World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
18952
World Ranking
2207
National Ranking
197

Sabine Heiland publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabine Heiland sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 399 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sabine Heiland D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabine Heiland sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Brain tumour cells interconnect to a functional and resistant network

    Matthias Osswald;Matthias Osswald;Erik Jung;Erik Jung;Felix Sahm;Felix Sahm;Gergely Solecki;Gergely Solecki

  • Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks.

    Fabian Isensee;Marianne Schell;Irada Pflueger;Gianluca Brugnara

  • Stroke Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Accurate in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Study on the Validity of Stroke Imaging

    Jochen B. Fiebach;Peter D. Schellinger;Achim Gass;Thomas Kucinski

  • Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study.

    Philipp Kickingereder;Fabian Isensee;Irada Tursunova;Jens Petersen

  • Comparison of Perfusion Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Angiography Source Images With Perfusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Acute Stroke of Less Than 6 Hours’ Duration

    Peter Schramm;Peter D. Schellinger;Ernst Klotz;Kai Kallenberg

  • Comparison of CT and CT Angiography Source Images With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Acute Stroke Within 6 Hours After Onset

    Peter Schramm;Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Sabine Heiland

  • Stroke magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours after onset of hyperacute cerebral ischemia

    Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Olav Jansen;Peter A. Ringleb

  • Monitoring Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Diffusion and Perfusion MRI

    Peter D. Schellinger;Olav Jansen;Jochen B. Fiebach;Sabine Heiland

  • Decompressive Craniectomy for Cerebral Infarction An Experimental Study in Rats

    Michael Forsting;Wolfgang Reith;Wolf-Rüdiger Schäbitz;Sabine Heiland

  • Glioma imaging in Europe : A survey of 220 centres and recommendations for best clinical practice

    S. C. Thust;S. C. Thust;S. Heiland;A. Falini;Hans R Jäger;Hans R Jäger

  • Tryptophan metabolism drives dynamic immunosuppressive myeloid states in IDH-mutant gliomas

    Mirco Friedrich;Mirco Friedrich;Roman Sankowski;Lukas Bunse;Lukas Bunse;Michael Kilian;Michael Kilian

  • Neuroprotection by hyperbaric oxygenation after experimental focal cerebral ischemia monitored by MRI.

    Wolf-Ruediger Schäbitz;Holger Schade;Sabine Heiland;Rainer Kollmar

  • Quantitative susceptibility mapping differentiates between blood depositions and calcifications in patients with glioblastoma.

    Andreas Deistung;Ferdinand Schweser;Benedikt Wiestler;Mario Abello

  • Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: MR neurography--nerve T2 signal increase and caliber.

    Philipp Bäumer;Thomas Dombert;Frank Staub;Thorsten Kaestel

  • Minocycline and hypothermia for reperfusion injury after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat: effects on BBB breakdown and MMP expression in the acute and subacute phase.

    Simon Nagel;Ying Su;Ying Su;Solveig Horstmann;Sabine Heiland

  • Delayed Neuroprotective Effect of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I After Experimental Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia Monitored With MRI

    Wolf-R. Schäbitz;Tobias T. Hoffmann;Sabine Heiland;Rainer Kollmar

  • Tweety-Homolog 1 Drives Brain Colonization of Gliomas.

    Erik Jung;Matthias Osswald;Jonas Blaes;Benedikt Wiestler

  • Multimodal Predictive Modeling of Endovascular Treatment Outcome for Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Machine-Learning.

    Gianluca Brugnara;Ulf Neuberger;Mustafa A. Mahmutoglu;Martha Foltyn

  • Differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioma in humans using localised proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy

    Inga Harting;Marius Hartmann;Gregor Jost;Clemens Sommer

  • Targeting Self-Renewal in High-Grade Brain Tumors Leads to Loss of Brain Tumor Stem Cells and Prolonged Survival

    Zhe Zhu;Muhammad Amir Khan;Markus Weiler;Jonas Blaes

  • Neuroprotective effect of delayed moderate hypothermia after focal cerebral ischemia: an MRI study.

    R. Kollmar;W.R. Schäbitz;S. Heiland;D. Georgiadis

  • Response to Letter by Moll Regarding Article, “Hemostatic Therapy in Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage Associated With the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran”

    Wei Zhou;Roland Veltkamp;Sönke Schwarting;Sergio Illanes

  • Hyperbaric oxygen reduces blood-brain barrier damage and edema after transient focal cerebral ischemia

    Roland Veltkamp;Li Sun;Dirk A Siebing;Katja Bieber

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Bendszus
Martin Bendszus University Hospital Heidelberg
Wolfgang Wick
Wolfgang Wick German Cancer Research Center
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer German Cancer Research Center
Felix Sahm
Felix Sahm University Hospital Heidelberg
Andreas von Deimling
Andreas von Deimling Heidelberg University
Jürgen Debus
Jürgen Debus University Hospital Heidelberg
Klaus H. Maier-Hein
Klaus H. Maier-Hein German Cancer Research Center
Peter P. Nawroth
Peter P. Nawroth Heidelberg University
Christoph Stippich
Christoph Stippich University of Zurich
Michael Forsting
Michael Forsting University of Duisburg-Essen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, there are several online degree options and career pathways that can complement or expand your expertise. Many students pursue affordable psychology doctorates, and programs like the cheapest psyd programs offer rigorous clinical training at lower tuition rates—a practical route for those aiming to work as psychologists or counselors.

For those focused on therapeutic careers, there are marriage and family therapy programs online which can prepare you to support mental health in families and relationships. If you’re eager to fast-track your education, accelerated programs online allow you to earn a bachelor’s degree in less time—perfect for working adults or career changers.

Lastly, it’s helpful to consider your career goals when choosing a degree. Researching what bachelors degree should i get can help you identify high-paying fields and align your studies with in-demand specialties. Each of these pathways can be a valuable next step for anyone fascinated by the brain and behavior.

Best Scientists Citing Sabine Heiland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles