World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter D. Schellinger

Peter D. Schellinger

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
29494
World Ranking
14512
National Ranking
770

Neuroscience

D-Index
85
Citations
29445
World Ranking
1323
National Ranking
115

Peter D. Schellinger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Schellinger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 362 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter D. Schellinger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Schellinger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter D. Schellinger is affiliated with Ruhr University Bochum in Germany. Their research primarily lies within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on epidemiology, neurology, rehabilitation, internal medicine, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist's contributions concentrate predominantly on topics related to acute ischemic stroke management, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, and intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data (2020, The Lancet)
  • Maintaining stroke care in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from an international survey of stroke professionals and practice recommendations from the European Stroke Organisation (2020, European Stroke Journal)
  • Neurological manifestations and implications of COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders)
  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO)-European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) expedited recommendation on indication for intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (2022, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery)
  • European Stroke Organisation - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy expedited recommendation on indication for intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (2022, European Stroke Journal)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter D. Schellinger include:

  • Götz Thomalla
  • Georgios Tsivgoulis
  • Klaus Gröschel
  • Sven Poli
  • Timo Uphaus

Publications have appeared most often in the following venues:

  • Stroke
  • Neurological Research and Practice
  • European Stroke Journal
  • Neurology
  • Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008

    Peter A. Ringleb;Marie Germaine Bousser;Gary Ford;Philip Bath

  • Dabigatran for Prevention of Stroke after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

    Hans Christoph Diener;Ralph L. Sacco;J. Donald Easton;Christopher B. Granger

  • Recombinant Human Erythropoietin in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Hannelore Ehrenreich;Karin Weissenborn;Hilmar Prange;Dietmar Schneider

  • CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke

    J.B. Fiebach;P.D. Schellinger;O. Jansen;M. Meyer

  • Anticoagulant reversal, blood pressure levels, and anticoagulant resumption in patients with anticoagulation-related intracerebral hemorrhage.

    Joji B. Kuramatsu;Stefan T. Gerner;Peter D. Schellinger;Jörg Glahn

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO)- European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke

    Guillaume Turc;Pervinder Bhogal;Urs Fischer;Pooja Khatri

  • Feasibility and Safety of Moderate Hypothermia After Massive Hemispheric Infarction

    Stefan Schwab;Dimitrios Georgiadis;Jörg Berrouschot;Peter D. Schellinger

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO) – European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic StrokeEndorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE):

    Guillaume Turc;Pervinder Bhogal;Urs Fischer;Pooja Khatri

  • Stroke Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Accurate in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Study on the Validity of Stroke Imaging

    Jochen B. Fiebach;Peter D. Schellinger;Achim Gass;Thomas Kucinski

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • A Standardized MRI Stroke Protocol: Comparison with CT in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Peter D. Schellinger;Olav Jansen;Jochen B. Fiebach;Werner Hacke

  • Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis on MRI Parameters and Functional Outcome in Acute Stroke <6 Hours

    J. Röther;P.D. Schellinger;A. Gass;M. Siebler

  • Hematoma Growth and Outcome in Treated Neurocritical Care Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage Related to Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Comparison of Acute Treatment Strategies Using Vitamin K, Fresh Frozen Plasma, and Prothrombin Complex Concentrates

    Hagen B. Huttner;Peter D. Schellinger;Marius Hartmann;Martin Köhrmann

  • Imaging-based decision making in thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: present status.

    Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Werner Hacke

  • Evidence-based guideline: The role of diffusion and perfusion MRI for the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    P. D. Schellinger;P. D. Schellinger;Robert 'Nick' Bryan;L. R. Caplan;J. A. Detre

  • Transient Ischemic Attacks Before Ischemic Stroke: Preconditioning the Human Brain? A Multicenter Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Susanne Wegener;Barbara Gottschalk;Verica Jovanovic;René Knab

  • Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap II

    Max Wintermark;Gregory W. Albers;Andrei V. Alexandrov;Jeffry R. Alger

  • Diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared to CCT in patients with brain metastases

    Peter D. Schellinger;Hans M. Meinck;Armin Thron

  • Comparison of Perfusion Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Angiography Source Images With Perfusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Acute Stroke of Less Than 6 Hours’ Duration

    Peter Schramm;Peter D. Schellinger;Ernst Klotz;Kai Kallenberg

  • MRI-Based and CT-Based Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Stroke Within and Beyond Established Time Windows: An Analysis of 1210 Patients

    Peter D. Schellinger;Götz Thomalla;Jens Fiehler;Martin Köhrmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Jochen B. Fiebach
Jochen B. Fiebach Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Georgios Tsivgoulis
Georgios Tsivgoulis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Werner Hacke
Werner Hacke Heidelberg University
Stefan Schwab
Stefan Schwab University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Peter A. Ringleb
Peter A. Ringleb University Hospital Heidelberg
Joachim Röther
Joachim Röther Asklepios Klinik Altona
Valeria Caso
Valeria Caso University of Perugia
Thorsten Steiner
Thorsten Steiner University Hospital Heidelberg
Carlos A. Molina
Carlos A. Molina Montclair State University
Olav Jansen
Olav Jansen Kiel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees that can open doors to a wide range of career pathways. Exploring advanced mental health professions, you may want to consider completing an online psyd program. These doctoral degrees are designed for those seeking clinical roles in psychology, which often complement neuroscience knowledge.

For those focused on therapy and counseling, another valuable route is the online lmft program, which prepares graduates to become licensed marriage and family therapists. This pathway frequently intersects with neuropsychology and counseling research.

If you’d like to move quickly through your studies, you can investigate online accelerated programs. These options enable you to earn your bachelor’s degree faster so you can begin your career sooner or advance to graduate study.

Finally, exploring the best bachelor degrees can help you make informed decisions about your educational investments. Many high-paying fields—such as biomedical engineering or computer science—overlap with neuroscience concepts and skills, broadening your options after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Peter D. Schellinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles