promoting health and wellness might consider a nutritionist online degree. This path equips graduates to counsel clients, plan healthy diets, or work in research and public health.

For those with a business mindset, the top cahme accredited mha programs deliver accredited online training in healthcare administration, preparing graduates to lead hospitals, clinics, and public health systems.

Nurses seeking to broaden their skillset without on-site clinicals may look into rn to bsn programs without clinicals. These programs streamline the path to a bachelor’s degree and open doors to leadership or specialized roles.

Ultimately, online healthcare degrees can help you tailor your medical or health career to fit your interests, schedule, and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen Debus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles