World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
38601
World Ranking
11147
National Ranking
1058

Keith W. Muir publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith W. Muir sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 475 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Keith W. Muir D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith W. Muir sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith W. Muir is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on stroke research and related neurological conditions. Their academic portfolio includes a significant body of work spanning epidemiology, neurology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, rehabilitation, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Among the main research topics covered by Keith W. Muir are:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Keith W. Muir has published research in several prominent venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Stroke
  • Neurology
  • Annals of Neurology
  • European Journal of Neurology
  • JAMA Neurology

Their collaborative network features frequent coauthors such as Phil White, Bruce Campbell, Mayank Goyal, Jochen B. Fiebach, and Michael D. Hill, reflecting a consistent engagement with a group of researchers active in stroke and neurological studies.

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by Keith W. Muir include:

  • "Intracerebral implantation of human neural stem cells and motor recovery after stroke: multicentre prospective single-arm study (PISCES-2)" (2020), Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • "Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation" (2020), Annals of Neurology
  • "Diagnosis and management of acute ischaemic stroke" (2020), Practical Neurology
  • "Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data" (2020), The Lancet
  • "Tenecteplase versus standard of care for minor ischaemic stroke with proven occlusion (TEMPO-2): a randomised, open label, phase 3 superiority trial" (2024), The Lancet

The breadth of Keith W. Muir's work spans clinical trials, systematic reviews, and applied neurological research, demonstrating an interdisciplinary approach especially relevant for acute ischemic stroke management and recovery phases. Their research contributes to a better understanding of stroke mechanisms, treatment protocols, and rehabilitation strategies within neurology and cardiovascular medicine.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008

    Peter A. Ringleb;Marie Germaine Bousser;Gary Ford;Philip Bath

  • MRI-Guided Thrombolysis for Stroke with Unknown Time of Onset

    Götz Thomalla;Claus Z. Simonsen;Florent Boutitie;Grethe Andersen

  • Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial.

    Stephen M Davis;Geoffrey A Donnan;Mark W Parsons;Christopher Levi

  • Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

    Robert G. Hart;Mukul Sharma;Hardi Mundl;Scott E. Kasner

  • Improving the Assessment of Outcomes in Stroke: Use of a Structured Interview to Assign Grades on the Modified Rankin Scale

    J.T. Lindsay Wilson;Asha Hareendran;Marie Grant;Tracey Baird

  • Thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4·5 h after acute ischaemic stroke (SITS-ISTR): an observational study

    Nils Wahlgren;Niaz Ahmed;Antoni Dávalos;Werner Hacke

  • Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry study.

    Wouter J. Schonewille;Christine A. C. Wijman;Patrik Michel;Christina M. Rueckert

  • Do Clinicians Overestimate the Severity of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

    Elliot J. Tilling;Salwa El Tawil;Keith W. Muir

  • Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) Trial A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure With STARFlex Septal Repair Implant to Resolve Refractory Migraine Headache

    Andrew Dowson;Michael J. Mullen;Richard Peatfield;Keith Muir

  • Clinical Experience With Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonist Drugs

    Keith W. Muir;Kennedy R. Lees

  • C-Reactive Protein and Outcome After Ischemic Stroke

    Keith W. Muir;Christopher J. Weir;Wafa Alwan;Iain B. Squire

  • Comparison of Neurological Scales and Scoring Systems for Acute Stroke Prognosis

    Keith W. Muir;Christopher J. Weir;Gordon D. Murray;Chris Povey

  • Magnesium for acute stroke (Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke trial): randomised controlled trial

    K W Muir;K W Muir;K R Lees;I Ford;I Ford;S Davis

  • EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: the DA VINCI study

    Kausik K Ray;Bart Molemans;W Marieke Schoonen;Periklis Giovas

  • Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Bruce C V Campbell;Henry Ma;Henry Ma;Peter A Ringleb;Mark W Parsons

  • Evaluation of C-reactive protein measurement for assessing the risk and prognosis in ischemic stroke: a statement for health care professionals from the CRP Pooling Project members.

    Mario Di Napoli;Markus Schwaninger;Roberto Cappelli;Elena Ceccarelli

  • Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale Across Multiple Raters Benefits of a Structured Interview

    J. T. Lindsay Wilson;Asha Hareendran;Anne Hendry;Jan Potter

  • Imaging of acute stroke

    Keith W Muir;Alastair Buchan;Rudiger von Kummer;Joachim Rother

  • Glutamate-based therapeutic approaches: clinical trials with NMDA antagonists

    Keith W Muir

  • Human neural stem cells in patients with chronic ischaemic stroke (PISCES): a phase 1, first-in-man study.

    Dheeraj Kalladka;John Sinden;Kenneth Pollock;Caroline Haig

Frequent Co-Authors

Kennedy R. Lees
Kennedy R. Lees University of Glasgow
Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary
Bruce C.V. Campbell
Bruce C.V. Campbell Royal Melbourne Hospital
Charles B. L. M. Majoie
Charles B. L. M. Majoie University of Amsterdam
Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill University of Calgary
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Diederik W.J. Dippel
Diederik W.J. Dippel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Francis Guillemin
Francis Guillemin University of Lorraine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in alternative routes to a medical career or expanding their clinical skills, online nursing and healthcare programs offer flexible options. One popular pathway is through online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, designed for registered nurses seeking their bachelor’s degree without on-site clinical requirements.

For those looking to advance their leadership in nursing, there are a range of dnp online programs that streamline the Doctor of Nursing Practice process. Considering time commitments, you might want to explore the fastest dnp online program options, allowing you to earn your degree more quickly than traditional routes.

Entry-level nursing is also accessible through a lpn fast track program online, which can help launch a practical nursing career in a shorter time frame.

These flexible online programs help students balance work and study, accelerate career advancement, and provide more accessible pathways into healthcare professions. As with any program, it’s important to ensure proper accreditation and to understand state-specific licensing requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Keith W. Muir

Trending Scientists