World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthias Guckenberger

Matthias Guckenberger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11321 10642 154 147 747 30516

Matthias Guckenberger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthias Guckenberger between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthias Guckenberger published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 43.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 113 publications in 2024. 115 of the 1,088 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 113. Peak 113 publications in 2024. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 11 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 50 publications 2017: 79 publications 2018: 74 publications 2019: 90 publications 2020: 88 publications 2021: 94 publications 2022: 75 publications 2023: 110 publications 2024: 113 publications 2025: 109 publications 2026: 6 publications
2002 2026

1,088 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthias Guckenberger: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 11
2007 19
2008 10
2009 16
2010 19
2011 18
2012 22
2013 17
2014 23
2015 41
2016 50
2017 79
2018 74
2019 90
2020 88
2021 94
2022 75
2023 110
2024 113
2025 109
2026 6
Total 1,088
Download as CSV

Matthias Guckenberger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Guckenberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 741–760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 747 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230 747
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthias Guckenberger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Guckenberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthias Guckenberger is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on radiotherapy and oncology. Their research spans multiple subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, radiation, oncology, and surgery. The breadth of topics covered includes advanced radiotherapy techniques, lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, medical imaging techniques and applications, brain metastases and treatment, lung cancer treatments and mutations, and prostate cancer treatment and research.

Their recent publications reflect key contributions to consensus guidelines, clinical practice standards, and innovative imaging techniques. Some of the notable papers include:

  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping (2020, Radiology)
  • Characterisation and classification of oligometastatic disease: a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendation (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • Defining oligometastatic disease from a radiation oncology perspective: An ESTRO-ASTRO consensus document (2020, Radiotherapy and Oncology)
  • EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with brain metastasis from solid tumours (2021, Annals of Oncology)
  • Internal mammary and medial supraclavicular lymph node chain irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer (EORTC 22922/10925): 15-year results of a randomised, phase 3 trial (2020, The Lancet Oncology)

Guckenberger's frequent co-authors include Nicolaus Andratschke, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang, Panagiotis Balermpas, Michael Mayinger, and Sebastian M. Christ. These collaborations have led to a substantial number of joint publications, indicating active participation in large-scale research projects and multidisciplinary teams.

The scientist's research is often disseminated in key radiotherapy and oncology journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Radiotherapy and Oncology
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Strahlentherapie und Onkologie

Overall, Matthias Guckenberger's work addresses clinical and technological challenges across oncology and medical imaging with a multidisciplinary approach. Their involvement in consensus documents and practice guidelines reflects an engagement with establishing standardized treatment criteria and improving patient care in cancer treatment.

Best Publications

  • The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping

    Alex Zwanenburg;Alex Zwanenburg;Martin Vallières;Mahmoud A. Abdalah;Hugo J. W. L. Aerts;Hugo J. W. L. Aerts

  • Stereotactic radiotherapy of primary liver cancer and hepatic metastases.

    Joern Wulf;Matthias Guckenberger;Ulrich Haedinger;Ulrich Oppitz

  • ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams : Statement from the DEGRO/DGMP working group stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery.

    Lotte Wilke;Nicolaus Andratschke;Oliver Blanck;Thomas B Brunner

  • ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on implementation and practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripherally located early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

    Matthias Guckenberger;Nicolaus Andratschke;Karin Dieckmann;Mischa S Hoogeman

  • MR-guidance in clinical reality: Current treatment challenges and future perspectives

    S. Corradini;F. Alongi;N. Andratschke;C. Belka

  • Is a single arc sufficient in volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for complex-shaped target volumes?

    Matthias Guckenberger;Anne Richter;Thomas Krieger;Juergen Wilbert

  • NKG2D-Based CAR T Cells and Radiotherapy Exert Synergistic Efficacy in Glioblastoma.

    Tobias Weiss;Michael Weller;Matthias Guckenberger;Charles L Sentman

  • Magnitude and clinical relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors: a cone-beam CT study.

    Matthias Guckenberger;Juergen Meyer;Dirk Vordermark;Kurt Baier

  • A Collaborative Analysis of Stereotactic Lung Radiotherapy Outcomes for Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Daily Online Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image-Guided Radiotherapy

    Inga Siiner Grills;Andrew J. Hope;Matthias Guckenberger;Larry L. Kestin

  • kV cone-beam CT-based IGRT: a clinical review.

    Judit Boda-Heggemann;Frank Lohr;Frederik Wenz;Michael Flentje

  • Radiographic changes after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)--can we distinguish recurrence from fibrosis? A systematic review of the literature.

    Kitty Huang;Kitty Huang;Max Dahele;Suresh Senan;Matthias Guckenberger

  • Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation

    Anne Richter;Qiaoqiao Hu;Doreen Steglich;Kurt Baier

  • Definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy

    M. Guckenberger;N. Andratschke;H. Alheit;R. Holy

  • Definition of Synchronous Oligometastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer—A Consensus Report

    Anne Marie C. Dingemans;Anne Marie C. Dingemans;Lizza E.L. Hendriks;Thierry Berghmans;Antonin Levy

  • Dose-response relationship for image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of pulmonary tumors: relevance of 4D dose calculation.

    Matthias Guckenberger;Joern Wulf;Gerd Mueller;Thomas Krieger

  • Radiotherapy in adrenocortical carcinoma

    Buelent Polat;Martin Fassnacht;Leo Pfreundner;Matthias Guckenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Arjun Sahgal
Arjun Sahgal Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Claus Belka
Claus Belka Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Dirk De Ruysscher
Dirk De Ruysscher Maastricht University
Jason P. Sheehan
Jason P. Sheehan University of Virginia
Rolf A. Stahel
Rolf A. Stahel University of Zurich
Thomas Brunner
Thomas Brunner University of Konstanz
Solange Peters
Solange Peters University Hospital of Lausanne
Ben J. Slotman
Ben J. Slotman University of Amsterdam
Reinhard Dummer
Reinhard Dummer University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in the healthcare field but looking for alternative routes beyond traditional medical studies, there are various online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. Many students pursue a healthcare administration online degree to build leadership and management skills vital for hospital or clinic operations. This pathway is ideal for those who wish to impact healthcare delivery from an organizational perspective.

For nurses aiming to expand their scope of practice, adn to fnp bridge programs allow registered nurses with an associate degree to directly transition into advanced practice roles such as family nurse practitioner. Meanwhile, nutrition and wellness careers are surging in demand—earning credentials through online nutrition degree programs can prepare you for roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, or research.

For working adults, flexibility is key. Many opt for online, CAHME-accredited programs; you can learn more about whats the best online mha program for working adults to find options that fit busy schedules. These alternative academic routes make healthcare careers more accessible and suited to diverse interests.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Guckenberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles