World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer

Heinz-Peter Schlemmer

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
26867
World Ranking
11859
National Ranking
643

Heinz-Peter Schlemmer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heinz-Peter Schlemmer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 611 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Heinz-Peter Schlemmer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heinz-Peter Schlemmer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heinz-Peter Schlemmer is affiliated with the German Cancer Research Center in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medical imaging and oncology, with a specialization in radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The main fields of study contributing to their work include:

  • Medicine

Their subfields of study are:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Oncology

The key topics in their research encompass:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
  • Investigative Radiology
  • European Radiology
  • European Journal of Radiology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with the following coauthors:

  • David Bonekamp (52 joint publications)
  • Mark E. Ladd (38 joint publications)
  • Lukas T. Rotkopf (34 joint publications)
  • Daniel Paech (33 joint publications)
  • Felix T. Kurz (31 joint publications)

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Heinz-Peter Schlemmer include:

  • "MRI-guided Radiation Therapy: An Emerging Paradigm in Adaptive Radiation Oncology" (2020), Radiology
  • "Joint Imaging Platform for Federated Clinical Data Analytics" (2020), JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
  • "Iodine contrast-to-noise ratio improvement at unit dose and contrast media volume reduction in whole-body photon-counting CT" (2020), European Journal of Radiology
  • "Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer" (2022), Radiology
  • "Digital Rectal Examination Is Not a Useful Screening Test for Prostate Cancer" (2023), European Urology Oncology

Best Publications

  • Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks.

    Fabian Isensee;Marianne Schell;Irada Pflueger;Gianluca Brugnara

  • Gadolinium Retention in the Dentate Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Is Dependent on the Class of Contrast Agent

    Alexander Radbruch;Lukas D. Weberling;Pascal J. Kieslich;Oliver Eidel

  • Simultaneous MR/PET Imaging of the Human Brain : Feasibility Study

    Heinz Peter W. Schlemmer;Bernd J. Pichler;Matthias Schmand;Ziad Burbar

  • PET/MRI: Paving the Way for the Next Generation of Clinical Multimodality Imaging Applications

    Bernd J. Pichler;Armin Kolb;Thomas Nägele;Heinz Peter Schlemmer

  • Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study.

    Philipp Kickingereder;Fabian Isensee;Irada Tursunova;Jens Petersen

  • Radiomic profiling of glioblastoma: Identifying an imaging predictor of patient survival with improved performance over established clinical and radiologic risk models

    Philipp Kickingereder;Sina Burth;Antje Wick;Michael Götz

  • Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MRI hybrid systems using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer: initial experience.

    A. Afshar-Oromieh;A. Afshar-Oromieh;U. Haberkorn;U. Haberkorn;H. P. Schlemmer;M. Fenchel

  • METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer: Practical Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Evaluations of Multiorgan Involvement in Advanced Prostate Cancer

    Anwar R. Padhani;Frederic E. Lecouvet;Nina Tunariu;Dow Mu Koh

  • Malignant melanoma S3-guideline "diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of melanoma".

    Annette Pflugfelder;Corinna Kochs;Andreas Blum;Marcus Capellaro

  • Radiogenomics of Glioblastoma: Machine Learning–based Classification of Molecular Characteristics by Using Multiparametric and Multiregional MR Imaging Features

    Philipp Kickingereder;David Bonekamp;Martha Nowosielski;Annekathrin Kratz

  • Large-scale Radiomic Profiling of Recurrent Glioblastoma Identifies an Imaging Predictor for Stratifying Anti-Angiogenic Treatment Response

    Philipp Kickingereder;Michael Götz;John Muschelli;Antje Wick

  • Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance

    Jan P. Radtke;Timur H. Kuru;Timur H. Kuru;Silvan Boxler;Celine D. Alt

  • Magnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab, 3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling efficiency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiences.

    Matthias Philipp Lichy;Beate M. Wietek;John P. Mugler;Wilhelm Horger

  • Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment

    Patrick Schelb;Simon Kohl;Jan Philipp Radtke;Jan Philipp Radtke;Manuel Wiesenfarth

  • Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-Body MRI in Myeloma: Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MY-RADS)

    Christina Messiou;Jens Hillengass;Stefan Delorme;Frédéric E. Lecouvet

  • Prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in staging of advanced malignant melanoma.

    Christina Pfannenberg;Philip Aschoff;Sandra Schanz;Susanne M. Eschmann

  • Can pre-operative contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for prostate cancer predict microvessel density in prostatectomy specimens?

    Heinz Peter Schlemmer;Heinz Peter Schlemmer;Jonas Merkle;Rainer Grobholz;Tim Jaeger

  • MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies.

    Aristotelis G. Anastasiadis;Matthias P. Lichy;Udo Nagele;Markus A. Kuczyk

  • Performance of today’s dual energy CT and future multi energy CT in virtual non-contrast imaging and in iodine quantification: A simulation study

    Sebastian Faby;Stefan Kuchenbecker;Stefan Sawall;David Simons

  • Proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy.

    Heinz–Peter Schlemmer;Peter Bachert;Klaus K. Herfarth;Ivan Zuna

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Bendszus
Martin Bendszus University Hospital Heidelberg
Wolfgang Wick
Wolfgang Wick German Cancer Research Center
Claus D. Claussen
Claus D. Claussen University of Tübingen
Mark E. Ladd
Mark E. Ladd German Cancer Research Center
Klaus H. Maier-Hein
Klaus H. Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
Sabine Heiland
Sabine Heiland University Hospital Heidelberg
Jürgen Debus
Jürgen Debus University Hospital Heidelberg
Fritz Schick
Fritz Schick University of Tübingen
Uwe Haberkorn
Uwe Haberkorn Heidelberg University
Albrecht Stenzinger
Albrecht Stenzinger Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your healthcare education or exploring alternative pathways to a career in medicine? A variety of accredited online degrees offer flexibility and specialized knowledge for aspiring health professionals.

For those passionate about wellness and preventive care, an online nutritionist degree can provide a foundation in human nutrition, dietetics, and health counseling. This path is ideal for students seeking roles in health education, research, or clinical nutrition settings.

If you're aiming for leadership in healthcare organizations, a cahme-accredited online mha programs option helps you gain essential management skills. MHA graduates often pursue roles in hospital administration, public health, or healthcare consulting.

Registered nurses looking to level up without additional in-person requirements can benefit from an rn to bsn online no clinicals program. This makes it easier for working nurses to grow professionally and broaden their clinical knowledge.

Advanced nurses seeking to lead in healthcare delivery might consider the shortest online dnp program. These programs offer an accelerated pathway to the highest level of clinical nursing practice, focusing on evidence-based care, leadership, and policy.

Best Scientists Citing Heinz-Peter Schlemmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles