World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 12886 12127 6587 6092 619 55120

Tudor G. Jovin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tudor G. Jovin between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tudor G. Jovin published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 30 papers a year. Output peaked at 76 publications in 2021. 77 of the 781 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 76. Peak 76 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 53 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 60 publications 2016: 52 publications 2017: 53 publications 2018: 58 publications 2019: 59 publications 2020: 43 publications 2021: 76 publications 2022: 40 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 38 publications
2000 2025

781 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tudor G. Jovin: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 2
2005 14
2006 14
2007 13
2008 13
2009 4
2010 12
2011 7
2012 38
2013 53
2014 44
2015 60
2016 52
2017 53
2018 58
2019 59
2020 43
2021 76
2022 40
2023 44
2024 39
2025 38
Total 781
Download as CSV

Tudor G. Jovin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tudor G. Jovin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 619 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 619
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Tudor G. Jovin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tudor G. Jovin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tudor G. Jovin is affiliated with Cooper University Hospital in the United States and has a substantial publication record predominantly focused on acute ischemic stroke and related cerebrovascular conditions. Their research contributes extensively to the field of medicine, with significant emphasis on epidemiology, neurology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, internal medicine, and rehabilitation.

The scientist's research topics cover several key areas:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

Frequent venues for Tudor G. Jovin's publications include:

  • Stroke
  • Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Several recent papers authored by Tudor G. Jovin highlight ongoing contributions to the field:

  • Trial of Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke Due to Basilar-Artery Occlusion, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke beyond 6 h from time last known well (AURORA): a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis, 2021, The Lancet

Co-authorship with other researchers is also notable, with frequent collaborators including:

  • Ashutosh P. Jadhav
  • Raul G. Nogueira
  • James E. Siegler
  • David S. Liebeskind
  • Thanh N. Nguyen

Best Publications

  • Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials

    Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K. Menon;Wim H. van Zwam;Diederik W. J. Dippel

  • Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.

    Raul G. Nogueira;Ashutosh P. Jadhav;Diogo C. Haussen;Alain Bonafe

  • Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Alain Bonafe;Hans Christoph Diener

  • Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Aad van der Lugt;Bijoy K. Menon

  • Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for Stroke

    Joseph P Broderick;Yuko Y Palesch;Andrew M Demchuk;Sharon D Yeatts

  • Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis

    Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;Harriet Howlett-Smith;Barney J. Stern

  • Recommendations on Angiographic Revascularization Grading Standards for Acute Ischemic Stroke A Consensus Statement

    Osama O. Zaidat;Albert J. Yoo;Pooja Khatri;Thomas A. Tomsick

  • Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial

    Jeffrey L Saver;Reza Jahan;Elad I Levy;Tudor G Jovin

  • Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial

    Raul G Nogueira;Helmi L Lutsep;Rishi Gupta;Tudor G Jovin

  • Predictors of Ischemic Stroke in the Territory of a Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

    Scott E. Kasner;Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;Harriet Howlett-Smith

  • MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study.

    Maarten G. Lansberg;Matus Straka;Stephanie Kemp;Michael Mlynash

  • Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Michael D Hill;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K Menon;Raul G Nogueira

  • Neurotransplantation for patients with subcortical motor stroke: a phase 2 randomized trial.

    Douglas Kondziolka;Gary K. Steinberg;Lawrence Wechsler;Carolyn C. Meltzer

  • eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy

    David S. Liebeskind;Serge Bracard;Serge Bracard;Francis Guillemin;Francis Guillemin;Reza Jahan

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia During Endovascular Therapy for Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke Preliminary Results From a Retrospective, Multicenter Study

    Alex Abou-Chebl;Ridwan Lin;Muhammad Shazam Hussain;Tudor G. Jovin

  • Collaterals at Angiography and Outcomes in the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Trial

    David S. Liebeskind;Thomas A. Tomsick;Lydia D. Foster;Sharon D. Yeatts

  • Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment on Thrombectomy Outcome in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Bijoy K. Menon;Tolulope T. Sajobi;Yukun Zhang;Jeremy L. Rempel

  • Fast Versus Slow Progressors of Infarct Growth in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: Clinical and Research Implications

    Marcelo Rocha;Tudor G. Jovin

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Charles B. L. M. Majoie
Charles B. L. M. Majoie University of Amsterdam
Bruce C.V. Campbell
Bruce C.V. Campbell Royal Melbourne Hospital
Diederik W.J. Dippel
Diederik W.J. Dippel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Keith W. Muir
Keith W. Muir University of Glasgow
Gregory W. Albers
Gregory W. Albers Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but not sure about the traditional medical school path, there are a wide variety of related online degrees and career options worth exploring. Many students are discovering the flexibility and cost savings of affordable online nursing programs, which provide accessible pathways into the nursing profession without the need to relocate or pause your career.

For registered nurses seeking to advance their careers, the cheapest online rn to bsn programs allow you to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing at a lower cost. Additionally, experienced nurses interested in leadership or research roles can benefit from phd in nursing online programs—ideal for those wanting to reach the highest levels in nursing education and practice.

Are you a non-nurse with a bachelor’s degree considering a switch to nursing? Online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses offer a fast-track to become a registered nurse and pursue advanced practice roles. No matter your background, online degree options make it easier to enter or advance in the healthcare sector while balancing work and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Tudor G. Jovin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles