World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Olav Jansen

Olav Jansen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 90 12076 11361 654 630 515 35704

Olav Jansen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Olav Jansen between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Olav Jansen published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 24.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 79 publications in 2007. 40 of the 773 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 79. Peak 79 publications in 2007. 1995: 5 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 79 publications 2008: 38 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 33 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 67 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 39 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

773 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Olav Jansen: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 5
1996 12
1997 3
1998 11
1999 12
2000 6
2001 10
2002 10
2003 6
2004 11
2005 13
2006 11
2007 79
2008 38
2009 23
2010 20
2011 33
2012 17
2013 28
2014 67
2015 27
2016 31
2017 37
2018 22
2019 24
2020 27
2021 42
2022 30
2023 42
2024 36
2025 39
2026 1
Total 773
Download as CSV

Olav Jansen publications per year - data summary

  • Olav Jansen, a Medicine scholar from Kiel University, has 773 publications recorded across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 79 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2026, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 24.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 24.2 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 148 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 99 publications (9.0 per year); 2006-2016: 374 publications (34.0 per year); 2017-2026: 300 publications (30.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Olav Jansen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olav Jansen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 515 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 515
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Olav Jansen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Olav Jansen, a Medicine scholar from Kiel University, records 515 publications - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Olav Jansen, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Olav Jansen ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Olav Jansen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olav Jansen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 90
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Olav Jansen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Olav Jansen, a Medicine scholar from Kiel University, records 90 D-Index - the 41st percentile of the discipline.
  • 41% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Olav Jansen, and about 59% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Olav Jansen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Olav Jansen is affiliated with Kiel University in Germany and has a substantial research output primarily within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, and Biomedical Engineering. Their work spans across clinical and imaging studies related to cerebrovascular conditions and advanced diagnostic techniques.

Jansen's research covers several specialized topics, including:

  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

Their frequent publication venues show an emphasis on neuroradiology and imaging research, including:

  • Neuroradiologie Scan
  • RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Scientific Reports
  • Interventional Neuroradiology

Collaboration is a notable part of Jansen's research career, indicated by frequent coauthors such as:

  • Naomi Larsen
  • Fritz Wodarg
  • Jan-Bernd Hövener
  • Patrick Langguth
  • Mona Salehi Ravesh

Representative recent publications from Olav Jansen include:

  • Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients with stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised non-inferiority trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • Carotid endarterectomy or stenting or best medical treatment alone for moderate-to-severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: 5-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • The Safety and Effectiveness of the Contour Neurovascular System (Contour) for the Treatment of Bifurcation Aneurysms: The CERUS Study, 2021, Neurosurgery
  • Multimodal validation of focal enhancement in intracranial aneurysms as a surrogate marker for aneurysm instability, 2020, Neuroradiology
  • Recanalization after cerebral venous thrombosis. A randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate versus dose-adjusted warfarin in patients with cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis, 2021, International Journal of Stroke

Best Publications

  • Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Alain Bonafe;Hans Christoph Diener

  • 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

    Ringleb Pa;Allenberg J;Brückmann H

  • Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

    Unknown

  • Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial.

    Hans-Henning Eckstein;Peter Ringleb;Jens-Rainer Allenberg;Jürgen Berger

  • Early Hemicraniectomy in Patients With Complete Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction

    S. Schwab;T. Steiner;A. Aschoff;S. Schwarz

  • The Importance of Size Successful Recanalization by Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Anterior Stroke Depends on Thrombus Length

    Christian H. Riedel;Philip Zimmermann;Ulf Jensen-Kondering;Robert Stingele

  • CT and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Randomized Order Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Results in Higher Accuracy and Lower Interrater Variability in the Diagnosis of Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke

    J.B. Fiebach;P.D. Schellinger;O. Jansen;M. Meyer

  • Manganese and chronic hepatic encephalopathy.

    D Krieger;S Krieger;L Theilmann;O Jansen

  • Stroke Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Accurate in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Study on the Validity of Stroke Imaging

    Jochen B. Fiebach;Peter D. Schellinger;Achim Gass;Thomas Kucinski

  • A Standardized MRI Stroke Protocol: Comparison with CT in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Peter D. Schellinger;Olav Jansen;Jochen B. Fiebach;Werner Hacke

  • Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis on MRI Parameters and Functional Outcome in Acute Stroke <6 Hours

    J. Röther;P.D. Schellinger;A. Gass;M. Siebler

  • Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: Consensus statement by ESO-Karolinska Stroke Update 2014/2015, supported by ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN:

    Nils Wahlgren;Tiago Moreira;Patrik Michel;Thorsten Steiner

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • CA1 neurons in the human hippocampus are critical for autobiographical memory, mental time travel, and autonoetic consciousness

    Thorsten Bartsch;Juliane Döhring;Axel Rohr;Olav Jansen

  • Thrombolytic therapy in acute occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery bifurcation.

    O Jansen;R von Kummer;M Forsting;W Hacke

  • Induction of empathy by the smell of anxiety.

    Alexander Prehn-Kristensen;Christian Wiesner;Til Ole Bergmann;Stephan Wolff

  • Comparison of CT and CT Angiography Source Images With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Patients With Acute Stroke Within 6 Hours After Onset

    Peter Schramm;Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Sabine Heiland

  • Early recanalisation in acute ischaemic stroke saves tissue at risk defined by MRI

    Olav Jansen;Peter Schellinger;Jochen Fiebach;Werner Hacke

  • Effector-independent representations of simple and complex imagined finger movements: a combined fMRI and TMS study.

    J. P. Kuhtz-Buschbeck;C. Mahnkopf;C. Holzknecht;H. Siebner

  • Stroke magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours after onset of hyperacute cerebral ischemia

    Peter D. Schellinger;Jochen B. Fiebach;Olav Jansen;Peter A. Ringleb

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Forsting
Michael Forsting University of Duisburg-Essen
Ulrich Stephani
Ulrich Stephani Kiel University
Peter A. Ringleb
Peter A. Ringleb University Hospital Heidelberg
Günther Deuschl
Günther Deuschl Kiel University
Werner Hacke
Werner Hacke Heidelberg University
Martin M. Brown
Martin M. Brown University College London
George Howard
George Howard University of Alabama at Birmingham
Peter D. Schellinger
Peter D. Schellinger Ruhr University Bochum
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Jochen B. Fiebach
Jochen B. Fiebach Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways and academic programs beyond the traditional MD. Many students are looking for flexible and accelerated options. For those interested in starting a healthcare career quickly, 9 month lpn program options allow you to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less than a year, offering fast entry into patient care roles.

If you are interested in mental health, psychiatric np programs provide advanced training for nurses aiming to specialize as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners. These programs often deliver coursework online, helping current nurses upskill while continuing to work.

For those drawn to healthcare leadership, an affordable healthcare administration degree online offers foundational skills in management, policy, and finance. Graduates can pursue hospital administration, clinic operations, or healthcare consulting roles.

To deepen expertise, consider the cheapest mha programs online. These master’s degrees unlock higher-level opportunities and ensure you gain in-demand skills, all while managing costs through flexible, affordable study options.

Best Scientists Citing Olav Jansen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles